Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Cornea

Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Authors: Anna-Karina B. Maier, Enken Gundlach, Jan Schroeter, Matthias K. J. Klamann, Johannes Gonnermann, Aline I. Riechardt, Eckart Bertelmann, Antonia M. Joussen, Necip Torun

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a standard procedure in patients with endothelial corneal disorders. We investigated the difficulty of unfolding and attaching the graft lamella and its correlation to characteristics of the graft lamella donor, preoperative patient characteristics, and the postoperative outcome.

Methods

After preparation of the graft lamella, we prospectively graded the unfolding of the graft lamella in 169 consecutive DMEK procedures between September 2012 and August 2013 at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin with four different grades. Various donor characteristics and preoperative patient characteristics were analyzed and correlated to the grading. Additionally, visual acuity, corneal thickness and endothelial cell density were measured and correlated.

Results

Donor characteristics (age [range, 49 – 79 years], gender, endothelial cell density, total storage time, storage de-swelling time, postmortem time) did not correlate to the grading. Preoperative visual acuity significantly influenced the grade of unfolding and attaching of the graft lamella (p = 0.023), while all other preoperative parameters (age, gender, indication for DMEK, preoperative endothelial cell density and preoperative central corneal thickness) showed no correlation. Visual acuity improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.001, preoperative 0.73 ±0.43 LogMAR versus 0.31 ±0.28 LogMAR after one month, 0.25 ±0.29 LogMAR after three months, and 0.21 ±0.25 LogMAR after six months). Visual acuity did not differ significantly between the grading groups at any time point postoperatively. After 6 months, the mean loss rate of endothelial cell density was 24.7 %. Grading group IV developed significantly higher endothelial loss after one month, after three months and after six months compared to the other groups (p = 0.039, p = 0.008, p = 0.048). Graft detachment requiring an additional intracameral air injection to fix the graft detachment (re-bubbling) occurred in 61 eyes (38.1 %). In eyes graded IV, more re-bubblings were necessary than in all other groups (grade I: 37.0 %; grade II: 44.7 %; grade III: 43.8 %; grade IV: 50.0 %; p = 0.128; df = 3; χ 2 = 5.676).

Conclusion

There is no correlation between corneal donor tissue characteristics and the degree of difficulty of unfolding using graft lamella older than 49 years. Therefore, it is not possible to select grafts best suited for DMEK surgery on the basis of donor characteristics when the donor age is above 50 years. Preoperative visual acuity influences the grade of difficulty. The rate of graft detachments and endothelial cell loss increases significantly with a more difficult graft unfolding. The proposed grading system may therefore be relevant for postoperative management.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP (2004) A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea 23(3):286–288CrossRefPubMed Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP (2004) A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea 23(3):286–288CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Price FW Jr, Price MO (2005) Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg 21:339–345PubMed Price FW Jr, Price MO (2005) Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg 21:339–345PubMed
3.
go back to reference Price FW Jr, Price MO (2006) Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:411–418CrossRefPubMed Price FW Jr, Price MO (2006) Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:411–418CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J (2006) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 25:987–990CrossRefPubMed Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J (2006) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 25:987–990CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J (2008) Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 145(2):222–227CrossRefPubMed Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J (2008) Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 145(2):222–227CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Heinzelmann S, Hüther S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, Reinhard T, Maier P (2014) Influence of donor characteristics on descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 33(6):644–648CrossRefPubMed Heinzelmann S, Hüther S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, Reinhard T, Maier P (2014) Influence of donor characteristics on descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 33(6):644–648CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dapena I, Ham L, Droutsas K, van Dijk K, Moutsouris K, Melles GR (2011) Learning curve in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: first series of 135 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 118(11):2147–2154CrossRefPubMed Dapena I, Ham L, Droutsas K, van Dijk K, Moutsouris K, Melles GR (2011) Learning curve in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: first series of 135 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 118(11):2147–2154CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Droutsas K, Giallouros E, Melles GR, Chatzistefanou K, Sekundo W (2013) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: learning curve of a single surgeon. Cornea 32(8):1075–1079CrossRefPubMed Droutsas K, Giallouros E, Melles GR, Chatzistefanou K, Sekundo W (2013) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: learning curve of a single surgeon. Cornea 32(8):1075–1079CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Monnereau C, Quilendrino R, Dapena I, Liarakos VS, Alfonso JF, Arnalich-Montiel F, Böhnke M, Pereira NC, Dirisamer M, Parker J, Droutsas K, Geerling G, Gerten G, Hashemi H, Kobayashi A, Naveiras M, Oganesyan O, Orduña Domingo E, Priglinger S, Stodulka P, Torrano Silva J Jr, Venzano D, Vetter JM, Yiu E, Melles GR (2014) Multicenter study of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: first case series of 18 surgeons. JAMA Ophthalmol 132(10):1192–1198CrossRefPubMed Monnereau C, Quilendrino R, Dapena I, Liarakos VS, Alfonso JF, Arnalich-Montiel F, Böhnke M, Pereira NC, Dirisamer M, Parker J, Droutsas K, Geerling G, Gerten G, Hashemi H, Kobayashi A, Naveiras M, Oganesyan O, Orduña Domingo E, Priglinger S, Stodulka P, Torrano Silva J Jr, Venzano D, Vetter JM, Yiu E, Melles GR (2014) Multicenter study of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: first case series of 18 surgeons. JAMA Ophthalmol 132(10):1192–1198CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, Ham L, van Dijk K, Melles GR (2011) Standardized “no-touch” technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 129(1):88–94CrossRefPubMed Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, Ham L, van Dijk K, Melles GR (2011) Standardized “no-touch” technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 129(1):88–94CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Joussen AM, Heussen FM, Joeres S, Llacer H, Prinz B, Rohrschneider K, Maaijwee KJ, van Meurs J, Kirchhof B (2006) Autologous translocation of the choroid and retinal pigment epithelium in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 142(1):17–30CrossRefPubMed Joussen AM, Heussen FM, Joeres S, Llacer H, Prinz B, Rohrschneider K, Maaijwee KJ, van Meurs J, Kirchhof B (2006) Autologous translocation of the choroid and retinal pigment epithelium in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 142(1):17–30CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Heindl LM, Bucher F, Caramoy A, Hos D, Matthaei M, Cursiefen C (2014) Safety of donor tissue preparation and use of descemetoschisis and torn tissue in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 33(10):e7–e9CrossRefPubMed Heindl LM, Bucher F, Caramoy A, Hos D, Matthaei M, Cursiefen C (2014) Safety of donor tissue preparation and use of descemetoschisis and torn tissue in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 33(10):e7–e9CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE (2011) Donor tissue culture conditions and outcome after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 151(6):1007–1018CrossRefPubMed Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE (2011) Donor tissue culture conditions and outcome after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 151(6):1007–1018CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhang J, Patel DV (2015) The pathophysiology of Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy - A review of molecular and cellular insights. Exp Eye Res 130C:97–105CrossRef Zhang J, Patel DV (2015) The pathophysiology of Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy - A review of molecular and cellular insights. Exp Eye Res 130C:97–105CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dirisamer M, van Dijk K, Dapena I, Ham L, Oganes O, Frank LE, Melles GR (2012) Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 130(3):280–291CrossRefPubMed Dirisamer M, van Dijk K, Dapena I, Ham L, Oganes O, Frank LE, Melles GR (2012) Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 130(3):280–291CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
Authors
Anna-Karina B. Maier
Enken Gundlach
Jan Schroeter
Matthias K. J. Klamann
Johannes Gonnermann
Aline I. Riechardt
Eckart Bertelmann
Antonia M. Joussen
Necip Torun
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-2939-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2015 Go to the issue