Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of General Psychiatry 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Disorders of Intellectual Development | Research

A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study

Authors: McKernan Laura Ward, Sally-Ann Cooper, Angela Henderson, Bethany Stanley, Nicola Greenlaw, Christine Pacitti, Deborah Cairns

Published in: Annals of General Psychiatry | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

People with intellectual disabilities may face a disproportionate risk of experiencing high anticholinergic burden, and its negative sequalae, from a range of medications, and at younger ages than the general population, but there has been little previous study. Our aim was to determine the source of anticholinergic burden from prescribed medication.

Methods

Retrospective matched observational study using record linkage. Adults with (n = 4,305), and without (n = 12,915), intellectual disabilities matched by age-, sex- and neighbourhood deprivation. The main outcome measure was the prescription of long-term (approximately 12 months use) anticholinergic medications overall (classified according to the Anticholinergic Risk Scale [ARS]), by drug class, individual drugs, and polypharmacy.

Results

Adults with n = 1,654 (38.4%), and without n = 3,047 (23.6%), intellectual disabilities were prescribed medications long-term with anticholinergic effects. Of those on such drugs, adults with intellectual disabilities were most likely to be on central nervous system (62.6%), gastrointestinal (46.7%), and cardiovascular (28.4%) medications. They were prescribed more central nervous system, gynaecological/urinary tract, musculoskeletal, and respiratory medications, and less cardiovascular, infection, and endocrine medications than their matched comparators. Regardless of age, sex, or neighbourhood deprivation, adults with intellectual disabilities had greater odds of being prescribed antipsychotics (OR = 5.37 [4.40–6.57], p < 0.001), antiepileptics (OR = 2.57 [2.22–2.99], p < 0.001), and anxiolytics/hypnotics (OR = 1.28 [1.06–1.56], p = 0.012). Compared to the general population, adults with intellectual disabilities were more likely to be exposed to overall anticholinergic polypharmacy (OR = 1.48 [1.33–1.66], p < 0.001), and to psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 2.79 [2.41–3.23], p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Adults with intellectual disabilities are exposed to a greater risk of having very high anticholinergic burden through polypharmacy from several classes of medications, which may be prescribed by several different prescribers. There is a need for evidence-based recommendations specifically about people with intellectual disabilities with multiple physical and mental ill-health conditions to optimise medication use, reduce inappropriate prescribing and adverse anticholinergic effects.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
16.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015). Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: prevention and interventions for people with learning disabilities whose behaviour challenges. [NICE Guideline Number 11]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015). Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: prevention and interventions for people with learning disabilities whose behaviour challenges. [NICE Guideline Number 11]. https://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​ng11.
24.
go back to reference Glover G, Williams R, Branford D, et al. Prescribing of psychotropic drugs to people with learning disabilities and/or autism by general practitioners in England. London: Public Health England; 2015. Glover G, Williams R, Branford D, et al. Prescribing of psychotropic drugs to people with learning disabilities and/or autism by general practitioners in England. London: Public Health England; 2015.
Metadata
Title
A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study
Authors
McKernan Laura Ward
Sally-Ann Cooper
Angela Henderson
Bethany Stanley
Nicola Greenlaw
Christine Pacitti
Deborah Cairns
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1744-859X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-022-00418-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Annals of General Psychiatry 1/2022 Go to the issue