Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Infertility | Review

Attitude towards assisted reproductive technology: acceptance of donors eggs, sperms, and embryos as treatment of human infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Dereje Bayissa Demissei, Tolesa Diriba Biratu, Eriste Nigussa Gamshe, Ababe Tamirat Deressa

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Assisted Reproductive Technology utilizes human sperm, eggs, or embryos in vitro to produce pregnancy. However, there is no evidence of the acceptance of these technologies by the community.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward the acceptance of donor eggs, embryos, and sperm.

Methods

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (number: CRD42022348036). The Condition, Context and Population (CoCoPop) protocol of the systematic review was used to address the relevant questions regarding the objective of the study. Data were extracted into Excel and pooled estimates were calculated using STATA Version 16.

Results

The pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs, embryos, and sperms was 38.63%, 33.20%, and 31.34%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was high in non-Asian countries (47.78%) and among infertile men (38.60%). Similarly, the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was high in non-Asian countries (47.78%) and among infertile men (28.67%). However, the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor sperm was high in non-Asian countries (37.6%) and among infertile women (28.19%).

Conclusion

The pooled estimate of the prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was higher than the prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor embryos and sperm. Infertile men and non-Asian countries have a higher prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting eggs and embryos, whereas non-Asian countries and infertile women present a higher prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor sperm. Therefore, regulatory bodies and policymakers should modify their rules and regulations to ensure the availability of minimum standards for the ethical and safe practice of donor conception as a treatment for infertility at national and international levels.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683–7.CrossRefPubMed Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2017;108(3):393–406. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2017;108(3):393–406.
3.
go back to reference Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Kovacs GT, Morgan G, Wood EC, Forbes C, Howlett D. Community attitudes to assisted reproductive technology: a 20-year trend. Med Community. 2003;179:536–8. Kovacs GT, Morgan G, Wood EC, Forbes C, Howlett D. Community attitudes to assisted reproductive technology: a 20-year trend. Med Community. 2003;179:536–8.
5.
go back to reference Fortin C, Abele S. Increased length of awareness of assisted reproductive technologies fosters positive attitudes and acceptance among women. Int J Fertility Sterilit. 2016;9(4):452. Fortin C, Abele S. Increased length of awareness of assisted reproductive technologies fosters positive attitudes and acceptance among women. Int J Fertility Sterilit. 2016;9(4):452.
6.
7.
go back to reference Daniluk JC, Koert E. Childless Canadian men’s and women’s childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(8):2405–12.CrossRefPubMed Daniluk JC, Koert E. Childless Canadian men’s and women’s childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(8):2405–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Haug S, Milewski N. Women’s attitudes toward assisted reproductive technologies—a pilot study among migrant minorities and non-migrants in Germany. Federal Inst Popul Res. 2018;43:343–70. Haug S, Milewski N. Women’s attitudes toward assisted reproductive technologies—a pilot study among migrant minorities and non-migrants in Germany. Federal Inst Popul Res. 2018;43:343–70.
9.
go back to reference Milewski N, Haug S. Religious diversity and women’s attitudes toward using assisted reproductive technologies—insights from a pilot study in Germany. J Religion Demogr. 2020;7(1):150–68.CrossRef Milewski N, Haug S. Religious diversity and women’s attitudes toward using assisted reproductive technologies—insights from a pilot study in Germany. J Religion Demogr. 2020;7(1):150–68.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Alon I, Guimon J, Urbanos-Garrido R. Regulatory responses to assisted reproductive technology: a comparative analysis of Spain and Israel. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(8):1665–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alon I, Guimon J, Urbanos-Garrido R. Regulatory responses to assisted reproductive technology: a comparative analysis of Spain and Israel. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(8):1665–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Baccino G, Salvadores P, Hernández ER. Disclosing their type of conception to offspring conceived by gamete or embryo donation in Spain. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013;32(1):83–95.CrossRef Baccino G, Salvadores P, Hernández ER. Disclosing their type of conception to offspring conceived by gamete or embryo donation in Spain. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013;32(1):83–95.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sills ES, Collins GS, Walsh DJ, Omar AB, Salma U, Walsh AP. A descriptive study of selected oocyte, blood and organ/tissue donation features among fertility patients in Ireland. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2010;13(2):98–104.CrossRefPubMed Sills ES, Collins GS, Walsh DJ, Omar AB, Salma U, Walsh AP. A descriptive study of selected oocyte, blood and organ/tissue donation features among fertility patients in Ireland. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2010;13(2):98–104.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hibino Y, Shimazono Y, Kambayashi Y, Hitomi Y, Nakamura H. Attitudes towards cross-border reproductive care among infertile Japanese patients. Environ Health Prev Med. 2013;18(6):477–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hibino Y, Shimazono Y, Kambayashi Y, Hitomi Y, Nakamura H. Attitudes towards cross-border reproductive care among infertile Japanese patients. Environ Health Prev Med. 2013;18(6):477–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Ahmadi A, Bamdad S. Assisted reproductive technologies and the Iranian community attitude towards infertility. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017;20(3):204–11.CrossRefPubMed Ahmadi A, Bamdad S. Assisted reproductive technologies and the Iranian community attitude towards infertility. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017;20(3):204–11.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Afshani SA, Abdoli AM, Hashempour M, Baghbeheshti M, Zolfaghari M. The attitudes of infertile couples towards assisted reproductive techniques in Yazd, Iran: a cross sectional study in 2014. Int J Reprod BioMed. 2016;14(12):761–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Afshani SA, Abdoli AM, Hashempour M, Baghbeheshti M, Zolfaghari M. The attitudes of infertile couples towards assisted reproductive techniques in Yazd, Iran: a cross sectional study in 2014. Int J Reprod BioMed. 2016;14(12):761–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
go back to reference Mohamed SM, Younes EM, El-Deen HA, Abd-Elaliem AA. Assessment of knowledge and attitude of infertile couples about assisted reproductive technology. Assiut Sci Nurs J. 2017;5(12):126–35. Mohamed SM, Younes EM, El-Deen HA, Abd-Elaliem AA. Assessment of knowledge and attitude of infertile couples about assisted reproductive technology. Assiut Sci Nurs J. 2017;5(12):126–35.
18.
go back to reference Fabamwo AO, Akinola OI. The understanding and acceptability of assisted reproductive technology (ART) among infertile women in urban Lagos, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(1):71–4.CrossRefPubMed Fabamwo AO, Akinola OI. The understanding and acceptability of assisted reproductive technology (ART) among infertile women in urban Lagos, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(1):71–4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Adesiyun AG, Ameh N, Avidime S, Muazu A. Awareness and perception of assisted reproductive technology practice amongst women with infertility in Northern Nigeria. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;01(03):144–8.CrossRef Adesiyun AG, Ameh N, Avidime S, Muazu A. Awareness and perception of assisted reproductive technology practice amongst women with infertility in Northern Nigeria. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;01(03):144–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Medenica S, Zivanovic D, Batkoska L, Marinelli S, Basile G, Perino A, et al. The future is coming: artificial intelligence in the treatment of infertility could improve assisted reproduction outcomes—the value of regulatory frameworks. Diagnostics. 2022;12(12):2979.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Medenica S, Zivanovic D, Batkoska L, Marinelli S, Basile G, Perino A, et al. The future is coming: artificial intelligence in the treatment of infertility could improve assisted reproduction outcomes—the value of regulatory frameworks. Diagnostics. 2022;12(12):2979.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Gullo G, Scaglione M, Buzzaccarini G, Laganà AS, Basile G, Chiantera V, et al. Cell-free fetal DNA and non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of chromosomopathies and pediatric monogenic diseases: a critical appraisal and medicolegal remarks. J Personalized Med. 2022;13(1):1.CrossRef Gullo G, Scaglione M, Buzzaccarini G, Laganà AS, Basile G, Chiantera V, et al. Cell-free fetal DNA and non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of chromosomopathies and pediatric monogenic diseases: a critical appraisal and medicolegal remarks. J Personalized Med. 2022;13(1):1.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gullo G, Scaglione M, Laganà AS, Perino A, Andrisani A, Chiantera V, et al. Assisted reproductive techniques and risk of congenital heart diseases in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. 2023;30:1–11.CrossRef Gullo G, Scaglione M, Laganà AS, Perino A, Andrisani A, Chiantera V, et al. Assisted reproductive techniques and risk of congenital heart diseases in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. 2023;30:1–11.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zaami S, Stark M, Signore F, Gullo G, Marinelli E. Fertility preservation in female cancer sufferers:(only) a moral obligation? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022;27(4):335–40.CrossRefPubMed Zaami S, Stark M, Signore F, Gullo G, Marinelli E. Fertility preservation in female cancer sufferers:(only) a moral obligation? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022;27(4):335–40.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):147–53.CrossRefPubMed Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):147–53.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Belur J, Tompson L, Thornton A, Simon M. Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: exploring variation in coder decision-making. Sociol Methods Res. 2021;50(2):837–65.CrossRef Belur J, Tompson L, Thornton A, Simon M. Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: exploring variation in coder decision-making. Sociol Methods Res. 2021;50(2):837–65.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Joanna briggs institute reviewer’s manual, vol. 5. The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017. Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Joanna briggs institute reviewer’s manual, vol. 5. The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017.
28.
29.
go back to reference Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(10):1046–55.CrossRefPubMed Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(10):1046–55.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.CrossRefPubMed Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Shi L, Lin L. The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses. Medicine. 2019;98(23): e15987.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shi L, Lin L. The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses. Medicine. 2019;98(23): e15987.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Fracog JL, Fracog CW. The use of donor eggs and embryos in the management of human infertility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;24(4):265–70.CrossRef Fracog JL, Fracog CW. The use of donor eggs and embryos in the management of human infertility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;24(4):265–70.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Yu L, Peterson B, Inhorn MC, Boehm JK, Patrizio P. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Human Reprod (Oxford, England). 2016;31(2):403–11. Yu L, Peterson B, Inhorn MC, Boehm JK, Patrizio P. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Human Reprod (Oxford, England). 2016;31(2):403–11.
35.
go back to reference Ali S, Sophie R, Imam AM, Khan FI, Ali SF, Shaikh A, et al. Knowledge, perceptions and myths regarding infertility among selected adult population in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:760.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ali S, Sophie R, Imam AM, Khan FI, Ali SF, Shaikh A, et al. Knowledge, perceptions and myths regarding infertility among selected adult population in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:760.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Guo Y-X, Yin Y-J, Tian L. Freeze-all embryo transfer awareness and acceptance of IVF-ET patients in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(47): e5171-e.CrossRef Guo Y-X, Yin Y-J, Tian L. Freeze-all embryo transfer awareness and acceptance of IVF-ET patients in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(47): e5171-e.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kayssan M, Samani RO. Attitudes of infertile couples, fertility clinic staff and researchers toward personhood of the human embryo in Iran. Cell J (Yakhteh). 2017;19:314.PubMedCentral Kayssan M, Samani RO. Attitudes of infertile couples, fertility clinic staff and researchers toward personhood of the human embryo in Iran. Cell J (Yakhteh). 2017;19:314.PubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Straehl J, Lara L, Sá MFS, Reis RM, Rosa ESA. What do infertile women think about oocyte reception, oocyte donation, and child adoption? Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2017;39(6):282–7.CrossRefPubMed Straehl J, Lara L, Sá MFS, Reis RM, Rosa ESA. What do infertile women think about oocyte reception, oocyte donation, and child adoption? Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2017;39(6):282–7.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Gerhard RS, Ritenour CWM, Goodman M, Vashi D, Hsiao W. Awareness of and attitudes towards infertility and its treatment: a cross-sectional survey of men in a United States primary care population. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(6):858–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gerhard RS, Ritenour CWM, Goodman M, Vashi D, Hsiao W. Awareness of and attitudes towards infertility and its treatment: a cross-sectional survey of men in a United States primary care population. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(6):858–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Baccino G, Salvadores P, Hernández ER. Disclosing their type of conception to offspring conceived by gamete or embryo donation in Spain. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2014;32(1):83–95.CrossRef Baccino G, Salvadores P, Hernández ER. Disclosing their type of conception to offspring conceived by gamete or embryo donation in Spain. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2014;32(1):83–95.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Attitude towards assisted reproductive technology: acceptance of donors eggs, sperms, and embryos as treatment of human infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Dereje Bayissa Demissei
Tolesa Diriba Biratu
Eriste Nigussa Gamshe
Ababe Tamirat Deressa
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01741-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Reproductive Health 1/2024 Go to the issue