Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 5/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Influencing factors for port-site hernias after single-incision laparoscopy

Authors: F. P. Buckley III, H. E. Vassaur, D. C. Jupiter, J. H. Crosby, C. J. Wheeless, J. L. Vassaur

Published in: Hernia | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been demonstrated to be a feasible alternative to multiport laparoscopy, but concerns over port-site incisional hernias have not been well addressed. A retrospective study was performed to determine the rate of port-site hernias as well as influencing risk factors for developing this complication.

Methods

A review of all consecutive patients who underwent SILS over 4 years was conducted using electronic medical records in a multi-specialty integrated healthcare system. Statistical evaluation included descriptive analysis of demographics in addition to bivariate and multivariate analyses of potential risk factors, which were age, gender, BMI, procedure, existing insertion-site hernia, wound infection, tobacco use, steroid use, and diabetes.

Results

787 patients who underwent SILS without conversion to open were reviewed. There were 454 cholecystectomies, 189 appendectomies, 72 colectomies, 21 fundoplications, 15 transabdominal inguinal herniorrhaphies, and 36 other surgeries. Cases included 532 (67.6 %) women, and among all patients mean age was 44.65 (±19.05) years and mean BMI of 28.04 (±6). Of these, 50 (6.35 %) patients were documented as developing port-site incisional hernias by a health care provider or by incidental imaging. Of the risk factors analyzed, insertion-site hernia, age, and BMI were significant. Multivariate analysis indicated that both preexisting hernia and BMI were significant risk factors (p value = 0.00212; p value = 0.0307). Morbidly obese patients had the highest incidence of incisional hernias at 18.18 % (p value = 0.02).

Conclusions

When selecting patients for SILS, surgeons should consider the presence of an umbilical hernia, increased age and obesity as risk factors for developing a port-site hernia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E et al (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21:529–533CrossRefPubMed Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E et al (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21:529–533CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Comajuncosas J, Hermoso J, Gris P et al (2014) Risk factors for umbilical trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective 3-year follow-up study. Am J Surg 207:1–6CrossRefPubMed Comajuncosas J, Hermoso J, Gris P et al (2014) Risk factors for umbilical trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective 3-year follow-up study. Am J Surg 207:1–6CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Uslu HY, Erkek AB, Cakmak A et al (2007) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 17:600–603CrossRef Uslu HY, Erkek AB, Cakmak A et al (2007) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 17:600–603CrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Azurin DJ, Go LS, Arroyo LR, Kirkland ML (1995) Trocar site herniation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the significance of an incidental preexisting umbilical hernia. Am Surg 61:718–720PubMed Azurin DJ, Go LS, Arroyo LR, Kirkland ML (1995) Trocar site herniation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the significance of an incidental preexisting umbilical hernia. Am Surg 61:718–720PubMed
6.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26:1205–1213CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26:1205–1213CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Singh P et al (2013) Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 27:1478–1484CrossRefPubMed Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Singh P et al (2013) Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 27:1478–1484CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Agaba E, Rainville H, Ikedilo O, Vemulapali P (2014) Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. JSLS 18:204–210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Agaba E, Rainville H, Ikedilo O, Vemulapali P (2014) Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. JSLS 18:204–210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Marks J, Phillips M, Tacchino R et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047CrossRefPubMed Marks J, Phillips M, Tacchino R et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Muensterer OJ, Keijzer R (2011) A simple vacuum dressing reduces the wound infection rate of single-incision pediatric endosurgical appendectomy. JSLS 15:147–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Muensterer OJ, Keijzer R (2011) A simple vacuum dressing reduces the wound infection rate of single-incision pediatric endosurgical appendectomy. JSLS 15:147–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Krajinovic K, Ickrath P, Germer CT, Reibetanz J (2011) Trocar-site hernia after single-port cholecystectomy: not an exceptional complication? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 21:919–921CrossRef Krajinovic K, Ickrath P, Germer CT, Reibetanz J (2011) Trocar-site hernia after single-port cholecystectomy: not an exceptional complication? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 21:919–921CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Scheib SA, Fader AN (2014) Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(2):179.e1–179.e179CrossRef Scheib SA, Fader AN (2014) Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(2):179.e1–179.e179CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS et al (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69CrossRefPubMed Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS et al (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27CrossRefPubMed Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 213:72–80CrossRefPubMed Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 213:72–80CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gandhi DP, Ragupathi M, Patel CB et al (2010) Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case matched series. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1875–1880CrossRefPubMed Gandhi DP, Ragupathi M, Patel CB et al (2010) Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case matched series. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1875–1880CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Buckley FP, Vassaur H, Monsivais S et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28:30–35CrossRefPubMed Buckley FP, Vassaur H, Monsivais S et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28:30–35CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Carter JT, Kaplan JA, Nguyen JN et al (2014) A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 218:950–959CrossRefPubMed Carter JT, Kaplan JA, Nguyen JN et al (2014) A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 218:950–959CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Buckley FP, Vassaur H, Monsivais S et al (2014) Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28:626–630CrossRefPubMed Buckley FP, Vassaur H, Monsivais S et al (2014) Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28:626–630CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gonzales AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C et al (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27:4524–4531CrossRef Gonzales AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C et al (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27:4524–4531CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L et al (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147:709–714CrossRefPubMed Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L et al (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147:709–714CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ross SB, Sawangkum P, de La Vega KA et al (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): an initial review of safety and feasibility. Miner Chir 68:435–443 Ross SB, Sawangkum P, de La Vega KA et al (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): an initial review of safety and feasibility. Miner Chir 68:435–443
26.
go back to reference Armañanzas L, Ruiz-Tovar J, Arroyo A et al (2014) Prophylactic mesh vs suture in the closure of the umbilical trocar site after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high-risk patients for incisional hernia. A randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 218:960–968CrossRefPubMed Armañanzas L, Ruiz-Tovar J, Arroyo A et al (2014) Prophylactic mesh vs suture in the closure of the umbilical trocar site after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high-risk patients for incisional hernia. A randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 218:960–968CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Influencing factors for port-site hernias after single-incision laparoscopy
Authors
F. P. Buckley III
H. E. Vassaur
D. C. Jupiter
J. H. Crosby
C. J. Wheeless
J. L. Vassaur
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1512-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Hernia 5/2016 Go to the issue