Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2009

Open Access 01-06-2009 | Gastrointestinal

Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain

Authors: Adrienne van Randen, Wytze Laméris, C. Yung Nio, Anje M. Spijkerboer, Mark A. Meier, Charlotte Tutein Nolthenius, Frank Smithuis, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Marja A. Boermeester, Jaap Stoker

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The level of inter-observer agreement of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in unselected patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the Emergency Department (ED) was evaluated. Two hundred consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain were prospectively included. Multi-slice CT was performed in all patients with intravenous contrast medium only. Three radiologists independently read all CT examinations. They recorded specific radiological features and a final diagnosis on a case record form. We calculated the proportion of agreement and kappa values, for overall, urgent and frequently occurring diagnoses. The mean age of the evaluated patients was 46 years (range 19–94), of which 54% were women. Overall agreement on diagnoses was good, with a median kappa of 0.66. Kappa values for specific urgent diagnoses were excellent, with median kappa values of 0.84, 0.90 and 0.81, for appendicitis, diverticulitis and bowel obstruction, respectively. Abdominal CT has good inter-observer agreement in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain at the ED, with excellent agreement for specific urgent diagnoses as diverticulitis and appendicitis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McDonald GP, Pendarvis DP, Wilmoth R, Daley BJ (2001) Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy. Am Surg 67:1017–1021PubMed McDonald GP, Pendarvis DP, Wilmoth R, Daley BJ (2001) Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy. Am Surg 67:1017–1021PubMed
2.
go back to reference Weyant MJ, Eachempati SR, Maluccio MA et al (2000) Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. Surgery 128:145–152PubMedCrossRef Weyant MJ, Eachempati SR, Maluccio MA et al (2000) Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. Surgery 128:145–152PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ (1997) Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1275–1280PubMed Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ (1997) Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1275–1280PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146PubMedCrossRef Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ng CS, Watson CJ, Palmer CR et al (2002) Evaluation of early abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients with acute abdominal pain of unknown cause: prospective randomised study. BMJ 325:1387PubMedCrossRef Ng CS, Watson CJ, Palmer CR et al (2002) Evaluation of early abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients with acute abdominal pain of unknown cause: prospective randomised study. BMJ 325:1387PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Keyzer C, Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Bohy P, Gevenois PA, Van GD (2004) Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 232:164–172PubMedCrossRef Keyzer C, Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Bohy P, Gevenois PA, Van GD (2004) Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 232:164–172PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tack D, Bohy P, Perlot I et al (2005) Suspected acute colon diverticulitis: imaging with low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 237:189–196PubMedCrossRef Tack D, Bohy P, Perlot I et al (2005) Suspected acute colon diverticulitis: imaging with low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 237:189–196PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Weltman DI, Yu J, Krumenacker J Jr, Huang S, Moh P (2000) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient. Radiology 216:172–177PubMed Weltman DI, Yu J, Krumenacker J Jr, Huang S, Moh P (2000) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient. Radiology 216:172–177PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ et al (2001) Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:933–941PubMed Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ et al (2001) Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:933–941PubMed
10.
go back to reference Laméris W, van Randen A, Dijkgraaf MG, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Optimization of diagnostic imaging use in patients with acute abdominal pain (OPTIMA): Design and rationale (2007). BMC Emerg Med 7:9 (Aug 6)CrossRef Laméris W, van Randen A, Dijkgraaf MG, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Optimization of diagnostic imaging use in patients with acute abdominal pain (OPTIMA): Design and rationale (2007). BMC Emerg Med 7:9 (Aug 6)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Irwig L, Macaskill P, Walter SD, Houssami N (2006) New methods give better estimates of changes in diagnostic accuracy when prior information is provided. J Clin Epidemiol 59:299–307PubMedCrossRef Irwig L, Macaskill P, Walter SD, Houssami N (2006) New methods give better estimates of changes in diagnostic accuracy when prior information is provided. J Clin Epidemiol 59:299–307PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Altman D (1997) Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 403–407 Altman D (1997) Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 403–407
13.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225:400–406PubMedCrossRef Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225:400–406PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zangos S, Steenburg SD, Phillips KD et al (2007) Acute abdomen: Added diagnostic value of coronal reformations with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography. Acad Radiol 14:19–27PubMedCrossRef Zangos S, Steenburg SD, Phillips KD et al (2007) Acute abdomen: Added diagnostic value of coronal reformations with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography. Acad Radiol 14:19–27PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Loy CT, Irwig L (2004) Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA 292:1602–1609PubMedCrossRef Loy CT, Irwig L (2004) Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA 292:1602–1609PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain
Authors
Adrienne van Randen
Wytze Laméris
C. Yung Nio
Anje M. Spijkerboer
Mark A. Meier
Charlotte Tutein Nolthenius
Frank Smithuis
Patrick M. Bossuyt
Marja A. Boermeester
Jaap Stoker
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1294-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

European Radiology 6/2009 Go to the issue