Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2/2005

01-02-2005 | Review Article

Individualised Cancer Chemotherapy: Strategies and Performance of Prospective Studies on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring with Dose Adaptation

A Review

Authors: Dr Milly E. de Jonge, Alwin D. R. Huitema, Jan H. M. Schellens, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, Jos H. Beijnen

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 2/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly used in clinical practice for the optimisation of drug treatment. Although pharmacokinetic variability is an established factor involved in the variation of therapeutic outcome of many chemotherapeutic agents, the use of TDM in the field of oncology has been limited thus far. An important reason for this is that a therapeutic index for most anticancer agents has not been established; however, in the last 20 years, relationships between plasma drug concentrations and clinical outcome have been defined for various chemotherapeutic agents. Several attempts have been made to use these relationships for optimising the administration of chemotherapeutics by applying pharmacokinetically guided dosage. These prospective studies, individualising chemotherapy dose during therapy based on measured drug concentrations, are discussed in this review. We focus on the way a target value is defined, the methodologies used for dose adaptation and the way the performance of the dose-adaptation approach is evaluated. Furthermore, attention is paid to the results of the studies and the applicability of the strategies in clinical practice. It can be concluded that TDM may contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival and should therefore be further investigated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ratain MJ, Schilsky RL, Conley A, et al. Pharmacodynamics in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8(10): 1739–53PubMed Ratain MJ, Schilsky RL, Conley A, et al. Pharmacodynamics in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8(10): 1739–53PubMed
2.
go back to reference Gibaldi M. Revisiting some factors contributing to variability. Ann Pharmacother 1992; 26(7/8): 1002–7PubMed Gibaldi M. Revisiting some factors contributing to variability. Ann Pharmacother 1992; 26(7/8): 1002–7PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gurney H. Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(9): 2590–611PubMed Gurney H. Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(9): 2590–611PubMed
4.
go back to reference Moore MJ, Erlichman C. Therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology: problems and potential in antineoplastic therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 1987; 13: 205–27PubMed Moore MJ, Erlichman C. Therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology: problems and potential in antineoplastic therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 1987; 13: 205–27PubMed
5.
go back to reference Crom WR, Evans WE. Methotrexate. In: Evans WE, Schentag JJ, Jusko WJ, editors. Applied pharmacokinetics: principles of therapeutic drug monitoring. 3rd ed. Vancouver (WA): Applied Therapeutics Inc., 1992: 29.1–29.42 Crom WR, Evans WE. Methotrexate. In: Evans WE, Schentag JJ, Jusko WJ, editors. Applied pharmacokinetics: principles of therapeutic drug monitoring. 3rd ed. Vancouver (WA): Applied Therapeutics Inc., 1992: 29.1–29.42
6.
go back to reference Van Den Bongard HJGD, Mathôt RAA, Beijnen JH, et al. Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 39(5): 345–67PubMed Van Den Bongard HJGD, Mathôt RAA, Beijnen JH, et al. Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 39(5): 345–67PubMed
7.
go back to reference Rousseau A, Marquet P, Debord J, et al. Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 38(4): 315–53PubMed Rousseau A, Marquet P, Debord J, et al. Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 38(4): 315–53PubMed
8.
go back to reference Evans W, Relling M. Clinical pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 1989; 16: 327–36PubMed Evans W, Relling M. Clinical pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 1989; 16: 327–36PubMed
9.
go back to reference Liliemark J, Peterson C. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of anticancer therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 1991; 21(3): 213–31PubMed Liliemark J, Peterson C. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of anticancer therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 1991; 21(3): 213–31PubMed
10.
go back to reference Van Warmerdam LJC, Van Den Bemt BJF, Ten Bokkel Huinink WW, et al. Dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships. Cancer Res Ther Contr 1995; 4: 277–91 Van Warmerdam LJC, Van Den Bemt BJF, Ten Bokkel Huinink WW, et al. Dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships. Cancer Res Ther Contr 1995; 4: 277–91
11.
go back to reference McLeod HL. Therapeutic drug monitoring opportunities in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther 1997; 74(1): 39–54PubMed McLeod HL. Therapeutic drug monitoring opportunities in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther 1997; 74(1): 39–54PubMed
12.
go back to reference Galpin AJ, Evans WE. Therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer management. Clin Chem 1993; 39(11B): 2419–30PubMed Galpin AJ, Evans WE. Therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer management. Clin Chem 1993; 39(11B): 2419–30PubMed
13.
go back to reference Masson E, Zamboni WC. Pharmacokinetic optimization of cancer chemotherapy: effect on outcomes. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 32(4): 324–43PubMed Masson E, Zamboni WC. Pharmacokinetic optimization of cancer chemotherapy: effect on outcomes. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 32(4): 324–43PubMed
14.
go back to reference Grochow LB. Individualized dosing of anti-cancer drugs and the role of therapeutic monitoring. In: Grochow LB, Ames MM, editors. A clinician’s guide to chemotherapy pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1998: 3–16 Grochow LB. Individualized dosing of anti-cancer drugs and the role of therapeutic monitoring. In: Grochow LB, Ames MM, editors. A clinician’s guide to chemotherapy pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1998: 3–16
15.
go back to reference Hon YY, Evans WE. Making TDM work to optimize cancer chemotherapy: a multidisciplinary team approach. Clin Chem 1998; 44(2): 388–400PubMed Hon YY, Evans WE. Making TDM work to optimize cancer chemotherapy: a multidisciplinary team approach. Clin Chem 1998; 44(2): 388–400PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kobayashi K, Jodrell DI, Ratain MJ. Pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic relationships and therapeutic drug monitoring. In: Workman P, Graham MA, editors. Pharmacokinetics and cancer chemotherapy. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1993: 51–78 Kobayashi K, Jodrell DI, Ratain MJ. Pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic relationships and therapeutic drug monitoring. In: Workman P, Graham MA, editors. Pharmacokinetics and cancer chemotherapy. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1993: 51–78
17.
go back to reference Rousseau A, MarquetP. Application of pharmacokinetic modelling to the routine therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2002; 16: 253–62PubMed Rousseau A, MarquetP. Application of pharmacokinetic modelling to the routine therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2002; 16: 253–62PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kobayashi K, Ratain MJ. Individualizing dosing of cancer chemotherapy. Semin Oncol 1993; 20(1): 30–42PubMed Kobayashi K, Ratain MJ. Individualizing dosing of cancer chemotherapy. Semin Oncol 1993; 20(1): 30–42PubMed
19.
go back to reference Canal P, Chatelut E, Guichard S. Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy. Drugs 1998; 56(6): 1019–38PubMed Canal P, Chatelut E, Guichard S. Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy. Drugs 1998; 56(6): 1019–38PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lennard L. Therapeutic drug monitoring for cytotoxic drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 52: 75–87S Lennard L. Therapeutic drug monitoring for cytotoxic drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 52: 75–87S
21.
go back to reference Desoize Robert J. Individual dose adaptation of anticancer drugs. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A(6): 844–51 Desoize Robert J. Individual dose adaptation of anticancer drugs. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A(6): 844–51
22.
go back to reference Grahnen A, Karlsson MO. Concentration-controlled or effect-controlled trials: useful alternatives to conventional dose-controlled trials? Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40(5): 317–25PubMed Grahnen A, Karlsson MO. Concentration-controlled or effect-controlled trials: useful alternatives to conventional dose-controlled trials? Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40(5): 317–25PubMed
23.
go back to reference Grochow LB. Busulphan disposition: the role of therapeutic monitoring in bone marrow transplantation induction regimens. Semin Oncol 1993; 20 (4) Suppl. 4: 18–25PubMed Grochow LB. Busulphan disposition: the role of therapeutic monitoring in bone marrow transplantation induction regimens. Semin Oncol 1993; 20 (4) Suppl. 4: 18–25PubMed
24.
go back to reference Dix SP, Wingard JR, Mullins RE, et al. Association of busulphan area under the curve with veno-occlusive disease following BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17(2): 225–30PubMed Dix SP, Wingard JR, Mullins RE, et al. Association of busulphan area under the curve with veno-occlusive disease following BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17(2): 225–30PubMed
25.
go back to reference Demirer T, Buckner CD, Appelbaum FR, et al. Busulphan, cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation for autologous or syngeneic marrow transplantation for acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia: phase I dose escalation of busulphan based on targeted plasma levels. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17(4): 491–5PubMed Demirer T, Buckner CD, Appelbaum FR, et al. Busulphan, cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation for autologous or syngeneic marrow transplantation for acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia: phase I dose escalation of busulphan based on targeted plasma levels. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17(4): 491–5PubMed
26.
go back to reference Demirer T, Buckner CD, Appelbaum FR, et al. Busulphan, cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation for allogenic marrow transplantation for advanced acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia: phase I dose escalation of busulphan based on targeted plasma levels. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17(3): 341–6PubMed Demirer T, Buckner CD, Appelbaum FR, et al. Busulphan, cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation for allogenic marrow transplantation for advanced acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia: phase I dose escalation of busulphan based on targeted plasma levels. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17(3): 341–6PubMed
27.
go back to reference Chattergoon DS, Saunders EF, Klein J, et al. An improved limited sampling method for individualised busulphan dosing in bone marrow transplantation in children. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20(5): 347–54PubMed Chattergoon DS, Saunders EF, Klein J, et al. An improved limited sampling method for individualised busulphan dosing in bone marrow transplantation in children. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20(5): 347–54PubMed
28.
go back to reference Regazzi MB, Locatelli F, Buggia I, et al. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and plasma monitoring of busulphan in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation [abstract]. Ther Drug Monit 1997; 19: 597 Regazzi MB, Locatelli F, Buggia I, et al. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and plasma monitoring of busulphan in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation [abstract]. Ther Drug Monit 1997; 19: 597
29.
go back to reference Bolinger AM, Zangwill AB, Slattery JT, et al. Target dose adjustment of busulphan using pharmacokinetic parameters in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation for malignancy or genetic disease [abstract]. Blood 1999; 94: 145a Bolinger AM, Zangwill AB, Slattery JT, et al. Target dose adjustment of busulphan using pharmacokinetic parameters in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation for malignancy or genetic disease [abstract]. Blood 1999; 94: 145a
30.
go back to reference Tran HT, Madden T, Petropoulos D, et al. Individualising high-dose oral busulfan: prospective dose adjustment in a pediatric population undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26(5): 463–70PubMed Tran HT, Madden T, Petropoulos D, et al. Individualising high-dose oral busulfan: prospective dose adjustment in a pediatric population undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26(5): 463–70PubMed
31.
go back to reference Guillet P, Monjanel S, Nicoara A, et al. A Bayesian dosing method for carboplatin given by continuous infusion for 120h. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1997; 40(2): 143–9PubMed Guillet P, Monjanel S, Nicoara A, et al. A Bayesian dosing method for carboplatin given by continuous infusion for 120h. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1997; 40(2): 143–9PubMed
32.
go back to reference Johansen MJ, Madden T, Mehra RC, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic study of multicycle high-dose carboplatin followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(4): 1481–91PubMed Johansen MJ, Madden T, Mehra RC, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic study of multicycle high-dose carboplatin followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(4): 1481–91PubMed
33.
go back to reference Chatelut E, Pivot X, Otto J, et al. A limited sampling strategy for determining carboplatin AUC and monitoring drug dosage. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36(2): 264–9PubMed Chatelut E, Pivot X, Otto J, et al. A limited sampling strategy for determining carboplatin AUC and monitoring drug dosage. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36(2): 264–9PubMed
34.
go back to reference Veal GJ, Foot A, McDowell H, et al. Optimization of high dose carboplatin treatment in children with stage IV soft tissue sarcoma (SIOP/UKCCSG MMT 98 study) by real-time pharmacokinetic monitoring [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 2002; 43: 275 Veal GJ, Foot A, McDowell H, et al. Optimization of high dose carboplatin treatment in children with stage IV soft tissue sarcoma (SIOP/UKCCSG MMT 98 study) by real-time pharmacokinetic monitoring [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 2002; 43: 275
35.
go back to reference Desoize B, Dumont P, Manot L, et al. Evaluation prospective d’une méthode d’adaptation de posologie du cisplatine [abstract]. Bull Cancer 1995; 82: 411 Desoize B, Dumont P, Manot L, et al. Evaluation prospective d’une méthode d’adaptation de posologie du cisplatine [abstract]. Bull Cancer 1995; 82: 411
36.
go back to reference Schellens JHM, Planting AS, Ma J, et al. Adaptive intrapatient dose escalation of cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2001; 12(8): 667–75PubMed Schellens JHM, Planting AS, Ma J, et al. Adaptive intrapatient dose escalation of cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2001; 12(8): 667–75PubMed
37.
go back to reference Plunkett W, Iacoboni S, Estey E, et al. Pharmacologically directed Ara-C therapy for refractory leukemia. Semin Oncol 1985; 12 (2) Suppl. 3: 20–30PubMed Plunkett W, Iacoboni S, Estey E, et al. Pharmacologically directed Ara-C therapy for refractory leukemia. Semin Oncol 1985; 12 (2) Suppl. 3: 20–30PubMed
38.
go back to reference Ratain MJ, Schilski RL, Choi KE, et al. Adaptive control of etoposide administration: impact of interpatient pharmacodynamic variability. Clin Pharm Ther 1989; 45(3): 226–33 Ratain MJ, Schilski RL, Choi KE, et al. Adaptive control of etoposide administration: impact of interpatient pharmacodynamic variability. Clin Pharm Ther 1989; 45(3): 226–33
39.
go back to reference Ratain MJ, Mick R, Schilsky RL, et al. Pharmacologically based dosing of etoposide: a means of safely increasing dose intensity. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9(8): 1480–6PubMed Ratain MJ, Mick R, Schilsky RL, et al. Pharmacologically based dosing of etoposide: a means of safely increasing dose intensity. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9(8): 1480–6PubMed
40.
go back to reference Madden T, Crom WR, Mirro J. Disposition of etoposide (VP-16) in children with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990; 47: 206 Madden T, Crom WR, Mirro J. Disposition of etoposide (VP-16) in children with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990; 47: 206
41.
go back to reference Ando Y, Minami H, Saka H, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of etoposide in a 14-day infusion for non-small-cell lung cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res 1996; 87(2): 200–5PubMed Ando Y, Minami H, Saka H, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of etoposide in a 14-day infusion for non-small-cell lung cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res 1996; 87(2): 200–5PubMed
42.
go back to reference Ando Y, Minami H, Saka H, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring in 21-day oral etoposide treatment for lung cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res 1996; 87(8): 856–61PubMed Ando Y, Minami H, Saka H, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring in 21-day oral etoposide treatment for lung cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res 1996; 87(8): 856–61PubMed
43.
go back to reference Joel SP, Ellis P, O’Byrne K, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of continuous infusion etoposide in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(6): 1903–12PubMed Joel SP, Ellis P, O’Byrne K, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of continuous infusion etoposide in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(6): 1903–12PubMed
44.
go back to reference Porter D, Boddy A, Thomas H, et al. Etoposide phosphate infusion with therapeutic drug monitoring in combination with carboplatin dosed by area under the curve: a cancer research campaign phase I/II committee study. Semin Oncol 1996; 23 (6) Suppl. 13: 34–44PubMed Porter D, Boddy A, Thomas H, et al. Etoposide phosphate infusion with therapeutic drug monitoring in combination with carboplatin dosed by area under the curve: a cancer research campaign phase I/II committee study. Semin Oncol 1996; 23 (6) Suppl. 13: 34–44PubMed
45.
go back to reference Joel S, O’Byrne K, Penson R, et al. A randomised, concentration-controlled, comparison of standard (5-day) vs prolonged (15-day) infusions of etoposide phosphate in small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 1205–11PubMed Joel S, O’Byrne K, Penson R, et al. A randomised, concentration-controlled, comparison of standard (5-day) vs prolonged (15-day) infusions of etoposide phosphate in small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 1205–11PubMed
46.
go back to reference Miller AA, Tolley EA, Niell HB. Therapeutic drug monitoring of 21-day oral etoposide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4(7): 1705–10PubMed Miller AA, Tolley EA, Niell HB. Therapeutic drug monitoring of 21-day oral etoposide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4(7): 1705–10PubMed
47.
go back to reference Lowis SP, Price L, Pearson ADJ, et al. A study of the feasibility and accuracy of pharmacokinetically guided etoposide dosing in children. Br J Cancer 1998; 77(12): 2318–23PubMed Lowis SP, Price L, Pearson ADJ, et al. A study of the feasibility and accuracy of pharmacokinetically guided etoposide dosing in children. Br J Cancer 1998; 77(12): 2318–23PubMed
48.
go back to reference Ciccolini J, Monjanel-Mouterde S, Bun SS, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of etoposide: application to therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit 2002; 24(6): 709–14PubMed Ciccolini J, Monjanel-Mouterde S, Bun SS, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of etoposide: application to therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit 2002; 24(6): 709–14PubMed
49.
go back to reference Santini J, Milano G, Thyss A, et al. 5-FU therapeutic monitoring with dose adjustment leads to an improved therapeutic index in head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer 1989; 59(2): 287–90PubMed Santini J, Milano G, Thyss A, et al. 5-FU therapeutic monitoring with dose adjustment leads to an improved therapeutic index in head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer 1989; 59(2): 287–90PubMed
50.
go back to reference Wihlm J, Levêque D, Veiten M, et al. Surveillance pharmacokinétique avec adaptation de posologie du 5-fluorouracile administré en perfusion continue. Bull Cancer 1993; 80: 439–45PubMed Wihlm J, Levêque D, Veiten M, et al. Surveillance pharmacokinétique avec adaptation de posologie du 5-fluorouracile administré en perfusion continue. Bull Cancer 1993; 80: 439–45PubMed
51.
go back to reference Fety R, Rolland F, Barberi-Heyob M, et al. Clinical randomized study of 5-FU monitoring versus standard dose in patients with head and neck cancer: preliminary results. Anticancer Res 1994; 14(6A): 2347–52PubMed Fety R, Rolland F, Barberi-Heyob M, et al. Clinical randomized study of 5-FU monitoring versus standard dose in patients with head and neck cancer: preliminary results. Anticancer Res 1994; 14(6A): 2347–52PubMed
52.
go back to reference Fety R, Rolland F, Barberi-Heyob M, et al. Clinical impact of pharmacokinetically guided adaptation of 5-fluorouracil: results from a multicentre, randomized trial in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4(9): 2039–45PubMed Fety R, Rolland F, Barberi-Heyob M, et al. Clinical impact of pharmacokinetically guided adaptation of 5-fluorouracil: results from a multicentre, randomized trial in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4(9): 2039–45PubMed
53.
go back to reference Gamelin E, Boisdron-Celle M, Delva R, et al. Long-term weekly treatment of colorectal metastatic cancer with fluorouracil and leucovorin: results of a multicentric prospective trial of fluorouracil dosage optimization by pharmacokinetic monitoring in 152 patients. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(4): 1470–8PubMed Gamelin E, Boisdron-Celle M, Delva R, et al. Long-term weekly treatment of colorectal metastatic cancer with fluorouracil and leucovorin: results of a multicentric prospective trial of fluorouracil dosage optimization by pharmacokinetic monitoring in 152 patients. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(4): 1470–8PubMed
54.
go back to reference Gamelin E, Jacob J, Danquechin-Dorval E, et al. Multicentric randomized trial comparing in weekly treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) intensified 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FA) with 5-FU pharmacokinetic monitoring to a constant dose calculated with body surface area [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17: 1039 Gamelin E, Jacob J, Danquechin-Dorval E, et al. Multicentric randomized trial comparing in weekly treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) intensified 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FA) with 5-FU pharmacokinetic monitoring to a constant dose calculated with body surface area [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17: 1039
55.
go back to reference Ychou M, Duffour J, Pinguet F, et al. Individual 5FU-dose adaptation schedule using bimonthly pharmacokinetically modulated LV5FU2 regimen: a feasibility study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 1999; 19(3B): 2229–36PubMed Ychou M, Duffour J, Pinguet F, et al. Individual 5FU-dose adaptation schedule using bimonthly pharmacokinetically modulated LV5FU2 regimen: a feasibility study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 1999; 19(3B): 2229–36PubMed
56.
go back to reference Ploin DY, Tranchand Guastalla JP, et al. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing of intravenous melphalan: a pilot study in patients with advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28A(8/9): 1311–5PubMed Ploin DY, Tranchand Guastalla JP, et al. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing of intravenous melphalan: a pilot study in patients with advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28A(8/9): 1311–5PubMed
57.
go back to reference Delepine N, Desbois JC, Delepine G, et al. Individualisation de posologie de methotrexate haute dose par le dosage des concentrations plasmatiques interet therapeutique dans le sarcome osteohenique. Bull Cancer 1989; 76: 913–8PubMed Delepine N, Desbois JC, Delepine G, et al. Individualisation de posologie de methotrexate haute dose par le dosage des concentrations plasmatiques interet therapeutique dans le sarcome osteohenique. Bull Cancer 1989; 76: 913–8PubMed
58.
go back to reference Delepine N, Delepine G, Cornille H, et al. Dose escalation with pharmacokinetics monitoring in methotrexate chemotherapy of osteosarcoma. Anticancer Res 1995; 15(2): 489–94PubMed Delepine N, Delepine G, Cornille H, et al. Dose escalation with pharmacokinetics monitoring in methotrexate chemotherapy of osteosarcoma. Anticancer Res 1995; 15(2): 489–94PubMed
59.
go back to reference Pignon T, Lacarelle B, Duffaud F, et al. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in adult osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994; 33: 420–4PubMed Pignon T, Lacarelle B, Duffaud F, et al. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in adult osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1994; 33: 420–4PubMed
60.
go back to reference Pignon T, Lacarelle B, Duffaud F, et al. Dosage adjustment of high-dose methotrexate using Bayesian estimation: a comparative study of two different concentrations at the end of 8-h infusions. Ther Drug Monit 1995; 17(5): 471–8PubMed Pignon T, Lacarelle B, Duffaud F, et al. Dosage adjustment of high-dose methotrexate using Bayesian estimation: a comparative study of two different concentrations at the end of 8-h infusions. Ther Drug Monit 1995; 17(5): 471–8PubMed
61.
go back to reference Wall AM, Gajjar A, Link A, et al. Individualized methotrexate dosing in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2000; 14(2): 221–5PubMed Wall AM, Gajjar A, Link A, et al. Individualized methotrexate dosing in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2000; 14(2): 221–5PubMed
62.
go back to reference Conley BA, Forrest A, Egorin MJ, et al. Phase I trial using adaptive control dosing of hexamethylene bisacetamide (NSC 95580). Cancer Res 1989; 49(12): 3436–40PubMed Conley BA, Forrest A, Egorin MJ, et al. Phase I trial using adaptive control dosing of hexamethylene bisacetamide (NSC 95580). Cancer Res 1989; 49(12): 3436–40PubMed
63.
go back to reference Conley BA, Egorin MJ, Sinibaldi V, et al. Approaches to optimal dosing of hexamethylene bisacetamide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 31(1): 37–45PubMed Conley BA, Egorin MJ, Sinibaldi V, et al. Approaches to optimal dosing of hexamethylene bisacetamide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 31(1): 37–45PubMed
64.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Conley BA, Jones RJ, et al. Hexamethylene bisacetamide in myelodysplastic syndrome: effect of five-day exposure to maximal therapeutic concentrations. Leukemia 1992; 6(6): 526–34PubMed Rowinsky EK, Conley BA, Jones RJ, et al. Hexamethylene bisacetamide in myelodysplastic syndrome: effect of five-day exposure to maximal therapeutic concentrations. Leukemia 1992; 6(6): 526–34PubMed
65.
go back to reference Woo MH, Relling MV, Sonnichsen DS, et al. Phase I targeted systemic exposure study of paclitaxel in children with refractory acute leukemias. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5(3): 543–9PubMed Woo MH, Relling MV, Sonnichsen DS, et al. Phase I targeted systemic exposure study of paclitaxel in children with refractory acute leukemias. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5(3): 543–9PubMed
66.
go back to reference Jodrell DI, Reyno LM, Sridhara R, et al. Suramin: development of a population pharmacokinetic model and its use with intermittent short infusions to control plasma drug concentration in patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12(1): 166–75PubMed Jodrell DI, Reyno LM, Sridhara R, et al. Suramin: development of a population pharmacokinetic model and its use with intermittent short infusions to control plasma drug concentration in patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12(1): 166–75PubMed
67.
go back to reference Figg WD, Stevens JA, Cooper MR. Adaptive control with feedback of suramin using intermittent infusions. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12(7): 1523–4PubMed Figg WD, Stevens JA, Cooper MR. Adaptive control with feedback of suramin using intermittent infusions. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12(7): 1523–4PubMed
68.
go back to reference Rosen PJ, Mendoza EF, Landaw EM, et al. Suramin in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer: a drug with limited efficacy. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(5): 1626–36PubMed Rosen PJ, Mendoza EF, Landaw EM, et al. Suramin in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer: a drug with limited efficacy. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(5): 1626–36PubMed
69.
go back to reference Rodman JH, Furman WL, Sunderland M, et al. Escalating teniposide systemic exposure to increase dose intensity for pediatric patients. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11(2): 287–93PubMed Rodman JH, Furman WL, Sunderland M, et al. Escalating teniposide systemic exposure to increase dose intensity for pediatric patients. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11(2): 287–93PubMed
70.
go back to reference Furman WL, Baker SD, Pratt CB, et al. Escalating systemic exposure of continuous infusion topotecan in children with recurrent acute leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(5): 1504–11PubMed Furman WL, Baker SD, Pratt CB, et al. Escalating systemic exposure of continuous infusion topotecan in children with recurrent acute leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(5): 1504–11PubMed
71.
go back to reference Montazeri A, Culine S, Laguerre B, et al. Individual adaptive dosing of topotecan in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8(2): 394–9PubMed Montazeri A, Culine S, Laguerre B, et al. Individual adaptive dosing of topotecan in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8(2): 394–9PubMed
72.
go back to reference Rodman JH, Sunderland M, Kavanagh RL, et al. Pharmaco kinetics of continuous infusion of methotrexate and teniposide in pediatric cancer patients. Cancer Res 1990; 50(14): 4267–71PubMed Rodman JH, Sunderland M, Kavanagh RL, et al. Pharmaco kinetics of continuous infusion of methotrexate and teniposide in pediatric cancer patients. Cancer Res 1990; 50(14): 4267–71PubMed
73.
go back to reference Evans WE, Rodman J, Relling MV, et al. Individualized dosages of chemotherapy as a strategy to improve response for acute lymphocytic leukemia. Semin Hematol 1991; 28 (3) Suppl. 4: 15–21PubMed Evans WE, Rodman J, Relling MV, et al. Individualized dosages of chemotherapy as a strategy to improve response for acute lymphocytic leukemia. Semin Hematol 1991; 28 (3) Suppl. 4: 15–21PubMed
74.
go back to reference Evans WE, Relling MV, Rodman JH, et al. Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1998; 338(8): 499–505PubMed Evans WE, Relling MV, Rodman JH, et al. Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1998; 338(8): 499–505PubMed
75.
go back to reference Heinemann V, Jehn U. Rationales for a pharmacologically optimized treatment of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with cytosine arabinoside. Leukemia 1990; 4(11): 790–6PubMed Heinemann V, Jehn U. Rationales for a pharmacologically optimized treatment of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with cytosine arabinoside. Leukemia 1990; 4(11): 790–6PubMed
76.
go back to reference Schellens JHM, Ma J, Planting AS, et al. Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leukocytes and tumor response in patients with solid tumors. Br J Cancer 1996; 73(12): 1569–75PubMed Schellens JHM, Ma J, Planting AS, et al. Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leukocytes and tumor response in patients with solid tumors. Br J Cancer 1996; 73(12): 1569–75PubMed
77.
go back to reference Karlsson MO, Molnar V, Bergh J, et al. A general model for time-dissociated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships exemplified by paclitaxel myelosuppression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 63(1): 11–25PubMed Karlsson MO, Molnar V, Bergh J, et al. A general model for time-dissociated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships exemplified by paclitaxel myelosuppression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 63(1): 11–25PubMed
78.
go back to reference Gamelin EC, Danquechin-Dorval EM, Dumesnil YF, et al. Relationship between S-fluorouracil (5-FU) dose intensity and therapeutic response in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving infusional therapy containing 5-FU. Cancer 1996; 77(3): 441–51PubMed Gamelin EC, Danquechin-Dorval EM, Dumesnil YF, et al. Relationship between S-fluorouracil (5-FU) dose intensity and therapeutic response in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving infusional therapy containing 5-FU. Cancer 1996; 77(3): 441–51PubMed
79.
80.
go back to reference Egorin MJ, Sigman LM, Van Echo DA, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA, NSC95580) administered as a five day continuous infusion. Cancer Res 1987; 47(2): 617–23PubMed Egorin MJ, Sigman LM, Van Echo DA, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA, NSC95580) administered as a five day continuous infusion. Cancer Res 1987; 47(2): 617–23PubMed
81.
go back to reference Bolinger AM, Zangwill AB, Slattery JT, et al. Target dose adjustment of busulphan using pharmacokinetic parameters in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation for malignancy or inborn errors [abstract]. Blood 1997; 90: 374a Bolinger AM, Zangwill AB, Slattery JT, et al. Target dose adjustment of busulphan using pharmacokinetic parameters in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation for malignancy or inborn errors [abstract]. Blood 1997; 90: 374a
82.
go back to reference Bergh J, Wiklund T, Erikstein B, et al. Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1284–391 Bergh J, Wiklund T, Erikstein B, et al. Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1284–391
83.
go back to reference Poikonen P, Saarto T, Lundin J, et al. Leucocyte nadir as a marker for chemotherapy efficacy in node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant CMF. Br J Cancer 1999; 80(11): 1763–6PubMed Poikonen P, Saarto T, Lundin J, et al. Leucocyte nadir as a marker for chemotherapy efficacy in node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant CMF. Br J Cancer 1999; 80(11): 1763–6PubMed
84.
go back to reference Grochow LB, Jones RJ, Brundrett RB, et al. Pharmacokinetics of busulphan: correlations with veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989; 25(1): 55–61PubMed Grochow LB, Jones RJ, Brundrett RB, et al. Pharmacokinetics of busulphan: correlations with veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989; 25(1): 55–61PubMed
85.
go back to reference Sulkes A, Collins JM. Reappraisal of some dosage adjustment guidelines. Cancer Treat Rep 1987; 71(3): 229–33PubMed Sulkes A, Collins JM. Reappraisal of some dosage adjustment guidelines. Cancer Treat Rep 1987; 71(3): 229–33PubMed
86.
go back to reference Van Warmerdam LJC, TenBokkel Huinink WW, Maes RAA, et al. Limited-sampling models for anticancer agents. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1994; 120(7): 427–33PubMed Van Warmerdam LJC, TenBokkel Huinink WW, Maes RAA, et al. Limited-sampling models for anticancer agents. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1994; 120(7): 427–33PubMed
87.
go back to reference Jelliffe RW, Schumitzky A, Van Guilder M, et al. Individualizing drug dosage regimens: roles of population pharmacokinetic and dynamic models, Bayesian fitting and adaptive control. Ther Drug Monit 1993; 15(5): 380–93PubMed Jelliffe RW, Schumitzky A, Van Guilder M, et al. Individualizing drug dosage regimens: roles of population pharmacokinetic and dynamic models, Bayesian fitting and adaptive control. Ther Drug Monit 1993; 15(5): 380–93PubMed
88.
go back to reference Vozeh S, Steimer JL. Feedback control methods for drug dosage optimisation: concepts, classification and clinical application. Clin Pharmacokinet 1985; 10(6): 457–76PubMed Vozeh S, Steimer JL. Feedback control methods for drug dosage optimisation: concepts, classification and clinical application. Clin Pharmacokinet 1985; 10(6): 457–76PubMed
89.
go back to reference Minto C, Schnider T. Expanding clinical applications of population pharmacokinetic modelling. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46(4): 321–33PubMed Minto C, Schnider T. Expanding clinical applications of population pharmacokinetic modelling. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46(4): 321–33PubMed
90.
go back to reference Bellissant E, Sebille V, Paintaud G. Methodological issues in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998; 35(2): 151–66PubMed Bellissant E, Sebille V, Paintaud G. Methodological issues in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998; 35(2): 151–66PubMed
91.
go back to reference WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1979 WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1979
92.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205–16PubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205–16PubMed
93.
go back to reference Guidelines for reporting of adverse drug reactions. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment, 1988 Guidelines for reporting of adverse drug reactions. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment, 1988
94.
go back to reference Proost JH, Meijer DKF. Mw/Pharm, an integrated software package for drug dosage regimen calculation and therapeutic drug monitoring. Comput Biol Med 1992; 22(3): 155–63PubMed Proost JH, Meijer DKF. Mw/Pharm, an integrated software package for drug dosage regimen calculation and therapeutic drug monitoring. Comput Biol Med 1992; 22(3): 155–63PubMed
95.
go back to reference McCune JS, Gibbs JP, Slattery JT. Plasma concentration monitoring of busulphan: does it improve clinical outcome? Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 39(2): 155–65PubMed McCune JS, Gibbs JP, Slattery JT. Plasma concentration monitoring of busulphan: does it improve clinical outcome? Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 39(2): 155–65PubMed
96.
go back to reference Slattery JT, Risler LJ. Therapeutic monitoring of busulphan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 1998; 20(5): 543–9PubMed Slattery JT, Risler LJ. Therapeutic monitoring of busulphan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 1998; 20(5): 543–9PubMed
97.
go back to reference Calvert AH, Newell DR, Gumbrell LA, et al. Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7(11): 1748–56PubMed Calvert AH, Newell DR, Gumbrell LA, et al. Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7(11): 1748–56PubMed
98.
go back to reference Egorin MJ, Van Echo DA, Olman EA, et al. Prospective validation of a pharmacologically based dosing scheme for the cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) analogue diamminecy-clobutanedi-carboxylatoplatinum. Cancer Res 1985; 45: 6502–6PubMed Egorin MJ, Van Echo DA, Olman EA, et al. Prospective validation of a pharmacologically based dosing scheme for the cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) analogue diamminecy-clobutanedi-carboxylatoplatinum. Cancer Res 1985; 45: 6502–6PubMed
99.
go back to reference Chatelut E, Canal P, Brunner V, et al. Prediction of carboplatin clearance from standard morphological and biological patient characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87(8): 573–80PubMed Chatelut E, Canal P, Brunner V, et al. Prediction of carboplatin clearance from standard morphological and biological patient characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87(8): 573–80PubMed
100.
go back to reference Newell DR, Pearson AD, Balmanno K, et al. Carboplatin pharmacokinetics in children: the development of a pediatric dosing formula. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11(12): 2314–23PubMed Newell DR, Pearson AD, Balmanno K, et al. Carboplatin pharmacokinetics in children: the development of a pediatric dosing formula. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11(12): 2314–23PubMed
101.
go back to reference Gamelin E, Boisdron-Celle M. Dose monitoring of 5-fluorouracil in patients with colorectal or head and neck cancer: status of the art. Clin Rev Oncol Hematol 1999; 30(1): 71–9 Gamelin E, Boisdron-Celle M. Dose monitoring of 5-fluorouracil in patients with colorectal or head and neck cancer: status of the art. Clin Rev Oncol Hematol 1999; 30(1): 71–9
102.
go back to reference Relling MV, Fairclough D, Ayers D, et al. Patient characteristics associated with high-risk methotrexate concentrations and toxicity. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12(8): 1667–72PubMed Relling MV, Fairclough D, Ayers D, et al. Patient characteristics associated with high-risk methotrexate concentrations and toxicity. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12(8): 1667–72PubMed
103.
go back to reference De Jonge ME, Huitema ADR, Van Dam SM, et al. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin in high dose chemotherapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 562 De Jonge ME, Huitema ADR, Van Dam SM, et al. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin in high dose chemotherapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22: 562
104.
go back to reference Liefers GJ, Tollenaar RAEM. Cancer genetics and their application to individualized medicine. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38(7): 872–9PubMed Liefers GJ, Tollenaar RAEM. Cancer genetics and their application to individualized medicine. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38(7): 872–9PubMed
Metadata
Title
Individualised Cancer Chemotherapy: Strategies and Performance of Prospective Studies on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring with Dose Adaptation
A Review
Authors
Dr Milly E. de Jonge
Alwin D. R. Huitema
Jan H. M. Schellens
Sjoerd Rodenhuis
Jos H. Beijnen
Publication date
01-02-2005
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 2/2005
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200544020-00002

Other articles of this Issue 2/2005

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2/2005 Go to the issue