Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Inequities in utilization of prenatal care: a population-based study in the Canadian province of Manitoba

Authors: Maureen I. Heaman, Patricia J. Martens, Marni D. Brownell, Mariette J. Chartier, Kellie R. Thiessen, Shelley A. Derksen, Michael E. Helewa

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ensuring high quality and equitable maternity services is important to promote positive pregnancy outcomes. Despite a universal health care system, previous research shows neighborhood-level inequities in utilization of prenatal care in Manitoba, Canada. The purpose of this population-based retrospective cohort study was to describe prenatal care utilization among women giving birth in Manitoba, and to determine individual-level factors associated with inadequate prenatal care.

Methods

We studied women giving birth in Manitoba from 2004/05–2008/09 using data from a repository of de-identified administrative databases at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. The proportion of women receiving inadequate prenatal care was calculated using a utilization index. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with inadequate prenatal care for the population, and for a subset with more detailed risk information.

Results

Overall, 11.5% of women in Manitoba received inadequate, 51.0% intermediate, 33.3% adequate, and 4.1% intensive prenatal care (N = 68,132). Factors associated with inadequate prenatal care in the population-based model (N = 64,166) included northern or rural residence, young maternal age (at current and first birth), lone parent, parity 4 or more, short inter-pregnancy interval, receiving income assistance, and living in a low-income neighborhood. Medical conditions such as multiple birth, hypertensive disorders, antepartum hemorrhage, diabetes, and prenatal psychological distress were associated with lower odds of inadequate prenatal care. In the subset model (N = 55,048), the previous factors remained significant, with additional factors being maternal education less than high school, social isolation, and prenatal smoking, alcohol, and/or illicit drug use.

Conclusion

The rate of inadequate prenatal care in Manitoba ranged from 10.5–12.5%, and increased significantly over the study period. Factors associated with inadequate prenatal care included geographic, demographic, socioeconomic, and pregnancy-related factors. Rates of inadequate prenatal care varied across geographic regions, indicating persistent inequities in use of prenatal care. Inadequate prenatal care was associated with several individual indicators of social disadvantage, such as low income, education less than high school, and social isolation. These findings can inform policy makers and program planners about regions and populations most at-risk for inadequate prenatal care and assist with development of initiatives to reduce inequities in utilization of prenatal care.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference D'Ascoli PT, Alexander GR, Petersen J, Kogan MD. Parental factors influencing patterns of prenatal care utilization. J Perinatol. 1997;17:283–7.PubMed D'Ascoli PT, Alexander GR, Petersen J, Kogan MD. Parental factors influencing patterns of prenatal care utilization. J Perinatol. 1997;17:283–7.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. NatlVital StatRep. 2006;55:1–101. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. NatlVital StatRep. 2006;55:1–101.
5.
go back to reference Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67:1–55.PubMed Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67:1–55.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report, 2008 Edition. Ottawa: Author. p. 2008. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report, 2008 Edition. Ottawa: Author. p. 2008.
7.
go back to reference Public Health Agency of Canada. Perinatal Health Indicators for Canada 2013: A report of the Canadian perinatal surveillance system. Ottawa, 2013. Public Health Agency of Canada. Perinatal Health Indicators for Canada 2013: A report of the Canadian perinatal surveillance system. Ottawa, 2013.
8.
go back to reference Mustard CA, Roos NP. The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1450–7.CrossRef Mustard CA, Roos NP. The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1450–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heaman MI, Green CG, Newburn-Cook CV, Elliott LJ, Helewa ME. Social inequalities in use of prenatal care in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29:806–16.CrossRef Heaman MI, Green CG, Newburn-Cook CV, Elliott LJ, Helewa ME. Social inequalities in use of prenatal care in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29:806–16.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Marmot M, Friel S, et al. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity though action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–9.CrossRef Marmot M, Friel S, et al. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity though action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Partridge S, Balayla J, Holcroft CA, Abenhaim HA. Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years. Amer J Perinatol. 2012;29:787–93.CrossRef Partridge S, Balayla J, Holcroft CA, Abenhaim HA. Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years. Amer J Perinatol. 2012;29:787–93.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chu SY, Callaghan WM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK. Postpartum care visits – 11 states and new York City, 2004. CDC MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:1312–6. Chu SY, Callaghan WM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK. Postpartum care visits – 11 states and new York City, 2004. CDC MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:1312–6.
14.
go back to reference Chi DL, Momany ET, Jones MP, Kuthy RA, Askelson NM, Wehby GL, Damiano PC. An explanatory model of factors related to well baby visits by age three years for medicaid-enrolled infants: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1). Chi DL, Momany ET, Jones MP, Kuthy RA, Askelson NM, Wehby GL, Damiano PC. An explanatory model of factors related to well baby visits by age three years for medicaid-enrolled infants: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1).
16.
go back to reference Feijen-De Jong EI, Jansen DE, Baarveld F, Van Der Schans CP, Schellevis FG, Reijneveld SA. Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: a systematic review. EurJ Public Health. 2012;22:904–13.CrossRef Feijen-De Jong EI, Jansen DE, Baarveld F, Van Der Schans CP, Schellevis FG, Reijneveld SA. Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: a systematic review. EurJ Public Health. 2012;22:904–13.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Heaman M, Moffatt M, Elliott L, Sword W, Helewa M, Morris H, Gregory P, Tjaden L, Cook C. Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14:227.CrossRef Heaman M, Moffatt M, Elliott L, Sword W, Helewa M, Morris H, Gregory P, Tjaden L, Cook C. Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14:227.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Heaman MI, Gupton AL, Moffatt ME. Prevalence and predictors of inadequate prenatal care: a comparison of aboriginal and non-aboriginal women in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005;27:237–46.CrossRef Heaman MI, Gupton AL, Moffatt ME. Prevalence and predictors of inadequate prenatal care: a comparison of aboriginal and non-aboriginal women in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005;27:237–46.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hiebert S. The utilization of antenatal services in remote Manitoba first nations communities. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2001;60:64–71.PubMed Hiebert S. The utilization of antenatal services in remote Manitoba first nations communities. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2001;60:64–71.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sword W. Prenatal care use among women of low income: a matter of "taking care of self". QualHealth Res. 2003;13:319–32. Sword W. Prenatal care use among women of low income: a matter of "taking care of self". QualHealth Res. 2003;13:319–32.
22.
go back to reference Tough SC, Newburn-Cook CV, Faber AJ, White DE, Fraser-Lee NJ, Frick C. The relationship between self-reported emotional health, demographics, and perceived satisfaction with prenatal care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2004;17:26–38.CrossRef Tough SC, Newburn-Cook CV, Faber AJ, White DE, Fraser-Lee NJ, Frick C. The relationship between self-reported emotional health, demographics, and perceived satisfaction with prenatal care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2004;17:26–38.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Thiessen K, Heaman M, Mignone J, Martens P, Robinson K. Trends in midwifery use in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37:707–14.CrossRef Thiessen K, Heaman M, Mignone J, Martens P, Robinson K. Trends in midwifery use in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37:707–14.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Brownell M, Chartier M, Santos R, Au W, Roos N, Girard D. Evaluation of a newborn screen for predicting out-of-home placement. Child Maltreatment. 2011;16:239–49.CrossRef Brownell M, Chartier M, Santos R, Au W, Roos N, Girard D. Evaluation of a newborn screen for predicting out-of-home placement. Child Maltreatment. 2011;16:239–49.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Roos LL, Brownell M, Lix L, Roos NP, Walld R, MacWilliam L. From health research to social research: privacy, methods, approaches. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:117–29.CrossRef Roos LL, Brownell M, Lix L, Roos NP, Walld R, MacWilliam L. From health research to social research: privacy, methods, approaches. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:117–29.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Healthy beginnings: guidelines for care during pregnancy and childbirth. Ottawa: SOGC; 1998. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Healthy beginnings: guidelines for care during pregnancy and childbirth. Ottawa: SOGC; 1998.
35.
go back to reference American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: author; 2012. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: author; 2012.
36.
go back to reference Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices. Public Health Rep. 1996;111:408–18.PubMedPubMedCentral Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices. Public Health Rep. 1996;111:408–18.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Jack BW, Allen MC. The association between adequacy of prenatal care utilization and subsequent pediatric care utilization in the United States. Pediatrics. 1998;102:25–30.CrossRef Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Jack BW, Allen MC. The association between adequacy of prenatal care utilization and subsequent pediatric care utilization in the United States. Pediatrics. 1998;102:25–30.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Heaman M, Newburn-Cook C, Green C, Elliott L, Helewa M. Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2008;8:15.CrossRef Heaman M, Newburn-Cook C, Green C, Elliott L, Helewa M. Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2008;8:15.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Beeckman K, Louckx F, Putman K. Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan regions. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:527.CrossRef Beeckman K, Louckx F, Putman K. Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan regions. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:527.CrossRef
40.
42.
go back to reference Alexander GR, Cornely DA. Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med. 1987;3:243–53.CrossRef Alexander GR, Cornely DA. Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med. 1987;3:243–53.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Public Health Agency of Canada. What Mothers Say. Ottawa: The Canadian maternity experiences survey; 2009. Public Health Agency of Canada. What Mothers Say. Ottawa: The Canadian maternity experiences survey; 2009.
45.
go back to reference Ayoola AB, et al. Time of pregnancy recognition and prenatal care use: a population-based study in the United States. Birth. 2010;37:37–43.CrossRef Ayoola AB, et al. Time of pregnancy recognition and prenatal care use: a population-based study in the United States. Birth. 2010;37:37–43.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Delvaux T, Buekens P, Godin I, Boutsen M. Barriers to prenatal care in Europe. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21:52–9.CrossRef Delvaux T, Buekens P, Godin I, Boutsen M. Barriers to prenatal care in Europe. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21:52–9.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1414–20.CrossRef Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1414–20.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Sword W. A socio-ecological approach to understanding barriers to prenatal care for women of low income. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29:1170–7.CrossRef Sword W. A socio-ecological approach to understanding barriers to prenatal care for women of low income. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29:1170–7.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference United States (U.S.) Department of Health and Human Services. Expanded Data From the New Birth Certificate, 2008. National vital statistics reports. 2011; 59(7). United States (U.S.) Department of Health and Human Services. Expanded Data From the New Birth Certificate, 2008. National vital statistics reports. 2011; 59(7).
53.
go back to reference Corbett S, Chelimo C, Okesene-Gafa K. Barriers to early initiation of antenatal care in a multi-ethnic sample in South Auckland. New Zealand NZ Med J. 2014;127:53–61. Corbett S, Chelimo C, Okesene-Gafa K. Barriers to early initiation of antenatal care in a multi-ethnic sample in South Auckland. New Zealand NZ Med J. 2014;127:53–61.
55.
go back to reference Rowe RE, Magee H, Quigley MA, Heron P, Brocklehurst P. Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England. Public Health. 2008;122:1363–72.CrossRef Rowe RE, Magee H, Quigley MA, Heron P, Brocklehurst P. Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England. Public Health. 2008;122:1363–72.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Wendt A, Gibbs CM, Peters S, Hogue C. Impact of increasing inter-pregnancy interval on maternal and infant health. Paed Per Epid. 2012;26(1):239–58. Wendt A, Gibbs CM, Peters S, Hogue C. Impact of increasing inter-pregnancy interval on maternal and infant health. Paed Per Epid. 2012;26(1):239–58.
59.
go back to reference Petrou S, Kupek E, Vause S, Maresh M. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1123–34.CrossRef Petrou S, Kupek E, Vause S, Maresh M. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1123–34.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Krans EE, Davis MM, Schwarz EB. Psychosocial risk, prenatal counseling and maternal behavior: findings from PRAMS, 2004-2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:141 e141–7.CrossRef Krans EE, Davis MM, Schwarz EB. Psychosocial risk, prenatal counseling and maternal behavior: findings from PRAMS, 2004-2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:141 e141–7.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:306–16.CrossRef Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:306–16.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Heaman M, Bayrampour H, Kingston D, Blondel B, Gissler M, Roth C, Alexander S, Gagnon A. Migrant women’s utilization of prenatal care: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:816–36.CrossRef Heaman M, Bayrampour H, Kingston D, Blondel B, Gissler M, Roth C, Alexander S, Gagnon A. Migrant women’s utilization of prenatal care: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:816–36.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Di Lallo S. Prenatal care through the eyes of Canadian aboriginal women. Nurs Womens Health. 2014;18:38–46.CrossRef Di Lallo S. Prenatal care through the eyes of Canadian aboriginal women. Nurs Womens Health. 2014;18:38–46.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Marmot M. Universal health coverage and social determinants of health. Lancet. 2013;382:1227–8.CrossRef Marmot M. Universal health coverage and social determinants of health. Lancet. 2013;382:1227–8.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Handler A, Johnson K. A call to revisit the prenatal period as a focus for action within the reproductive and perinatal care continuum. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20:2217–27.CrossRef Handler A, Johnson K. A call to revisit the prenatal period as a focus for action within the reproductive and perinatal care continuum. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20:2217–27.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Sutherland G, Yelland J, Brown S. Social inequalities in the organization of pregnancy care in a universally funded public health care system. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:288–96.CrossRef Sutherland G, Yelland J, Brown S. Social inequalities in the organization of pregnancy care in a universally funded public health care system. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:288–96.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Gavin AR, Nurius P, Logan-Greene P. Mediators of adverse birth outcomes among socially disadvantaged women. J Women's Health. 2012;21:634–42.CrossRef Gavin AR, Nurius P, Logan-Greene P. Mediators of adverse birth outcomes among socially disadvantaged women. J Women's Health. 2012;21:634–42.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Heaman MI, Sword W, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Helewa ME, Morris H, Gregory P, Tjaden L, Cook C. Barriers and facilitators related to use of prenatal care by inner-city women: perceptions of health care providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:2.CrossRef Heaman MI, Sword W, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Helewa ME, Morris H, Gregory P, Tjaden L, Cook C. Barriers and facilitators related to use of prenatal care by inner-city women: perceptions of health care providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:2.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Heaman M, Sword W, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Helewa M, Morris H, Tjaden L, Gregory P, Cook C. Perceptions of barriers, Facilitators and Motivators related to use of Prenatal Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Inner-City Women in Winnipeg. SAGE Open Med. 2015;3:2050312115621314.CrossRef Heaman M, Sword W, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Helewa M, Morris H, Tjaden L, Gregory P, Cook C. Perceptions of barriers, Facilitators and Motivators related to use of Prenatal Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Inner-City Women in Winnipeg. SAGE Open Med. 2015;3:2050312115621314.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Heaman M, Tjaden L, Chang ZM, Morris M, Helewa M, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Sword W, Kingston D. Quantitative evaluation of the Partners in Inner-City Integrated Prenatal Care Project [abstract]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38:488. Heaman M, Tjaden L, Chang ZM, Morris M, Helewa M, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Sword W, Kingston D. Quantitative evaluation of the Partners in Inner-City Integrated Prenatal Care Project [abstract]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38:488.
73.
go back to reference Heaman M, Tjaden L, Chang ZM, Morris M, Helewa M, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Sword W, Kingston D. Evaluation of the Partners in Inner-City Integrated Prenatal Care Project: perspectives of women and health care providers [abstract]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38:487–8.CrossRef Heaman M, Tjaden L, Chang ZM, Morris M, Helewa M, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Sword W, Kingston D. Evaluation of the Partners in Inner-City Integrated Prenatal Care Project: perspectives of women and health care providers [abstract]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38:487–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Inequities in utilization of prenatal care: a population-based study in the Canadian province of Manitoba
Authors
Maureen I. Heaman
Patricia J. Martens
Marni D. Brownell
Mariette J. Chartier
Kellie R. Thiessen
Shelley A. Derksen
Michael E. Helewa
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2061-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue