Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Inequalities in multiple health outcomes by education, sex, and race in 93 US counties: Why we should measure them all

Authors: Yukiko Asada, Alyce Whipp, David Kindig, Beverly Billard, Barbara Rudolph

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Regular reporting of health inequalities is essential to monitoring progress of efforts to reduce health inequalities. While reporting of population health became increasingly common, reporting of a subpopulation group breakdown of each indicator of the health of the population is rarely a standard practice. This study reports education-, sex-, and race-related inequalities in four health outcomes in each of the selected 93 counties in the United States in a systematic and comparable manner.

Methods

This study is a cross-sectional analysis of large, publicly available data, 2008, 2009, and 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Selected Metropolitan/Micropolitan Area Risk Trends (SMART) and 2008, 2009, and 2010 United States Birth Records from the National Vital Statistics System. The study population is American adults older than 25 years of age residing in the selected 93 counties, representing about 30% of the US population, roughly equally covering all geographic regions of the country. Main outcome measures are: (1) Attribute (group characteristic)-specific inequality: education-, sex-, or race-specific inequality in each of the four health outcomes (poor or fair health, poor physical health days, poor mental health days, and low birthweight) in each county; (2) Overall inequality: the average of these three attribute-specific inequalities for each health outcome in each county; and (3) Summary inequality in total morbidity: the weighted average of the overall inequalities across the four health outcomes in each county.

Results

The range of inequality across the counties differed considerably by health outcome; inequality in poor or fair health had the widest range and the highest median among inequalities in all health outcomes. In more than 70% of the counties, education-specific inequality was the largest in all health outcomes except for low birthweight.

Conclusions

It is feasible to extend population health reporting to include reporting of a subpopulation group breakdown of each indicator of the health of the population at a small jurisdictional level using publicly available data. No single group characteristic or health outcome represents the whole picture of health inequalities in a population. Examining multiple group characteristics and outcomes in a comparable manner is essential in reporting health inequalities.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Graham H: Social determinants and their unequal distribution: clarifying policy understandings. Milbank Q. 2004, 82: 101-124. 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00303.x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Graham H: Social determinants and their unequal distribution: clarifying policy understandings. Milbank Q. 2004, 82: 101-124. 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00303.x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Truman BI, Smith KC, Roy K, Chen Z, Moonesinghe R, Zhu J, Crawford CD, Zaza S: Rationale for regular reporting on health disparities and inequalities - United States. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011, 60 (Suppl 01): 3-10.PubMed Truman BI, Smith KC, Roy K, Chen Z, Moonesinghe R, Zhu J, Crawford CD, Zaza S: Rationale for regular reporting on health disparities and inequalities - United States. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011, 60 (Suppl 01): 3-10.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, AlMazroa MA, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basanez M-G, Baxter A, Bell ML: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013, 380: 2197-2223.CrossRef Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, AlMazroa MA, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basanez M-G, Baxter A, Bell ML: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013, 380: 2197-2223.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR: Why are some people healthy and others not?: The determinants of the health of populations. 1994, New York: Aldine de Gruyter Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR: Why are some people healthy and others not?: The determinants of the health of populations. 1994, New York: Aldine de Gruyter
12.
go back to reference Gastwirth JL: A graphical summary of disparities in health care and related summary measures. J Stat Plan and Infer. 2007, 137: 1059-1065. 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.06.024.CrossRef Gastwirth JL: A graphical summary of disparities in health care and related summary measures. J Stat Plan and Infer. 2007, 137: 1059-1065. 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.06.024.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference StataCorp: Stata statistical software: Release 11.0. 2009 StataCorp: Stata statistical software: Release 11.0. 2009
15.
go back to reference Paruolo P, Saisana M, Saltelli A: Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science?. J Royal Stat Soc: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2013, 176: 609-634. 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01059.x.CrossRef Paruolo P, Saisana M, Saltelli A: Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science?. J Royal Stat Soc: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2013, 176: 609-634. 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01059.x.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Decancq K, Lugo MA: Weights in multidimensional indices of wellbeing: an overview. Econ Rev. 2013, 32: 7-34. 10.1080/07474938.2012.690641.CrossRef Decancq K, Lugo MA: Weights in multidimensional indices of wellbeing: an overview. Econ Rev. 2013, 32: 7-34. 10.1080/07474938.2012.690641.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR: The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff. 2002, 21: 78-93.CrossRef McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR: The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff. 2002, 21: 78-93.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Inequalities in multiple health outcomes by education, sex, and race in 93 US counties: Why we should measure them all
Authors
Yukiko Asada
Alyce Whipp
David Kindig
Beverly Billard
Barbara Rudolph
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-13-47

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2014 Go to the issue