Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Protocol

Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol

Authors: Nelly D. Oelke, Esther Suter, Maria Alice Dias da Silva Lima, Cheryl Van Vliet-Brown

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health system integration is a key component of health system reform with the goal of improving outcomes for patients, providers, and the health system. Although health systems continue to strive for better integration, current delivery of health services continues to be fragmented. A key gap in the literature is the lack of information on what successful integration looks like and how to measure achievement towards an integrated system. This multi-site study protocol builds on a prior knowledge synthesis completed by two of the primary investigators which identified 10 key principles that collectively support health system integration. The aim is to answer two research questions: What are appropriate indicators for each of the 10 key integration principles developed in our previous knowledge synthesis and what measurement tools are used to measure these indicators? To enhance generalizability of the findings, a partnership between Canada and Brazil was created as health system integration is a priority in both countries and they share similar contexts.

Methods/design

This knowledge synthesis will follow an iterative scoping review process with emerging information from knowledge-user engagement leading to the refinement of research questions and study selection. This paper describes the methods for each phase of the study. Research questions were developed with stakeholder input. Indicator identification and prioritization will utilize a modified Delphi method and patient/user focus groups. Based on priority indicators, a search of the literature will be completed and studies screened for inclusion. Quality appraisal of relevant studies will be completed prior to data extraction. Results will be used to develop recommendations and key messages to be presented through integrated and end-of-grant knowledge translation strategies with researchers and knowledge-users from the three jurisdictions.

Discussion

This project will directly benefit policy and decision-makers by providing an easy accessible set of indicators and tools to measure health system integration across different contexts and cultures. Being able to evaluate the success of integration strategies and initiatives will lead to better health system design and improved health outcomes for patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strandberg-Larsen M, Krasnik A. Measurement of integrated health care delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:1568–4156.CrossRef Strandberg-Larsen M, Krasnik A. Measurement of integrated health care delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:1568–4156.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Strandberg-Larsen M. Measuring integrated care: an international comparative study. Dan Med Bull. 2011;58:1–22. Strandberg-Larsen M. Measuring integrated care: an international comparative study. Dan Med Bull. 2011;58:1–22.
3.
go back to reference Shortell SM, McCurdy RK. Integrated health systems. In: Rouse WB, Cortese DA, editors. Engineering the system of health care delivery. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2010. p. 369–82. Shortell SM, McCurdy RK. Integrated health systems. In: Rouse WB, Cortese DA, editors. Engineering the system of health care delivery. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2010. p. 369–82.
8.
go back to reference Hebert J, Veil A. Monitoring the degree of implementation of an integrated delivery system. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:1568–4156.CrossRef Hebert J, Veil A. Monitoring the degree of implementation of an integrated delivery system. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:1568–4156.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference VanDeusen LC, Meterko M, Lowcock S, Donaldson-Parlier R, Blakely M, Davies M, et al. Monitoring the progress of system integration. Qual Manag Health Care. 2002;10:1–11.CrossRef VanDeusen LC, Meterko M, Lowcock S, Donaldson-Parlier R, Blakely M, Davies M, et al. Monitoring the progress of system integration. Qual Manag Health Care. 2002;10:1–11.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Devers KJ, Shortell SM, Gillies RR, Anderson DA, Mitchell JB, Erickson KM. Implementing organized delivery systems: an integration scorecard. Health Care Manage Rev. 1994;19:7–20.PubMed Devers KJ, Shortell SM, Gillies RR, Anderson DA, Mitchell JB, Erickson KM. Implementing organized delivery systems: an integration scorecard. Health Care Manage Rev. 1994;19:7–20.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assessment Res Eval. 2007;12:10. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assessment Res Eval. 2007;12:10.
17.
go back to reference Greenberg J. Behavior in organizations. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education/Prentice Hall; 2011. Greenberg J. Behavior in organizations. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education/Prentice Hall; 2011.
19.
go back to reference Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York, UK: York Publishing Services Ltd; 2009. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York, UK: York Publishing Services Ltd; 2009.
20.
go back to reference Briss PA, Zaza S, Pappaioanou M, Fielding J, Wright-De Aguero L, Truman BI, et al. Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive service—methods [Special issue]. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:35–43.CrossRefPubMed Briss PA, Zaza S, Pappaioanou M, Fielding J, Wright-De Aguero L, Truman BI, et al. Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive service—methods [Special issue]. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:35–43.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Coleman E, Smith J, Frank J, Eilertsen T, Thiare J, Kramer A. Development and testing of a measure designed to assess the quality of care transitions. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:1568–4156. Coleman E, Smith J, Frank J, Eilertsen T, Thiare J, Kramer A. Development and testing of a measure designed to assess the quality of care transitions. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:1568–4156.
24.
go back to reference Fletcher BW, Lehman W, Wexler HK, Melnick G, Taxman FS, Young DW. Measuring collaboration and integration activities in criminal justice and substance abuse treatment agencies [Special issue]. Drug Alcohol Depen. 2009; doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.001. Fletcher BW, Lehman W, Wexler HK, Melnick G, Taxman FS, Young DW. Measuring collaboration and integration activities in criminal justice and substance abuse treatment agencies [Special issue]. Drug Alcohol Depen. 2009; doi:10.​1016/​j.​drugalcdep.​2009.​01.​001.
28.
go back to reference Solberg L, Maciosek M, Edwards N, Khanchandani H, Goodman M. Repeated tobacco-use screening and intervention in clinical practice: health impact and cost effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2006; doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.013. Solberg L, Maciosek M, Edwards N, Khanchandani H, Goodman M. Repeated tobacco-use screening and intervention in clinical practice: health impact and cost effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2006; doi:10.​1016/​j.​amepre.​2006.​03.​013.
30.
go back to reference Spenceley SM, Andres C, Lapins J, Wedel R, Gelber T, Halma LM. Accountability by design: moving primary care reform ahead in Alberta. Sch Public Policy. 2013;6:1–44. Spenceley SM, Andres C, Lapins J, Wedel R, Gelber T, Halma LM. Accountability by design: moving primary care reform ahead in Alberta. Sch Public Policy. 2013;6:1–44.
32.
go back to reference Reilly S, Challis D, Burns A, Hughes J. Does integration really make a difference? A comparison of old age psychiatry services in England and Northern Ireland. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013; doi:10.1002/gps.942. Reilly S, Challis D, Burns A, Hughes J. Does integration really make a difference? A comparison of old age psychiatry services in England and Northern Ireland. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013; doi:10.​1002/​gps.​942.
33.
go back to reference Delon S, Mackinnon B. Alberta’s systems approach to chronic disease management and prevention utilizing the expanded chronic care model [Special issue]. Healthc Q. 2009; doi:10.12927/hcq.2009.21106. Delon S, Mackinnon B. Alberta’s systems approach to chronic disease management and prevention utilizing the expanded chronic care model [Special issue]. Healthc Q. 2009; doi:10.​12927/​hcq.​2009.​21106.
34.
go back to reference Hébert RR, Veil AA. Monitoring the degree of implementation of an integrated delivery system. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:5–12.CrossRef Hébert RR, Veil AA. Monitoring the degree of implementation of an integrated delivery system. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:5–12.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Newhouse RP, Mills ME, Johantgen M, Pronovost PJ. Is there a relationship between service integration and differentiation and patient outcomes? Int J Integr Care. 2003;3:15–28. Newhouse RP, Mills ME, Johantgen M, Pronovost PJ. Is there a relationship between service integration and differentiation and patient outcomes? Int J Integr Care. 2003;3:15–28.
36.
go back to reference Anderson DA, Gillies RR, Mitchell JB, Morgan KL, Shortell SM. Conceptualizing and measuring integration: findings from the health systems integration study. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1993;38:467–89.PubMed Anderson DA, Gillies RR, Mitchell JB, Morgan KL, Shortell SM. Conceptualizing and measuring integration: findings from the health systems integration study. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1993;38:467–89.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Burns L, Walston SL, Alexander JA, Zuckerman HS, Andersen RM, Torrens PR. Just how integrated are integrated delivery systems? Results from a national survey. Health Care Manage R. 2001;26:20–39.CrossRef Burns L, Walston SL, Alexander JA, Zuckerman HS, Andersen RM, Torrens PR. Just how integrated are integrated delivery systems? Results from a national survey. Health Care Manage R. 2001;26:20–39.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cocozza JJ, Steadman HK, Dennis DL, Blasinsky M, Randolph FL, Johnsen M, et al. Successful systems integration strategies: the ACCESS program for persons who are homeless and mentally ill. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2000; doi:10.1023/A:1021390225515. Cocozza JJ, Steadman HK, Dennis DL, Blasinsky M, Randolph FL, Johnsen M, et al. Successful systems integration strategies: the ACCESS program for persons who are homeless and mentally ill. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2000; doi:10.​1023/​A:​1021390225515.
41.
go back to reference Ahgren B, Axelsson R. Evaluating integrated health care: a model for measurement. Int J Integr Care. 2005;5:1–9.CrossRef Ahgren B, Axelsson R. Evaluating integrated health care: a model for measurement. Int J Integr Care. 2005;5:1–9.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Browne G, Roberts J, Garni A, Byrne C, Kertyzia J, Loney P. Conceptualizing and validating the human services integration measure. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:3–12.CrossRef Browne G, Roberts J, Garni A, Byrne C, Kertyzia J, Loney P. Conceptualizing and validating the human services integration measure. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:3–12.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Indicators and measurement tools for health system integration: a knowledge synthesis protocol
Authors
Nelly D. Oelke
Esther Suter
Maria Alice Dias da Silva Lima
Cheryl Van Vliet-Brown
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0090-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Systematic Reviews 1/2015 Go to the issue