Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Materno-fetal Medicine

Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population

Authors: Klaus Bodner, Franz Wierrani, Werner Grünberger, Barbara Bodner-Adler

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with elective cesarean sections with planned vaginal delivery.

Methods

A total of 178 women with elective cesarean section were compared with the next parity- and age-matched women presenting in spontaneous labor. Our analysis was restricted to a sample of low-risk obstetrical women. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were the main outcome variables of interest. Maternal morbidity outcome variables included wound infection, trauma, puerperal febrile morbidity and significant blood loss (>500 ml). Neonatal outcomes were captured by Apgar scores, cord pH as well as the occurrence of neonatal infections.

Results

A significantly higher rate of puerperal febrile morbidity (n = 46 vs. 14, p = 0.0001) and wound infections (n = 16 vs. 2, p = 0.0001) could be detected in the elective cesarean section group. Additionally, a significant blood loss > 500 ml was more than twice as frequent in the cesarean section group (n = 22 vs. 10, p = 0.03) with non-significant lower postpartum hemoglobin levels being observed (10.4 vs. 11.2 g/dL, p > 0.05). A significant increase for the use of iron supplementation (n = 146 vs. 122, p = 0.002), analgesics (n = 168 vs. 60, p = 0.0001) and antibiotics (n = 48 vs. 18, p = 0.0001) could be found in the puerperal period and hospital admission was prolonged in elective cesarean section (6.8 vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.0001). Additionally, problems in breastfeeding occurred more frequently in this group (n = 18 vs. 4, p = 0.002). Neonatal complications were generally low in both the groups with no significant differences being observed (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The increased maternal morbidity in elective cesarean section included puerperal febrile morbidity, wound infections as well as breastfeeding problems in the postpartum period. Women should be sufficiently counseled regarding the increased risk of these complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Placek PJ, Taffel SM (1984) Cesarean section delivery rates: United States 1982. Am J Public Health 73:861CrossRef Placek PJ, Taffel SM (1984) Cesarean section delivery rates: United States 1982. Am J Public Health 73:861CrossRef
2.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health (1981) Cesarean childbirth NIH publication No. 82–2067. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda National Institutes of Health (1981) Cesarean childbirth NIH publication No. 82–2067. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
3.
go back to reference Albers L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, McCandlish R, Elbourne D (1999) Distribution of genital tract trauma in childbirth and related postnatal pain. Birth 26:11–17PubMedCrossRef Albers L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, McCandlish R, Elbourne D (1999) Distribution of genital tract trauma in childbirth and related postnatal pain. Birth 26:11–17PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G (1988) Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery—a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 27:27–32PubMedCrossRef Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G (1988) Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery—a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 27:27–32PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Haadem K, Dahlstrom JA, Ling L, Ohrlander S (1987) Anal sphincter function after delivery rupture. Obstet Gynecol 70:53–56PubMed Haadem K, Dahlstrom JA, Ling L, Ohrlander S (1987) Anal sphincter function after delivery rupture. Obstet Gynecol 70:53–56PubMed
6.
go back to reference Al Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk MN (1996) Obstetricians’ personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 347:544PubMedCrossRef Al Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk MN (1996) Obstetricians’ personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 347:544PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Husslein P (2001) Elective cesarean section versus vaginal delivery. Whither the end of traditional obstetrics? Arch Gynecol Obstet 265(4):169–174PubMedCrossRef Husslein P (2001) Elective cesarean section versus vaginal delivery. Whither the end of traditional obstetrics? Arch Gynecol Obstet 265(4):169–174PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Allen VM, O`Connell CM, Liston RM, Baskett TF (2003) Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 102:477–482PubMedCrossRef Allen VM, O`Connell CM, Liston RM, Baskett TF (2003) Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 102:477–482PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wax JR (2006) Maternal request cesarean versus planned spontaneous vaginal delivery: maternal morbidity and short term outcomes. Semin Perinatol 30:247–252PubMedCrossRef Wax JR (2006) Maternal request cesarean versus planned spontaneous vaginal delivery: maternal morbidity and short term outcomes. Semin Perinatol 30:247–252PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, Perinatal Research Branch (1966) The collaborative study on cerebral palsy, mental retardation and other neurological and sensory disorders of infancy and childhood. Part III: manuals. Bethesda United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, Perinatal Research Branch (1966) The collaborative study on cerebral palsy, mental retardation and other neurological and sensory disorders of infancy and childhood. Part III: manuals. Bethesda
11.
12.
13.
go back to reference Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J (2004) Patient choice cesarean: An evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Survey 59(8):601–616CrossRef Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J (2004) Patient choice cesarean: An evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Survey 59(8):601–616CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Penna L, Arulkumaran S (2003) Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynecol Obstet 82:399–409CrossRef Penna L, Arulkumaran S (2003) Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynecol Obstet 82:399–409CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mc Farlin B (2004) Elective cesarean birth: issues and ethics of an informed decision. J Midwifery Womens Health 49(5):421–429CrossRef Mc Farlin B (2004) Elective cesarean birth: issues and ethics of an informed decision. J Midwifery Womens Health 49(5):421–429CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Van Ham MA, van Dongen PW, Mulder J (1997) Maternal consequences of cesarean section. A retrospective study of intraoperative and postoperative maternal complications of cesarean section over a 10 year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 74:1–6PubMedCrossRef Van Ham MA, van Dongen PW, Mulder J (1997) Maternal consequences of cesarean section. A retrospective study of intraoperative and postoperative maternal complications of cesarean section over a 10 year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 74:1–6PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C, Weiss J, Heffner LJ (2007) Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol 109(3):669–677PubMedCrossRef Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C, Weiss J, Heffner LJ (2007) Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol 109(3):669–677PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS (2007) Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 176(4):455–460PubMed Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS (2007) Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 176(4):455–460PubMed
19.
go back to reference Morisson J, Mac Kenzie IZ (2003) Cesarean section on demand. Semin Perinatol 27(1):20–33CrossRef Morisson J, Mac Kenzie IZ (2003) Cesarean section on demand. Semin Perinatol 27(1):20–33CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Irion O, Hirsbrunner Almagbaly P, Morabia A (1988) Planned vaginal delivery versus elective cesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:710–717 Irion O, Hirsbrunner Almagbaly P, Morabia A (1988) Planned vaginal delivery versus elective cesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:710–717
21.
go back to reference Audit Comimission (1997) First class delivery: improving maternity services in England and Wales. Audit commissions Publications, Abingdon Audit Comimission (1997) First class delivery: improving maternity services in England and Wales. Audit commissions Publications, Abingdon
22.
go back to reference Henderson J, Mc Candlish R, Kumiega L, Petrou S (2001) Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108:149–157CrossRef Henderson J, Mc Candlish R, Kumiega L, Petrou S (2001) Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108:149–157CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mazur J, Mikiel-Kostyra K (2000) Determinanats of newborn feeding in materity hospital care. Part II: factors associated with exclusive breast feeding. Ginekol Pol 71:604–611PubMed Mazur J, Mikiel-Kostyra K (2000) Determinanats of newborn feeding in materity hospital care. Part II: factors associated with exclusive breast feeding. Ginekol Pol 71:604–611PubMed
24.
go back to reference Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ et al (2001) Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 97:439–442PubMedCrossRef Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ et al (2001) Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 97:439–442PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Solda G, Salvadori A, Trevisanuto D (2004) Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective cesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr 93(5):643–647PubMedCrossRef Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Solda G, Salvadori A, Trevisanuto D (2004) Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective cesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr 93(5):643–647PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB (2008) Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective cesarean section: cohort study. BMJ 336(7635):85–87PubMedCrossRef Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB (2008) Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective cesarean section: cohort study. BMJ 336(7635):85–87PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population
Authors
Klaus Bodner
Franz Wierrani
Werner Grünberger
Barbara Bodner-Adler
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1525-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2011 Go to the issue