Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2006

01-08-2006 | Dynamic manuscript

Initial clinical experience with a partly autonomous robotic surgical instrument server

Authors: M. R. Treat, S. E. Amory, P. E. Downey, D. A. Taliaferro

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The authors believe it would be useful to have surgical robots capable of some degree of autonomous action in cooperation with the human members of a surgical team. They believe that a starting point for such development would be a system for delivering and retrieving instruments during a surgical procedure.

Methods

The described robot delivers instruments to the surgeon and retrieves the instruments when they are no longer being used. Voice recognition software takes in requests from the surgeon. A mechanical arm with a gripper is used to handle the instruments. Machine-vision cameras locate the instruments after the surgeon puts them down. Artificial intelligence software makes decisions about the best response to the surgeon’s requests.

Results

A robot was successfully used in surgery for the first time June 16, 2005. The operation involved excision of a benign lipoma. The procedure lasted 31 min, during which time the robot performed 16 instrument deliveries and 13 instrument returns with no significant errors. The average time between verbal request and delivery of an instrument was 12.4 s.

Conclusions

The described robot is capable of delivering instruments to a surgeon at command and can retrieve them independently using machine vision. This robot, termed a “surgical instrument server,” represents a new class of information-processing machines that will relieve the operating room team of repetitive tasks and allow the members to focus more attention on the patient.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Beyea SC (2003) Counting instruments and sponges. AORN J 78: 290–294PubMed Beyea SC (2003) Counting instruments and sponges. AORN J 78: 290–294PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ (2003) Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 348: 229–235PubMedCrossRef Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ (2003) Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 348: 229–235PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Laird JE, Newell A, Rosenbloom PS (1987) Soar: an architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 33: 1–64CrossRef Laird JE, Newell A, Rosenbloom PS (1987) Soar: an architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 33: 1–64CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Whelan PF, Molloy D (2001) Machine vision algorithms in Java: techniques and implementation. Springer-Verlag, London, Berlin, Heidelberg Whelan PF, Molloy D (2001) Machine vision algorithms in Java: techniques and implementation. Springer-Verlag, London, Berlin, Heidelberg
Metadata
Title
Initial clinical experience with a partly autonomous robotic surgical instrument server
Authors
M. R. Treat
S. E. Amory
P. E. Downey
D. A. Taliaferro
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0511-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2006 Go to the issue