Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, et al. Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90° rotation technique. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 211-5.CrossRefPubMed Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, et al. Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90° rotation technique. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 211-5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hwang JW, Park HP, Lim YJ, Do SH, Lee SC, Jeon YT. Comparison of two insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: standard versus 90-degree rotation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 905-7.CrossRefPubMed Hwang JW, Park HP, Lim YJ, Do SH, Lee SC, Jeon YT. Comparison of two insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: standard versus 90-degree rotation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 905-7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. A comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 286-7.PubMed Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. A comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 286-7.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 739-60.CrossRefPubMed Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 739-60.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jaensson M, Olowsson LL, Nilsson U. Endotracheal tube size and sore throat following surgery: a randomized-controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 147-53.CrossRefPubMed Jaensson M, Olowsson LL, Nilsson U. Endotracheal tube size and sore throat following surgery: a randomized-controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 147-53.CrossRefPubMed
1.
go back to reference Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, et al. Insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90° rotation technique. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 211-5.CrossRefPubMed Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, et al. Insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90° rotation technique. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 211-5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hwang JW, Park HP, Lim YJ, Do SH, Lee SC, Jeon YT. Comparison of two insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: standard versus 90-degree rotation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 905-7.CrossRefPubMed Hwang JW, Park HP, Lim YJ, Do SH, Lee SC, Jeon YT. Comparison of two insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: standard versus 90-degree rotation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 905-7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 739-60.CrossRefPubMed Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 739-60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway with the 90° rotation technique
Authors
Fu S. Xue, MD
Qiang Wang, MD
Yu Jing Yuan, MD
Jun Xiong, MD
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-010-9298-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2010 Go to the issue