Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 5/2020

01-10-2020 | Inguinal Hernia Surgery | Original Article

Value and patient appreciation of follow-up after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair

Authors: W. J. Bakker, C. V. van Hessen, G. J. Clevers, E. J. M. M. Verleisdonk, J. P. J. Burgmans

Published in: Hernia | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There is some consensus on inguinal hernia surgery follow-up in research settings. However, consensus on regular follow-up is lacking. Therefore, patients and surgeons are unnecessarily burdened and not cost-efficient. Moreover, the purpose of follow-up is barely questioned. This study aims to evaluate follow-up after inguinal hernia repair and determine patient satisfaction.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was executed in a high-volume specialized hernia clinic. All totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair patients between July and October 2016 were included. Telephone follow-up was performed at 1 day, 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. One year postoperatively it was assessed whether patients visited other healthcare organizations, had remaining inguinal complaints, a Post-INguinal-repair-Questionnaire by telephone (PINQ-PHONE) was executed, and appreciation with follow-up was determined.

Results

Respectively, 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, 138 (79.3%) and 130 (74.7%) of 174 included patients were reached. One year postoperatively 15 patients (11.5%) had remaining inguinal complaints, of which only four patients (3.1%) had not already reported their symptoms. Nineteen patients (14.6%) presented with self-reported complaints between 6 weeks and 1 year, and no patients went to other hospitals. Respectively, 107 (82.3%), 61 (46.9%) and 117 (90.0%) patients considered follow-up useful at 6 weeks, 1 year and in general. One hundred nineteen patients (91.5%) preferred telephone follow-up to outpatient clinic appointments.

Conclusion

TEP patients value a telephone follow-up time-point, however, long-term follow-up is not considered useful. Patients report postoperative complaints themselves, therefore performing follow-up serves no clinical purpose. The purpose of follow-up is patient satisfaction and registration for quality objectives.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Langeveld HR, van't Riet M, Weidema WF, Stassen LP, Steyerberg EW, Lange J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824CrossRef Langeveld HR, van't Riet M, Weidema WF, Stassen LP, Steyerberg EW, Lange J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lichtenstein IL (1987) Herniorrhaphy. A personal experience with 6321 cases. Am J Surg 153:553–559CrossRef Lichtenstein IL (1987) Herniorrhaphy. A personal experience with 6321 cases. Am J Surg 153:553–559CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kehlet H (2008) Chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 95:135–136CrossRef Kehlet H (2008) Chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 95:135–136CrossRef
4.
go back to reference HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165CrossRef HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Molegraaf M, Lange J, Wijsmuller A (2017) Uniformity of chronic pain assessment after inguinal hernia repair: a critical review of the literature. Eur Surg Res 58:1–19CrossRef Molegraaf M, Lange J, Wijsmuller A (2017) Uniformity of chronic pain assessment after inguinal hernia repair: a critical review of the literature. Eur Surg Res 58:1–19CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bhangu A, Singh P, Pinkney T, Blazeby JM (2015) A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19:65–75CrossRef Bhangu A, Singh P, Pinkney T, Blazeby JM (2015) A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19:65–75CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F (2016) A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European registry for abdominal wall hernias quality of life instrument. Surgery 160:1344–1357CrossRef Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F (2016) A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European registry for abdominal wall hernias quality of life instrument. Surgery 160:1344–1357CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bakker WJ, Roos MM, Kerkman T, Burgmans JPJ (2019) Experience with the PINQ-PHONE telephone questionnaire for detection of recurrences after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 23:685–691CrossRef Bakker WJ, Roos MM, Kerkman T, Burgmans JPJ (2019) Experience with the PINQ-PHONE telephone questionnaire for detection of recurrences after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 23:685–691CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149–158CrossRef Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149–158CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Adamu-Biu F, Akoh JA (2019) Survey of patients regarding experience following repair of inguinal hernias. Hernia 24:187–195CrossRef Adamu-Biu F, Akoh JA (2019) Survey of patients regarding experience following repair of inguinal hernias. Hernia 24:187–195CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Davies C, Vas P, Oyibo SO (2013) Telephone follow-up for the management of thyrotoxicosis: a patient satisfaction survey. J Telemed Telecare 19:29–32CrossRef Davies C, Vas P, Oyibo SO (2013) Telephone follow-up for the management of thyrotoxicosis: a patient satisfaction survey. J Telemed Telecare 19:29–32CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Balzarro M, Rubilotta E, Trabacchin N, Mancini V, Costantini E, Artibani W, Antonelli A (2019) A prospective comparative study of the feasibility and reliability of telephone follow-up in female urology: the Patient Home Office Novel Evaluation (PHONE) Study. Urology 136:82–87CrossRef Balzarro M, Rubilotta E, Trabacchin N, Mancini V, Costantini E, Artibani W, Antonelli A (2019) A prospective comparative study of the feasibility and reliability of telephone follow-up in female urology: the Patient Home Office Novel Evaluation (PHONE) Study. Urology 136:82–87CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Roos M, Bakker WJ, Schouten N, Voorbrood C, Clevers GJ, Verleisdonk EJ, Davids P, Burgmans J (2018) Higher recurrence rate after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with ultrapro lightweight mesh: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial (TULP-trial). Ann Surg 268:241–246CrossRef Roos M, Bakker WJ, Schouten N, Voorbrood C, Clevers GJ, Verleisdonk EJ, Davids P, Burgmans J (2018) Higher recurrence rate after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with ultrapro lightweight mesh: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial (TULP-trial). Ann Surg 268:241–246CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Merskey H, Bogduk N (1986) Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain (Suppl 3):S1–226 Merskey H, Bogduk N (1986) Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain (Suppl 3):S1–226
15.
go back to reference Melkemichel M, Bringman S, Widhe B (2018) Lower recurrence rate with heavyweight mesh compared to lightweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair of groin hernia: a nationwide population-based register study. Hernia 22:989–997CrossRef Melkemichel M, Bringman S, Widhe B (2018) Lower recurrence rate with heavyweight mesh compared to lightweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair of groin hernia: a nationwide population-based register study. Hernia 22:989–997CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pena ME, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, Sadava EE (2019) Could long-term follow-up modify the outcomes after laparoscopic TAPP? A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Hernia 23:693–698CrossRef Pena ME, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, Sadava EE (2019) Could long-term follow-up modify the outcomes after laparoscopic TAPP? A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Hernia 23:693–698CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kyle-Leinhase I, Kockerling F, Jorgensen LN, Montgomery A, Gillion JF, Rodriguez JAP, Hope W, Muysoms F (2018) Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project. Hernia 22:561–575CrossRef Kyle-Leinhase I, Kockerling F, Jorgensen LN, Montgomery A, Gillion JF, Rodriguez JAP, Hope W, Muysoms F (2018) Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project. Hernia 22:561–575CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Collaboration DHD (2008) Nationwide quality improvement of groin hernia repair from the danish hernia database of 87,840 patients from 1998 to 2005. Hernia 12:1–7CrossRef Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Collaboration DHD (2008) Nationwide quality improvement of groin hernia repair from the danish hernia database of 87,840 patients from 1998 to 2005. Hernia 12:1–7CrossRef
19.
go back to reference de Neree Tot Babberich MPM, Detering R, Dekker JWT, Elferink MA, Tollenaar RAEM, Wouters MWJM, Tanis PJ, Dutch ColoRectal Audit Group (2018) Achievements in colorectal cancer care during 8 years of auditing in The Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:1361–1370CrossRef de Neree Tot Babberich MPM, Detering R, Dekker JWT, Elferink MA, Tollenaar RAEM, Wouters MWJM, Tanis PJ, Dutch ColoRectal Audit Group (2018) Achievements in colorectal cancer care during 8 years of auditing in The Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:1361–1370CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales Conde S, Puppe F, Simmermacher RK, Smietanski M, Miserez M (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16:239–250CrossRef Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales Conde S, Puppe F, Simmermacher RK, Smietanski M, Miserez M (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16:239–250CrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Hout L, Bokkerink WJV, Ibelings MS, Vriens PWHE (2020) Perioperative monitoring of inguinal hernia patients with a smartphone application. Hernia 24:179–185CrossRef van Hout L, Bokkerink WJV, Ibelings MS, Vriens PWHE (2020) Perioperative monitoring of inguinal hernia patients with a smartphone application. Hernia 24:179–185CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Value and patient appreciation of follow-up after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair
Authors
W. J. Bakker
C. V. van Hessen
G. J. Clevers
E. J. M. M. Verleisdonk
J. P. J. Burgmans
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02220-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Hernia 5/2020 Go to the issue