Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Published in: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research Article

Infants and the decision to provide ongoing child welfare services

Authors: Joanne Filippelli, Barbara Fallon, Nico Trocmé, Esme Fuller-Thomson, Tara Black

Published in: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Infants are the most likely recipients of child welfare services; however, little is known about infants and families who come into contact with the child welfare system and factors that are associated with service provision. Investigations involving infants and their families present an unparalleled opportunity for the child welfare sector to enhance infants’ safety and well-being through early identification, referral and intervention. Understanding how the child welfare system responds to the unique needs of infants and caregivers is critical to developing appropriate practice and policy responses within the child welfare sector and across other allied sectors. This study examines maltreatment-related investigations in Ontario involving children under the age of one to identify which factors are most influential to predicting service provision at the conclusion of a child welfare investigation.

Methods

A secondary analysis of the fifth cycle of the Ontario Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (OIS) for 2013 was conducted. The OIS is a cross-sectional child welfare study that is conducted every 5 years. The most influential factors that were associated with the decision to transfer a case to ongoing services were explored through a multivariate tree-classification technique, Chi square automatic interaction detection.

Results

There were an estimated 7915 maltreatment-related investigations involving infants in 2013. At least one caregiver risk factor was identified in approximately three-quarters (74%) of investigations involving infants. In the majority of investigations (57%), at least one referral for specialized services was provided. Primary caregiver with few social supports was the most highly significant predictor of the decision to provide ongoing child welfare services. Primary caregiver risk factors were predominant in this model. The analysis identified subgroups of investigations involving infants for which the likelihood of being transferred to ongoing services ranged from approximately 11–97%.

Conclusion

Caregivers of infants are struggling with numerous challenges that can adversely compromise their ability to meet the unique developmental needs of their infant. The findings underscore the importance of community and social supports in decision-making.
Literature
1.
Fast E, Trocmé N, Fallon B, Ma J. A troubled group? Adolescents in a Canadian child welfare sample. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;46:47–54.CrossRef
2.
Trocmé N, Fallon B, MacLaurin B, Sinha V, Black T, Fast E, Hélie S. Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect—2008: major findings—CIS-2008-Rprt-Eng.pdf. Public Health Agency of Canada; 2010.
3.
Putnam-Hornstein E, Simon J, Eastman A, Magruder J. Risk of re-reporting among infants who remain at home following alleged maltreatment. Child Maltreat. 2015;20:92–103.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Montgomery V, Trocmé N. Injuries caused by child abuse and neglect. Toronto: Canadian Child Welfare Research Portal; 2004.
5.
Trocmé N, MacMillan H, Fallon B, DeMarco R. Nature and severity of physical harm caused by child abuse and neglect: results from the Canadian Incidence Study. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 2003;169:911–5.
6.
Barth RP, Scarborough A, Lloyd E, Losby J, Casaneuva C, Mann T. Developmental status and early intervention service needs of maltreated children. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; 2007.
7.
De Bellis MD, Keshavan MS, Shifflett H, Iyengar S, Beers SR, Hall J, Moritz G. Brain structures in pediatric maltreatment-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a sociodemographically matched study. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:1066–78.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Harden BJ. Infants in the child welfare system: a developmental framework for policy and practice. Washington, D.C.: Zero To Three; 2007.
9.
Royal Society of Canada, Canadian Academy of Health Sciences Expert Panel, Boivin M, Hertzman C. Early childhood development: adverse experiences and developmental health. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada; 2012.
10.
Fuller-Thomson E, Brennenstuhl S, Frank J. The association between childhood physical abuse and heart disease in adulthood: findings from a representative community sample. Child Abuse Negl. 2010;34:689–98.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Fuller-Thomson E, Brennenstuhl S. Making a link between childhood physical abuse and cancer: results from a regional representative survey. Cancer. 2009;115:3341–50.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Brown J, Cohen P, Johnson JG, Smailes EM. Childhood abuse and neglect: specificity of effects on adolescent and young adult depression and suicidality. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38:1490–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Brown DW, Anda RF, Tiemeier H, Felitti VJ, Edwards VJ, Croft JB, Giles WH. Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of premature mortality. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:389–96.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Fallon B, Ma J, Black T, Wekerle C. Characteristics of young parents investigated and opened for ongoing services in child welfare. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2011;9:365–81.CrossRef
15.
Klein S, Jones Harden B. Building the evidence-base regarding infants/toddlers in the child welfare system. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33:1333–6.CrossRef
16.
Perry BD. Examining child maltreatment through a neurodevelopmental lens: Clinical applications of the neurosequential model of therapeutics. J Loss Trauma. 2009;14:240–55.CrossRef
17.
Berrick JD. Tender years: toward developmentally sensitive child welfare services for very young children. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
18.
Wulczyn F, Barth RP, Ying-Ying TY, Jones Harden B, Landsverk J. Beyond common sense: child welfare, child well-being, and the evidence for policy reform. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 2005.
19.
Trocmé N, Kyte A, Sinha V, Fallon B. Urgent protection versus chronic need: clarifying the dual mandate of child welfare services across Canada. Soc Sci. 2014;3:483–98.CrossRef
20.
Trocmé N, Fallon B, Sinha V, Van Wert M, Kozlowski A, Maclaurin B. Differentiating between child protection and family support in the Canadian child welfare system’s response to intimate partner violence, corporal punishment, and child neglect. Int J Psychol J Int Psychol. 2013;48:128–40.CrossRef
21.
Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, National Research Council (U.S.). From neurons to neighborhoods: the science of early child development. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000.
22.
Fallon B, Ma J, Allan K, Trocmé N, Jud A. Child maltreatment-related investigations involving infants: opportunities for resilience? Int J Child Adolesc Resielience. 2013;1:35–47.
23.
Fallon B, Van Wert M, Trocmé N, MacLaurin B, Sinha V, Lefebvre R, Allan K, Black T. Ontario incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect—2013 (OIS-2013). Toronto: Canadian Child Welfare Research Portal; 2015.
24.
Black T, Trocmé N, Fallon B, MacLaurin B. The Canadian child welfare system response to exposure to domestic violence investigations. Child Abuse Negl. 2008;32:393–404.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Fallon B, Black T, Nikolova K, Tarshis S, Baird S. Child welfare investigations involving exposure to intimate partner violence: case and worker characteristics. Int J Child Adolesc Resielience. 2014;2:71–6.
26.
Casanueva C, Cross T, Ringeisen H. Developmental needs and individualized family service plans among infants and toddlers in the child welfare system. Child Maltreat. 2008;13:245–58.CrossRefPubMed
27.
McCue Horwitz S, Hurlburt MS, Heneghan A, Zhang J, Rolls-Reutz J, Fisher E, Landsverk J, Stein REK. Mental health problems in young children investigated by U.S. child welfare agencies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51:572–81.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Carter A, Godoy L, Marakovitz SE, Briggs-Gowan MJ. Parental reports and infant-toddler mental health assessment. In: Zeanah CH, editor. Handbook of infant mental health. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2009.
29.
Fluke JD, Casillas K. Rethinking the functioning of child protective services. In: Mathews B, Bross DC, editors. Mandatory reporting laws and the identification of severe child abuse and neglect, vol. 4. Springer: Dordrecht; 2015. p. 443–65.
30.
Herman-Smith R, Schmitt K. Implementing developmental screening programs for infants and toddlers in the child welfare system. J Public Child Welf. 2014;8:416–32.CrossRef
31.
Fallon B, Trocmé N, MacLaurin B, Sinha V, Black T, Felstiner C, Schumaker K, Van Wert M, Herbert A, Petrowski N, Daciuk J, Lee B, DuRoss C, Johnson A. Ontario Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect-2008 (OIS-2008)|Canadian Child Welfare Research Portal. Toronto: Canadian Child Welfare Research Portal; 2010.
32.
Jonson-Reid M. After a child abuse report: early adolescents and the child welfare system. J Early Adolesc. 2002;22:24–48.CrossRef
33.
Jud A, Fallon B, Trocmé N. Who gets services and who does not? Multi-level approach to the decision for ongoing child welfare or referral to specialized services. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34:983–8.CrossRef
34.
DePanfilis D, Zuravin SJ. Assessing risk to determine the need for services. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2001;23:3–20.CrossRef
35.
Fuller T, Nieto M. Child welfare services and risk of child maltreatment rereports: do services ameliorate initial risk? Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;47(1):46–54 (Beyond the Risk Paradigm? Restoring the Client’s Place in Human Service Intervention).CrossRef
36.
Rivaux SL, James J, Wittenstrom K, Baumann D, Sheets J, Henry J, Jeffries V. The intersection of race, poverty, and risk: understanding the decision to provide services to clients and to remove children. Child Welf. 2008;87:151–69.
37.
Fallon B, Ma J, Allan K, Trocmé N, Jud A. Opportunities for prevention and intervention with young children: lessons from the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2013;7:1–13.CrossRef
38.
Fallon B, Trocme N, Fluke J, Van Wert M, MacLaurin B, Sinha V, Helie S, Turcotte D. Responding to child maltreatment in Canada: context for international comparisons. Adv Ment Health. 2012;11:76.CrossRef
39.
Gornick JC, Jäntti M. Child poverty in upper-income countries: lessons from the luxembourg income study. In: Kamerman SB, Phipps S, Ben-Arieh A, editors. From child welfare to child well-being, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 339–68 (Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research).CrossRef
40.
McKay A, Barrett M. Trends in teen pregnancy rates from 1996–2006: a comparison of Canada, Sweden, U.S.A., and England/Wales. Can J Hum Sex. 2010;19:43–52.
41.
Sullivan DJ, van Zyl MA. The well-being of children in foster care: exploring physical and mental health needs. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2008;30:774–86.CrossRef
42.
Hébert M, Collin-Vézina D, Daigneault I, Parent N, Tremblay C. Factors linked to outcomes in sexually abused girls: a regression tree analysis. Compr Psychiatry. 2006;47:443–55.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Thomas EH, Galambos N. What satisfies students? Mining student-opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis. Res High Educ. 2004;45:251–69.CrossRef
44.
Johnson MR, Appleyard K. Infant pychological disorders. In: Bremner JG, Wachs TD, editors. The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of infant development, vol. 1 and 2. 2nd ed. West Sussex: Wiley; 2014. p. 934–61.
45.
Center of the Developing Child at Harvard University. Maternal depression can undermine the development of young children: working paper no. 8.
46.
Tonmyr L, Williams G, Jack SM, MacMillan HL. Infant placement in Canadian child maltreatment-related investigations. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2011;9:441.CrossRef
47.
Williams G, Tonmyr L, Jack SM, Fallon B, MacMillan HL. Determinants of maltreatment substantiation in a sample of infants involved with the child welfare system. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33:1345–53 (Maltreatment of Infants and Toddlers).CrossRef
48.
Ontario Children’s Mental Health. Children’s mental health services for children zero to six: review of the literature and practice guide. Toronto: Children’s Mental Health Ontario; 2002.
49.
Brandt K, Perry B, Seligman S, Tronick E. Developmental psychopathology: core principles and implications for child mental health. In: Brandt K, Perry B, Seligman S, Tronick E, editors. Infant and early childhood mental Health: core concepts and clinical practice. 1st ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2014. p. 249–60.
50.
Godinet MT, Li F, Berg T. Early childhood maltreatment and trajectories of behavioral problems: exploring gender and racial differences. Child Abuse Negl. 2014;38:544–56.CrossRefPubMed
51.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. Excessive stress disrupts the architecture of the developing brain: working paper 3. National National Scientific Council on the Developing Child; 2005.
52.
Sheridan M, Nelson CA. Neurobiology of fetal and infant development: implications for infant mental health. In: Zeanah CH, editor. Handbook of infant mental health. New York: Guilford Press; 2009. p. 40–58.
53.
Easterbrooks MA, Driscoll JR, Bartlett JD. Resilience in infancy: a relational approach. Res Hum Dev. 2008;5:139–52.CrossRef
54.
Connell-Carrick K. Child abuse and neglect. In: Bremner JG, Wachs TD, editors. The Wiley Blackwell handbook of infant development. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. p. 819–45.
55.
Nikolova K, Baird S, Tarshis S, Black T, Fallon B. Examining the response to different types of exposure to intimate partner violence. Int J Child Adolesc Resielience. 2014;2:72–87.
56.
Courtney M, Flynn RJ, Beaupré J. Overview of out of home care in the USA and Canada. Psychosoc Interv. 2013;22:163–73.CrossRef
57.
Mulcahy M, Trocme N. Children and youth in out-of home care in Canada. Montreal: McGill University, Centre for Research on Children and Families; 2010.
58.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. Young children develop in an environment of relationships. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child; 2004.
Metadata
Title
Infants and the decision to provide ongoing child welfare services
Authors
Joanne Filippelli
Barbara Fallon
Nico Trocmé
Esme Fuller-Thomson
Tara Black
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1753-2000
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-017-0162-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research Article

The association of monthly, diurnal and circadian variations with suicide attempts by young people

Research Article

The role of self-esteem in the development of psychiatric problems: a three-year prospective study in a clinical sample of adolescents

Research Article

Mental health literacy in adolescents: ability to recognise problems, helpful interventions and outcomes

Review

Overdiagnosis of mental disorders in children and adolescents (in developed countries)

Research article

Effect of attention-deficit–hyperactivity-disorder training program on the knowledge and attitudes of primary school teachers in Kaduna, North West Nigeria

Research article

Relations of mother’s sense of coherence and childrearing style with child’s social skills in preschoolers