Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Symposium: Current Concepts in Cervical Spine Surgery

Increased In-hospital Complications After Primary Posterior versus Primary Anterior Cervical Fusion

Authors: Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD, Alexander Hughes, MD, Yan Ma, PhD, Ya Lin Chiu, MS, Andrew A. Sama, MD, Federico P. Girardi, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although anterior (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCDF) are relatively common procedures and both are associated with certain complications, the relative frequency and severity of these complications is unclear. Since for some patients either approach might be reasonable it is important to know the relative perioperative risks for decision-making.

Questions/purposes

The purposes of this study were to: (1) characterize the patient population undergoing ACDF and PCDF; (2) compare perioperative complication rates; (3) determine independent risk factors for adverse perioperative events; and (4) aid in surgical decision-making in cases in which clinical equipoise exists between anterior and posterior cervical fusion procedures.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample was used and entries for ACDF and PCDF between 1998 and 2006 were analyzed. Demographics and complication rates were determined and regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality after ACDF and PCDF.

Results

ACDF had a shorter length of stay and their procedures were more frequently performed at nonteaching institutions. The incidence of complications and mortality was 4.14% and 0.26% among patients undergoing ACDF and 15.35% and 1.44% for patients undergoing PCDF, respectively. When controlling for overall comorbidity burden and other demographic variables, PCDF was associated with a twofold increased risk of a fatal outcome compared with ACDF. Pulmonary, circulatory, and renal disease were associated with the highest odds for in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions

PCDF procedures were associated with higher perioperative rates of complications and mortality compared with ACDF surgeries. Despite limitations, these data should be considered in cases in which clinical equipoise exists between both approaches.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
Angevine PD, Arons RR, McCormick PC. National and regional rates and variation of cervical discectomy with and without anterior fusion, 1990–1999. Spine. 2003;28:931–939.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Bapat MB, Chaudhary K, Sharma A, Laheri V. Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1651–1663.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Browne JA, Cook C, Pietrobon R, Bethel MA, Richardson WJ. Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:2214–2219.
4.
Cabraja M, Abbushi A, Koeppan D, Kroppenstedt S, Woiciechowsky C. Comparison between anterior and posterior decompression with instrumentation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: sagittal alignment and clinical outcome. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E15.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Chang SW, Kakarla UK, Maughan PH, DeSanto J, Fox D, Theodore N, Dickman CA, Papadopoulos S, Sonntag VK. Four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: radiographic and clinical results. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:639–646; discussion 646–647.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Cooper PR, Cohen A, Rosiello A, Koslow M. Posterior stabilization of cervical spine fractures and subluxations using plate and screws. Neurosurgery. 1988;23:300–306.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Davis H. Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979–80. Spine. 1994;19:1117–1123.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Deen HG, Nottmeier EW, Reimer R. Early complications of posterior rod-screw fixation of the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:1062–1067; discussion 1067–1068.PubMed
10.
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Ghogawala Z, Comans JV, Benzel EC, Stabile LM, Barker FG 2nd. Ventral versus dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgeons’ assessment of eligibility for randomization in a proposed randomized controlled trial: results of a survey of the Cervical Spine Research Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:429–436.
12.
Gok B, McLoughlin GS, Sciubba DM, Sciubba DM, McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Wolinsky JP, Bydon A, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF. Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminectomy and instrumented fusion. Neurol Res. 2009;31:1097–1101.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
15.
Huang RC, Girardi FP, Poynton AR, Cammisa FP Jr. Treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy with posterior decompression and fusion with lateral mass plate fixation and local bone graft. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:123–129.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Kalanithi PS, Patil CG, Boakye M. National complication rates and disposition after posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1963–1969.
18.
Lee SH, Oh KJ, Yoon KS, Lee ST, Pandher DS. Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in elderly patients with wedge shaped tricortical autologous graft: a consecutive prospective series. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42:460–465.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G, Saunders WB. Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009;10:539–544.CrossRef
20.
Marawar S, Girardi FP, Sama AA, Ma Y, Gaber-Baylis LK, Besculides MC, Memtsoudis SG. National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 5 [Epub ahead of print].
21.
Memtsoudis SG, Ma Y, González Della Valle A, Mazumdar M, Gaber-Baylis LK, MacKenzie CR, Sculco TP. Perioperative outcomes after unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:1206–1216.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Monegal A, Navasa M, Guanabens N, Peris P, Pons F, Martinez de Osaba MJ, Rimola A, Rodes J, Munoz-Gomez J. Osteoporosis and bone mineral metabolism disorders in cirrhotic patients referred for orthotopic liver transplantation. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;60:148–154.CrossRefPubMed
23.
O’Brien JR, Dmitriev AE, Yu W, Gelb D, Ludwig S. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:340–346.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Papadopoulos EC, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Synnott K, Cammisa FP Jr. Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: radiographic and clinical results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:897–902.
25.
Patil PG, Turner DA, Pietrobon R. National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990–2000. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:753–758.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Pull ter Gunne AF, Cohen DB. Incidence, prevalence and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1422–1428.
28.
Sekhon LH. Posterior cervical decompression and fusion for circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis: review of 50 consecutive cases. J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13:23–30.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Shamji MF, Cook C, Tackett S, Brown C, Isaacs RE. Impact of preoperative neurological status on perioperative morbidity associated with anterior and posterior cervical fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine. 2008;9:10–16.CrossRef
30.
Veeravagu A, Patil CG, Lad SP, Boakye M. Risk factors for postoperative spinal wound infections after spinal decompression and fusion surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1869–1872.
31.
Wang MC, Chan L, Maiman DJ, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States. Spine. 2007;32:342–347. CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Increased In-hospital Complications After Primary Posterior versus Primary Anterior Cervical Fusion
Authors
Stavros G. Memtsoudis, MD, PhD
Alexander Hughes, MD
Yan Ma, PhD
Ya Lin Chiu, MS
Andrew A. Sama, MD
Federico P. Girardi, MD
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1549-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2011 Go to the issue

Symposium: Nonaccidental Trauma in Children

The Classic: Multiple Fractures in the Long Bones of Infants Suffering From Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor: The Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-analysis

Symposium: Current Concepts in Cervical Spine Surgery

Patients With Cervical Metastasis and Neoplastic Pachymeningitis are Less Likely to Improve Neurologically After Surgery

Symposium: Current Concepts in Cervical Spine Surgery

Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Current Treatment Options

Symposium: Current Concepts in Cervical Spine Surgery

Biographical Sketch: George L. Walton, MD and Walter E. Paul, MD

Clinical Research

Comparison of Femoral Morphology and Bone Mineral Density between Femoral Neck Fractures and Trochanteric Fractures