Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 5/2004

01-10-2004 | Original Article

Infected abdominal sacrocolpopexies: diagnosis and treatment

Authors: T. Fleming Mattox, Edward J. Stanford, E. Varner

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The abdominal sacrocolpopexy is an excellent procedure to surgically treat vaginal vault prolapse. A synthetic graft is often used to support the vaginal apex, but has the potential to become infected or erode, requiring its removal or revision. The purpose of this paper is to report our experience in the management of patients with infected synthetic grafts after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. A review of the patient databases from three specialty gynecology centers was performed from March 1996 to June 2002. Only patients with an infected graft after an abdominal sacrocolpopexy were included in the study; patients with either suture or graft erosion responding to conservative treatment were excluded. Twenty-two women, ages 37–73 years, developed infection of the synthetic graft after an abdominal sacrocolpopexy (1–60 months after their initial surgery, mean 8.8 months). The infected materials included polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, Goretex, n =15) and polypropylene ( n =7). Nine of the 15 PTFE meshes and four of the seven polypropylene meshes were placed at the time of a contaminated case (abdominal hysterectomy [ n =12], colon resection [ n =1]). Eighteen (82%) of the infected grafts involved braided permanent suture to attach the graft to the vaginal wall, monofilament/non-braided permanent suture was used in three patients, and suture type could not be determined in one. All graft removals were attempted vaginally, and this was successful in 16 cases (73%). Two patients experienced significant bleeding: the first patient required an emergency laparotomy and the second patient’s bleeding was controlled with packing. A rectovaginal fistula occurred 3 weeks postoperatively in one patient. Synthetic graft infection should be considered as the differential diagnosis in a patient who has undergone an abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Transvaginal removal is preferred, but is fraught with potentially serious complications. The use of braided permanent sutures to affix the graft to the vagina may be associated with mesh infections.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davila GW, Ghoniem GM, Kapoor DS, Cortreras-Ortiz O (2002) Pelvic floor dysfunction management practice patterns: a survey of members of the international urogynecological association. Int Urogynecol J 13:319–325CrossRef Davila GW, Ghoniem GM, Kapoor DS, Cortreras-Ortiz O (2002) Pelvic floor dysfunction management practice patterns: a survey of members of the international urogynecological association. Int Urogynecol J 13:319–325CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kammerer-Doak DN, Rogers RG, Bellar B (2002) Vaginal erosion of cadaveric fascia lata following abdominal sacrocolpopexy and suburethral sling urethropexy. Int Urogynecol J 13:106–109CrossRef Kammerer-Doak DN, Rogers RG, Bellar B (2002) Vaginal erosion of cadaveric fascia lata following abdominal sacrocolpopexy and suburethral sling urethropexy. Int Urogynecol J 13:106–109CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Scarpero HM, Cespedes Rd, Winters JC (2001) Transabdominal approach to repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Tech Urol 7:139–145PubMed Scarpero HM, Cespedes Rd, Winters JC (2001) Transabdominal approach to repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Tech Urol 7:139–145PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fox SD, Stanton SL (2000) Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition. BJOG 107:1371–1375PubMed Fox SD, Stanton SL (2000) Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition. BJOG 107:1371–1375PubMed
5.
go back to reference Valaitas SR, Stanton SL (1994) Sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective study of a clinician’s experience. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:518–522PubMed Valaitas SR, Stanton SL (1994) Sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective study of a clinician’s experience. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:518–522PubMed
6.
go back to reference Iglesias CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L (1997) The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 8:105–115PubMed Iglesias CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L (1997) The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 8:105–115PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kohli N, Walsh PM, Roat TW, Karram MM (1998) Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 92:999–1004CrossRefPubMed Kohli N, Walsh PM, Roat TW, Karram MM (1998) Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 92:999–1004CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Snyder TE, Krantz KE (1991) Abdomino-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for the correction of vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 77:944–999 Snyder TE, Krantz KE (1991) Abdomino-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for the correction of vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 77:944–999
9.
go back to reference Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Hammons G, Graham C, Heit M (2002) Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1473–1482CrossRefPubMed Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Hammons G, Graham C, Heit M (2002) Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1473–1482CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Visco AG, Weidner AC, Barber MD, Myers ER, Cundiff GW, Bump RC, Addison WA (2001) Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:297–302CrossRefPubMed Visco AG, Weidner AC, Barber MD, Myers ER, Cundiff GW, Bump RC, Addison WA (2001) Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:297–302CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brizzolara S, Pillai-Allen A (2003) Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 102:306–310CrossRefPubMed Brizzolara S, Pillai-Allen A (2003) Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 102:306–310CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Infected abdominal sacrocolpopexies: diagnosis and treatment
Authors
T. Fleming Mattox
Edward J. Stanford
E. Varner
Publication date
01-10-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1170-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

International Urogynecology Journal 5/2004 Go to the issue