Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Informal carers’ health-related quality of life and patient experience in primary care: evidence from 195,364 carers in England responding to a national survey

Authors: Gwilym P.A. Thomas, Catherine L. Saunders, Martin O. Roland, Charlotte A.M. Paddison

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aim to describe the health-related quality of life of informal carers and their experiences of primary care.

Methods

Responses from the 2011-12 English General Practice Patient Survey, including 195,364 informal carers, were analysed using mixed effect logistic regressions controlling for age, gender, ethnicity and social deprivation to describe carer health-related quality of life (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression, measured using EQ-5D) and primary care experience (access, continuity and communication).

Results

Informal carers reported poorer health-related quality of life than non-carers of similar age, gender, ethnicity and social deprivation. Increasing caring commitment was associated with worse EQ-5D scores, with carers of 50+ hours a week scoring 0.05 points lower than non-carers (95 % CI 0.05 to 0.04), equivalent to 18 fewer days of full health annually. Considering each domain of EQ-5D separately, carers of 50+ hours/week were more likely to report pain OR = 1.53 (1.50-1.57), p < 0.0001, and anxiety/depression OR = 1.69 (1.66-1.73), p < 0.0001, than non-carers. Younger carers scored lower on EQ-5D than non-carer peers but the converse was true among over-85s. In the most deprived areas carers reported the equivalent of 37 fewer days of full health annually than carers in the most affluent areas. On average, carers reported poorer patient experiences in all areas of primary care than non-carers (odds ratios 0.84-0.97), with this difference being most marked in the domain of access.

Conclusions

Informal carers experience a double disadvantage of poorer health-related quality of life and poorer patient experience in primary care. We find no evidence for health benefits of caregiving. We recommend physicians identify and treat carer health problems, including pain and anxiety/depression, particularly among young, deprived and high time-commitment carers. Improving patient experience for carers, including access to primary care, should be a priority.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Supporting Carers: An Action Guide for General Practitioners and Their Teams. Second Edition. London, UK: The Princess Royal Trust for Carers, The Royal College of General Practitioners; 2011, p. 20-33.
4.
Collins L, Swartz K. Caregiver care. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83:1309–17.PubMed
5.
Caregiving in the U.S. 2009. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Alliance for Caregiving, AARP; 2009
6.
White C. 2011 census analysis: unpaid care in England and Wales, 2011 and comparison with 2001. London: Office for National Statistics; 2013.
7.
8.
Hirst M. Health inequalities and informal care: End of project report. York, UK: The University of York Social Policy Research Unit; 2004.
9.
House of Lords Select Committee on Public Service Demographic Change. Ready for ageing? Report of session 2012-13. London, UK: The Stationery Office; 2013.
10.
Buckner L, Yeandle S. Valuing carers 2011; calculating the value of Carers’ support. Leeds, UK: Carers UK, University of Leeds; 2011.
11.
Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, Choula R. Valuing the invaluable: 2011 update-the growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. Washington, DC, USA: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2011.
12.
Pickard L. Informal care for older people provided by their adult children: projections of supply and demand to 2041. Report to the strategy unit (cabinet office) and the Department of Health. London, UK: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2008.
13.
Institute of Medicine. Retooling for an aging America: building the health care workforce. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press; 2008.
14.
Vitaliano PP, Zhang J, Scanlan JM. Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:946–72.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003;18:250–67.CrossRefPubMed
16.
The NHS Information Centre Social Care Team. Survey of carers in households-England, 2009–10. Leeds, UK: Health & Social Care Information Centre; 2010.
17.
18.
Evercare Study of Caregivers in Decline: A Close-up Look at the Health Risks of Caring for a Loved One. Minnetonka, MN, USA: Evercare, National Alliance for Caregiving; 2006, p. 5-32.
19.
Schulz R. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the caregiver health effects study. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:2215–9.CrossRef
20.
Dujardin C, Farfan-Portet M-I, Mitchell R, Popham F, Thomas I, et al. Does country influence the health burden of informal care? an international comparison between Belgium and great Britain. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:32–1123.CrossRef
21.
Anderson LA, Edwards VJ, Pearson WS, Talley RC, McGuire LC, Andresen EM. Adult caregivers in the United States: characteristics and differences in well-being, by caregiver age and caregiving status. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10, E135.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Tommis Y, Robinson CA, Seddon D, Woods B, Perry J, Russell IT. Carers with chronic conditions: changes over time in their physical health. Chronic Illn. 2009;5:155–64.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Legg L, Weir CJ, Langhorne P, Smith LN, Stott DJ. Is informal caregiving independently associated with poor health? a population-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:95–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs MS. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311:1052–60.CrossRef
25.
Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Correlates of physical health of informal caregivers: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007;62:P126–37.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Brown SL, Smith DM, Schulz R, Kabeto MU, Ubel PA, Poulin M, et al. Caregiving behavior is associated with decreased mortality risk. Psychol Sci. 2009;20:488–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Roth DL, Haley WE, Hovater M, Perkins M, Wadley VG, Judd S. Family caregiving and all-cause mortality: findings from a population-based propensity-matched analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178:1571–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Brown SL, Nesse RM, Vinokur AD, Smith DM. Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychol Sci. 2003;14:320–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Buyck J-F, Bonnaud S, Boumendil A, Andrieu S, Bonenfant S, Goldberg M, et al. Informal caregiving and self-reported mental and physical health: results from the gazel cohort study. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:1971–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
McCann JJ, Hebert LE, Bienias JL, Morris MC, Evans DA. Predictors of beginning and ending caregiving during a 3-year period in a biracial community population of older adults. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1800–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Fredman L, Doros G, Ensrud KE, Hochberg MC, Cauley JA. Caregiving intensity and change in physical functioning over a 2-year period: results of the caregiver-study of osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:203–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Perreault M, Rousseau M, Provencher H, Roberts S, Milton D. Predictors of caregiver satisfaction with mental health services. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48:232–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001570.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Llanwarne NR, Abel GA, Elliott MN, Paddison CAM, Lyratzopoulos G, Campbell JL, et al. Relationship between clinical quality and patient experience: analysis of data from the English Quality and Outcomes Framework and the National GP Patient Survey. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:467–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Paddison C, Elliott M, Parker R, Staetsky L, Lyratzopoulos G, Campbell JL, et al. Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? evidence from the English general practice patient survey. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:634–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Ipsos MORI. Technical annex for the GP patient survey 2011–12. London, UK: Ipsos MORI; 2012.
37.
Roland M, Elliott M, Lyratzopoulos G, Barbiere J, Parker RA, Smith P, et al. Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national general practitioner patient survey data in England. BMJ. 2009;339:b3851.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
McLennan D, Barnes H, Noble M, Davies J, Garratt E, Dibben C. The English indices of deprivation 2010. London, UK: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2011.
43.
Becker F, Becker S. Young adult carers in the UK experiences, needs and services for carers aged 16-24. London, UK: The Princess Royal Trust for Carers; 2008.
44.
45.
Uphoff EP, Pickett KE, Cabieses B, Small N, Wright J. A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: a contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
O’Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN, Zaborski L, Cleary PD. Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 2):2162–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Lyratzopoulos G, Elliott M, Barbiere JM, Henderson A, Staetsky L, Paddison C, et al. Understanding ethnic and other socio-demographic differences in patient experience of primary care: evidence from the English general practice patient survey. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:21–9.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Mead N, Roland M. Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices. BMJ. 2009;339:b3450.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Weech-Maldonado R, Morales LS, Elliott M, Spritzer K, Marshall G, Hays RD. Race/ethnicity, language, and patients’ assessments of care in Medicaid managed care. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:789–808.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. Patients’ perception of hospital care in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1921–31.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Lyratzopoulos G, Elliott MN, Barbiere JM, Staetsky L, Paddison CA, Campbell J, et al. How can health care organizations be reliably compared?: Lessons from a national survey of patient experience. Med Care. 2011;49:724–33.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Groves RM, Peytcheva E. The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 2008;72:167–89.CrossRef
53.
Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Surbey methodology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2011. p. 183–216.
54.
55.
56.
Halbesleben JRB, Whitman MV. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res. 2013;48:913–30.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Caroline Glendenning. Support for carers of older people-some intranational and national comparisons. London, UK: Audit Commission; 2003.
58.
Carduff E, Finucane A, Kendall M, Jarvis A, Harrison N, Greenacre J, et al. Understanding the barriers to identifying carers of people with advanced illness in primary care: triangulating three data sources. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:69–77.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Informal carers’ health-related quality of life and patient experience in primary care: evidence from 195,364 carers in England responding to a national survey
Authors
Gwilym P.A. Thomas
Catherine L. Saunders
Martin O. Roland
Charlotte A.M. Paddison
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0277-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Primary Care 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Primary healthcare needs and barriers to care among Calgary’s homeless populations

Research article

Recommendations to facilitate the ideal fit note: are they achievable in practice?

Research article

Studies of the symptom dyspnoea: A systematic review

Study protocol

Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary Risk Factor Assessment and Management Programme for Hypertension (RAMP-HT)

Research article

A qualitative study exploring the acceptability of the McNulty-Zelen design for randomised controlled trials evaluating educational interventions

Research article

Revealing hidden depression in older people: a qualitative study within a randomised controlled trial