Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2022

Open Access 07-09-2022 | Infertility | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Predicting success of intrauterine insemination using a clinically based scoring system

Authors: Anna Lena Zippl, Alfons Wachter, Patrick Rockenschaub, Bettina Toth, Beata Seeber

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a predictive score for the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) based on clinical parameters.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the homologous IUI cycles performed at a single university-based reproductive medical center between 2009 and 2017. The primary outcome measure was pregnancy, defined as positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 12–14 days after IUI. Predictive factors for pregnancy after IUI were identified, and a predictive score was developed using a multivariable continuation ratio model.

Results

Overall, 1437 IUI cycles in 758 couples were evaluated. We found a per cycle pregnancy rate of 10.9% and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 19.4%. In a multivariable analysis, the probability of pregnancy was negatively associated with female age ≥ 35 years (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41–0.97, p = 0.034), endometriosis, unilateral tubal factor, or anatomical alteration (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–0.89, p = 0.016), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) < 1 ng/ml (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29–0.87, p = 0.014), and total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC) < 5 mil (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.19–0.72, p = 0.004). We developed a predictive clinical score ranging from 0 to 5. Following 3 cycles, couples in our cohort with a score of 5 had a cumulative probability of achieving pregnancy of nearly 45%. In contrast, couples with a score of 0 had a cumulative probability of only 5%.

Conclusion

IUI success rates vary widely depending on couples’ characteristics. A simple to use score could be used to estimate a couple’s chance of achieving pregnancy via IUI, facilitating individualized counseling and decision-making.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blumenauer V, Czeromin U, Fehr D, Fiedler K, Gnoth C, Krüssel JS, Kupka MS, Ott A, Tandler-Schneider A (2020) D.I.R. annual 2019. J Reprod Med Endocrinol 17:196–239 Blumenauer V, Czeromin U, Fehr D, Fiedler K, Gnoth C, Krüssel JS, Kupka MS, Ott A, Tandler-Schneider A (2020) D.I.R. annual 2019. J Reprod Med Endocrinol 17:196–239
2.
go back to reference Nandi A, Raja G, White D, Tarek E-T (2022) Intrauterine insemination + controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus in vitro fertilisation in unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 305:805–824PubMedCrossRef Nandi A, Raja G, White D, Tarek E-T (2022) Intrauterine insemination + controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus in vitro fertilisation in unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 305:805–824PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Mol BWJ et al (2004) Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 82:45–51PubMedCrossRef Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Mol BWJ et al (2004) Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 82:45–51PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Custers IM, Steures P, van der Steeg JW et al (2007) External validation of a prediction model for an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 88:425–431PubMedCrossRef Custers IM, Steures P, van der Steeg JW et al (2007) External validation of a prediction model for an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 88:425–431PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leushuis E, van der Steeg JW, Steures P et al (2009) Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 15:537–552PubMedCrossRef Leushuis E, van der Steeg JW, Steures P et al (2009) Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 15:537–552PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA et al (1996) Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 11:1892–1896PubMedCrossRef Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA et al (1996) Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 11:1892–1896PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Erdem A, Erdem M, Atmaca S et al (2008) Factors affecting live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles with recombinant gonadotrophin stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 17:199–206PubMedCrossRef Erdem A, Erdem M, Atmaca S et al (2008) Factors affecting live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles with recombinant gonadotrophin stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 17:199–206PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference World Health Organisation (1999) WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge World Health Organisation (1999) WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9.
go back to reference Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S et al (2010) World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 16:231–245PubMedCrossRef Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S et al (2010) World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 16:231–245PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bensdorp AJ, Tjon-Kon-Fat RI, Bossuyt PMM et al (2015) Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. BMJ 350:g7771PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bensdorp AJ, Tjon-Kon-Fat RI, Bossuyt PMM et al (2015) Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. BMJ 350:g7771PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Danhof NA, van Wely M, Repping S et al (2018) Follicle stimulating hormone versus clomiphene citrate in intrauterine insemination for unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 33:1866–1874PubMedCrossRef Danhof NA, van Wely M, Repping S et al (2018) Follicle stimulating hormone versus clomiphene citrate in intrauterine insemination for unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 33:1866–1874PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zolton JR, Lindner PG, Terry N et al (2020) Gonadotropins versus oral ovarian stimulation agents for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 113:417-425.e1PubMedCrossRef Zolton JR, Lindner PG, Terry N et al (2020) Gonadotropins versus oral ovarian stimulation agents for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 113:417-425.e1PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Souter I, Sun F, Zhang H et al (2022) A personalized medicine approach to ovulation induction/ovarian stimulation: development of a predictive model and online calculator from level-I evidence. Fertil Steril 117:408–418PubMedCrossRef Souter I, Sun F, Zhang H et al (2022) A personalized medicine approach to ovulation induction/ovarian stimulation: development of a predictive model and online calculator from level-I evidence. Fertil Steril 117:408–418PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Björndahl L, Barratt CLR, Mortimer D, Jouannet P (2016) “How to count sperm properly”: checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis. Hum Reprod 31:227–232PubMed Björndahl L, Barratt CLR, Mortimer D, Jouannet P (2016) “How to count sperm properly”: checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis. Hum Reprod 31:227–232PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 81:19–25CrossRef Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 81:19–25CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schmid M, Tutz G, Welchowski T (2018) Discrimination measures for discrete time-to-event predictions. Econom Stat 7:153–164 Schmid M, Tutz G, Welchowski T (2018) Discrimination measures for discrete time-to-event predictions. Econom Stat 7:153–164
17.
go back to reference White IR, Royston P, Wood AM (2011) Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 30:377–399PubMedCrossRef White IR, Royston P, Wood AM (2011) Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 30:377–399PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ et al (2001) Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:774–781PubMedCrossRef Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ et al (2001) Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:774–781PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP et al (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 355:13–18PubMedCrossRef Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP et al (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 355:13–18PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K et al (2001) Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:74–81PubMedCrossRef Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K et al (2001) Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:74–81PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Merviel P, Heraud MH, Grenier N et al (2010) Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 93:79–88PubMedCrossRef Merviel P, Heraud MH, Grenier N et al (2010) Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 93:79–88PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Peuker A, Hitzl W, Jäger T et al (2007) Homologe intrauterine Insemination. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 5:97–101CrossRef Peuker A, Hitzl W, Jäger T et al (2007) Homologe intrauterine Insemination. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 5:97–101CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schröder AK, Pelikan S, Tauchert S et al (2004) Prognostische Faktoren für den Erfolg einer intrauterinen Insemination: Eine Evaluation von 1005 Zyklen bei 349 Frauen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 64:1052–1060CrossRef Schröder AK, Pelikan S, Tauchert S et al (2004) Prognostische Faktoren für den Erfolg einer intrauterinen Insemination: Eine Evaluation von 1005 Zyklen bei 349 Frauen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 64:1052–1060CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY et al (2002) Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicles on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 78:1088–1095PubMedCrossRef Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY et al (2002) Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicles on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 78:1088–1095PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Allegra A, Marino A, Sammartano F et al (2014) A “four-cycle program” improves the estimate of the cumulative pregnancy rate and increases the number of actual pregnancies in IUI treatment: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 176:173–177PubMedCrossRef Allegra A, Marino A, Sammartano F et al (2014) A “four-cycle program” improves the estimate of the cumulative pregnancy rate and increases the number of actual pregnancies in IUI treatment: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 176:173–177PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Muthigi A, Jahandideh S, Bishop LA et al (2021) Clarifying the relationship between total motile sperm counts and intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 115:1454–1460PubMedCrossRef Muthigi A, Jahandideh S, Bishop LA et al (2021) Clarifying the relationship between total motile sperm counts and intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 115:1454–1460PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Aboulghar M, Mansour R, Serour G et al (2001) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of unexplained infertility should be limited to a maximum of three trials. Fertil Steril 75:88–91PubMedCrossRef Aboulghar M, Mansour R, Serour G et al (2001) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of unexplained infertility should be limited to a maximum of three trials. Fertil Steril 75:88–91PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice and Practice Committee (2014) Female age-related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589. Fertil Steril 101:633–634CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice and Practice Committee (2014) Female age-related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589. Fertil Steril 101:633–634CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R et al (1999) Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 14:698–703PubMedCrossRef Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R et al (1999) Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 14:698–703PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sahakyan M, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD (1999) Influence of age, diagnosis, and cycle number on pregnancy rates with gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 72:500–504PubMedCrossRef Sahakyan M, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD (1999) Influence of age, diagnosis, and cycle number on pregnancy rates with gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 72:500–504PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Stone BA, Vargyas JM, Ringler GE et al (1999) Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1522–1534PubMedCrossRef Stone BA, Vargyas JM, Ringler GE et al (1999) Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1522–1534PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Speyer BE, Abramov B, Saab W et al (2013) Factors influencing the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI): age, clinical variables and significant thresholds. J Obstet Gynaecol 33:697–700PubMedCrossRef Speyer BE, Abramov B, Saab W et al (2013) Factors influencing the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI): age, clinical variables and significant thresholds. J Obstet Gynaecol 33:697–700PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Hansen KR, He ALW, Styer AK et al (2016) Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 105:1575-1583.e2PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hansen KR, He ALW, Styer AK et al (2016) Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 105:1575-1583.e2PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Fiçicioglu C, Kutlu T, Baglam E, Bakacak Z (2006) Early follicular Antimüllerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 85:592–596PubMedCrossRef Fiçicioglu C, Kutlu T, Baglam E, Bakacak Z (2006) Early follicular Antimüllerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 85:592–596PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J et al (2008) Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 90:737–743PubMedCrossRef Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J et al (2008) Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 90:737–743PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Nelson SM, Messow MC, Wallace AM et al (2011) Nomogram for the decline in serum antimüllerian hormone: a population study of 9,601 infertility patients. Fertil Steril 95(736–41):e1-3 Nelson SM, Messow MC, Wallace AM et al (2011) Nomogram for the decline in serum antimüllerian hormone: a population study of 9,601 infertility patients. Fertil Steril 95(736–41):e1-3
37.
go back to reference Seifer DB, Baker VL, Leader B (2011) Age-specific serum anti-Müllerian hormone values for 17,120 women presenting to fertility centers within the United States. Fertil Steril 95:747–750PubMedCrossRef Seifer DB, Baker VL, Leader B (2011) Age-specific serum anti-Müllerian hormone values for 17,120 women presenting to fertility centers within the United States. Fertil Steril 95:747–750PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Morin SJ, Patounakis G, Juneau CR et al (2018) Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Hum Reprod 33:1489–1498PubMedCrossRef Morin SJ, Patounakis G, Juneau CR et al (2018) Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Hum Reprod 33:1489–1498PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Li HWR, Yeung WSB, Lau EYL et al (2010) Evaluating the performance of serum antimullerian hormone concentration in predicting the live birth rate of controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 94:2177–2181PubMedCrossRef Li HWR, Yeung WSB, Lau EYL et al (2010) Evaluating the performance of serum antimullerian hormone concentration in predicting the live birth rate of controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 94:2177–2181PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Bakas P, Boutas I, Creatsa M et al (2015) Can anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) predict the outcome of intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation? Gynecol Endocrinol 31:765–768PubMedCrossRef Bakas P, Boutas I, Creatsa M et al (2015) Can anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) predict the outcome of intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation? Gynecol Endocrinol 31:765–768PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Dondik Y, Virji N, Butler TS et al (2017) The value of anti-müllerian hormone in predicting clinical pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 39:880–885PubMedCrossRef Dondik Y, Virji N, Butler TS et al (2017) The value of anti-müllerian hormone in predicting clinical pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 39:880–885PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Freiesleben NC, Rosendahl M, Johannsen TH et al (2010) Prospective investigation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in ovulatory intrauterine insemination patients: a preliminary study. Reprod Biomed Online 20:582–587PubMedCrossRef Freiesleben NC, Rosendahl M, Johannsen TH et al (2010) Prospective investigation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in ovulatory intrauterine insemination patients: a preliminary study. Reprod Biomed Online 20:582–587PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference González-Foruria I, Martínez F, Rodríguez-Purata J et al (2019) Can anti-Müllerian hormone predict success outcomes in donor sperm inseminations? Gynecol Endocrinol 35:40–43PubMedCrossRef González-Foruria I, Martínez F, Rodríguez-Purata J et al (2019) Can anti-Müllerian hormone predict success outcomes in donor sperm inseminations? Gynecol Endocrinol 35:40–43PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Seckin B, Tokmak A, Yumusak OH (2019) The role of anti-Müllerian hormone in prediction of pregnancy in young and older women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination. J Chin Med Assoc 82:300–304PubMedCrossRef Seckin B, Tokmak A, Yumusak OH (2019) The role of anti-Müllerian hormone in prediction of pregnancy in young and older women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination. J Chin Med Assoc 82:300–304PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Tiegs AW, Sun L, Scott RT Jr, Goodman LR (2020) Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following intrauterine insemination in young women with decreased versus normal ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 113:788-796.e4PubMedCrossRef Tiegs AW, Sun L, Scott RT Jr, Goodman LR (2020) Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following intrauterine insemination in young women with decreased versus normal ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 113:788-796.e4PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hughes EG (1997) The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 12:1865–1872PubMedCrossRef Hughes EG (1997) The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 12:1865–1872PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Vlahos NF, Coker L, Lawler C et al (2005) Women with ovulatory dysfunction undergoing ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate for intrauterine insemination may benefit from administration of human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 83:1510–1516PubMedCrossRef Vlahos NF, Coker L, Lawler C et al (2005) Women with ovulatory dysfunction undergoing ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate for intrauterine insemination may benefit from administration of human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 83:1510–1516PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Akanji Tijani H, Bhattacharya S (2010) The role of intrauterine insemination in male infertility. Hum Fertil 13:226–232CrossRef Akanji Tijani H, Bhattacharya S (2010) The role of intrauterine insemination in male infertility. Hum Fertil 13:226–232CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Mankus EB, Holden AE, Seeker PM et al (2019) Prewash total motile count is a poor predictor of live birth in intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 111:708–713PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mankus EB, Holden AE, Seeker PM et al (2019) Prewash total motile count is a poor predictor of live birth in intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 111:708–713PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Plosker SM, Jacobson W, Amato P (1994) Predicting and optimizing success in an intra-uterine insemination programme. Hum Reprod 9:2014–2021PubMedCrossRef Plosker SM, Jacobson W, Amato P (1994) Predicting and optimizing success in an intra-uterine insemination programme. Hum Reprod 9:2014–2021PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference OEGRM (2018) Experten-Empfehlung zur hormonellen (monofollikulären) Stimulationsbehandlung OEGRM (2018) Experten-Empfehlung zur hormonellen (monofollikulären) Stimulationsbehandlung
52.
53.
go back to reference Cantineau AEP, Cohlen BJ, Heineman MJ (2007) Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonists/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005356 Cantineau AEP, Cohlen BJ, Heineman MJ (2007) Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonists/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005356
54.
55.
56.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2020) Evidence-based treatments for couples with unexplained infertility: a guideline. Fertil Steril 113:305–322CrossRef Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2020) Evidence-based treatments for couples with unexplained infertility: a guideline. Fertil Steril 113:305–322CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Zhu Q-X, Gao E-S, Pathak N et al (2016) Single or double semen samples: the dilemma in epidemiological studies on semen quality. Hum Reprod 31:511–517PubMedCrossRef Zhu Q-X, Gao E-S, Pathak N et al (2016) Single or double semen samples: the dilemma in epidemiological studies on semen quality. Hum Reprod 31:511–517PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predicting success of intrauterine insemination using a clinically based scoring system
Authors
Anna Lena Zippl
Alfons Wachter
Patrick Rockenschaub
Bettina Toth
Beata Seeber
Publication date
07-09-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06758-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2022 Go to the issue