Top

Intensive Care Medicine

Published in:

01-03-2006 | Original

Informed consent for research in ICU obtained before ICU admission

Authors: Catherine Chenaud, Paolo Merlani, Bara Ricou

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 3/2006

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the procedure of the informed consent for ICU research obtained before ICU admission.

Design

Prospective, open, observational study.

Setting

20-bed surgical ICU of a tertiary teaching university hospital and the ward before and after ICU.

Patients

Patients, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, who accepted to participate in a coagulation study.

Interventions

Patients underwent the same informed consent procedure, including an oral presentation of the coagulation study and an informative leaflet the day before surgery on the ward.

Measurements and results

Between January and August 2001, we included 38 patients; 36 survived ICU. Ten to 12 days after surgery, 8/36 (22%) patients did not know they had participated in a study, and 9/36 (25%) could not recall the study purpose and the related risk. Patients with incomplete recall stayed longer in ICU [median (range): 4 (3–6) vs 3 (1–5) days; p = 0.004]. None of these patients (0/9 vs 10/27; p < 0.04) had read the informative leaflet AND asked at least one question during the informed consent procedure.

Conclusions

Even when the informed consent is obtained in the most optimal conditions for ICU research, its ethical value remains questionable. Indeed, a substantial number of patients were unaware of their study participation, or of the related purpose and risks. When the ICU stay is prolonged, we should at least repeatedly and actively (re)-inform patients about their study participation.

(1996) Declaration of Helsinki (1964) BMJ 313:1448a–1449

(2001) Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. In: Official Journal L 121,01/05/2001 P.0034–0044

Etchells E, Sharpe G, Burgess MM, Singer PA (1996) Bioethics for clinicians: 2. Disclosure. CMAJ 155:387–391PubMed

Etchells E, Darzins P, Silberfeld M, Singer PA, McKenny J, Naglie G, Katz M, Guyatt GH, Molloy DW, Strang D (1999) Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment. J Gen Intern Med 14:27–34PubMedCrossRef

Silverman HJ (1996) Ethical considerations of ensuring an informed and autonomous consent in research involving critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:582–586PubMed

Lemaire F, Bion J, Blanco J, Damas P, Druml C, Falke K, Kesecioglu J, Larsson A, Mancebo J, Matamis D, Pesenti A, Pimentel J, Ranieri M (2005) The European Union Directive on Clinical Research: present status of implementation in EU Member States' legislations with regard to the incompetent patient. Intensive Care Med 31:476–479PubMedCrossRef

Silverman HJ, Druml C, Lemaire F, Nelson R (2004) The European Union Directive and the protection of incapacitated subjects in research: an ethical analysis. Intensive Care Med 30:1723–1729PubMedCrossRef

Lemaire F (2004) A waiver of consent for intensive care research? Intensive Care Med 30:177–179PubMedCrossRef

Smithline HA, Mader TJ, Crenshaw BJ (1999) Do patients with acute medical conditions have the capacity to give informed consent for emergency medicine research? Acad Emerg Med 6:776–780PubMedCrossRef

10.

Cassell EJ, Leon AC, Kaufman SG (2001) Preliminary evidence of impaired thinking in sick patients. Ann Intern Med 134:1120–1123PubMed

11.

Cohen LM, McCue JD, Green GM (1993) Do clinical and formal assessments of the capacity of patients in the intensive care unit to make decisions agree? Arch Intern Med 153:2481–2485PubMedCrossRef

12.

Ferrand E, Bachoud-Levi AC, Rodrigues M, Maggiore S, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F (2001) Decision-making capacity and surrogate designation in French ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 27:1360–1364PubMedCrossRef

13.

Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963PubMedCrossRef

14.

Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M, Taub N, Habiba M (2004) Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire study. BJOG 111:1133–1138PubMedCrossRef

15.

Williams BF, French JK, White HD (2003) Informed consent during the clinical emergency of acute myocardial infarction (HERO-2 consent substudy): a prospective observational study. Lancet 361:918–922PubMedCrossRef

16.

Gammelgaard A, Mortensen OS, Rossel P (2004) Patients' perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a questionnaire-based survey of the consent process in the DANAMI-2 trial. Heart 90:1124–1128PubMedCrossRef

17.

Yuval R, Halon DA, Merdler A, Khader N, Karkabi B, Uziel K, Lewis BS (2000) Patient comprehension and reaction to participating in a double-blind randomized clinical trial (ISIS-4) in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 160:1142–1146PubMedCrossRef

18.

Taub HA, Baker MT, Sturr JF (1986) Informed consent for research. Effects of readability, patient age, and education. J Am Geriatr Soc 34:601–606PubMed

19.

Hekkenberg RJ, Irish JC, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ (1997) Informed consent in head and neck surgery: How much do patients actually remember? J Otolaryngol 26:155–159PubMed

20.

Flory J, Emanuel E (2004) Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA 292:1593–1601PubMedCrossRef

21.

Dreyfuss D (2005) Is it better to consent to an RCT or to care? (“nothing in excess”). Intensive Care Med 31:345–355PubMedCrossRef

22.

Truog RD (2005) Will ethical requirements bring critical care research to a halt? Intensive Care Med 31:338–344PubMedCrossRef

23.

Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C (2004) What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis 189:930–937PubMedCrossRef

Title: Informed consent for research in ICU obtained before ICU admission
Authors: Catherine Chenaud
Paolo Merlani
Bara Ricou
Publication date: 01-03-2006
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-0059-4

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Informed consent for research in ICU obtained before ICU admission

Abstract

Objective

Design

Setting

Patients

Interventions

Measurements and results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Design

Setting

Patients

Interventions

Measurements and results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Mean glucose level is not an independent risk factor for mortality in mixed ICU patients

Saline volume in transvesical intra-abdominal pressure measurement: enough is enough

Effects of neuromuscular block on systemic and cerebral hemodynamics and bispectral index during moderate or deep sedation in critically ill patients

Dramatic beneficial effects of sildenafil in recurrent massive pulmonary embolism

Atrial fibrillation in trauma patients requiring intensive care

Procalcitonin kinetics in the prognosis of severe community-acquired pneumonia