Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Original Article

Increased and unjustified CT usage in paediatric C-spine clearance in a level 2 trauma centre

Authors: Joost G. ten Brinke, Geertruida Slinger, Annelie Slaar, Teun Peter Saltzherr, Mike Hogervorst, J. Carel Goslings

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Cervical spine injury after blunt trauma in children is rare but can have severe consequences. Clear protocols for diagnostic workup are, therefore, needed, but currently not available. As a step in developing such a protocol, we determined the incidence of cervical spine injury and the degree of protocol adherence at our level 2 trauma centre.

Methods

We analysed data from all patients aged < 16 years suspected of cervical spine injury after blunt trauma who had presented to our hospital during two periods: January 2010 to June 2012, and January 2017 to June 2019. In the intervening period, the imaging protocol for diagnostic workup was updated. Outcomes were the incidence of cervical spine injury and protocol adherence in terms of the indication for imaging and the type of imaging.

Results

We included 170 children in the first study period and 83 in the second. One patient was diagnosed with cervical spine injury. Protocol adherence regarding the indication for imaging was > 80% in both periods. Adherence regarding the imaging type decreased over time, with 45.8% of the patients receiving a primary CT scan in the second study period versus 2.9% in the first.

Conclusion

Radiographic imaging is frequently performed when clearing the paediatric cervical spine, although cervical spine injury is rare. Particularly CT scan usage has wrongly been emerging over time. Stricter adherence to current protocols could limit overuse of radiographic imaging, but ultimately there is a need for an accurate rule predicting which children really are at risk of injury.
Literature
1.
Booth TN. Cervical spine evaluation in pediatric trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(5):W417–W425425.CrossRef
2.
Ribeiro da Silva M, Linhares D, Cacho Rodrigues P, Monteiro EL, Santos Carvalho M, Negrão P, et al. Paediatric cervical spine injures. Nineteen years experience of a single centre. Int Orthop. 2016;40(6):1111–6.CrossRef
3.
Copley PC, Tilliridou V, Kirby A, Jones J, Kandasamy J. Management of cervical spine trauma in children. Eur J Trauma EmergSurg. 2019;45(5):777–89.CrossRef
4.
Slaar A, Fockens MM, van Rijn RR, Maas M, Goslings JC, Bakx R, et al. Adherence to the guidelines of paediatric cervical spine clearance in a level I trauma centre: a single centre experience. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(1):55–60.CrossRef
5.
Platzer P, Jaindl M, Thalhammer G, Dittrich S, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Vecsei V, et al. Cervical spine injuries in pediatric patients. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2007;62(2):389–96.CrossRef
6.
Patel JC, Tepas JJ, Mollitt DL, Pieper P. Pediatric cervical spine injuries: defining the disease. J PediatrSurg. 2001;36(2):373–6.
7.
Viccellio P, Simon H, Pressman BD, Shah MN, Mower WR, Hoffman JR, et al. A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):E20.CrossRef
8.
Schöneberg C, Schweiger B, Hussmann B, Kauther MD, Lendemans S, Waydhas C. Diagnosis of cervical spine injuries in children: a systematic review. Eur J Trauma EmergSurg. 2013;39(6):653–65.CrossRef
9.
Baumann F, Ernstberger T, Neumann C, Nerlich M, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR, et al. Pediatric cervical spine injuries. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(7):E377–E384384.CrossRef
10.
Schöneberg C, Schweiger B, Lendemans S, Waydhas C. Special considerations in the interpretation of plain radiographs of the cervical spine in children. A review of the literature. Eur J Trauma EmergSurg. 2013;39(6):647–52.CrossRef
11.
Chung S, Mikrogianakis A, Wales PW, Dirks P, Shroff M, Singhal A, et al. Trauma association of Canada pediatric subcommittee national pediatric cervical spine evaluation pathway: consensus guidelines. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2011;70(4):873–84.CrossRef
12.
Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K, Mower WR. Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the national emergency x-radiography utilization study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32(4):461–9.CrossRef
13.
Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1841–8.CrossRef
14.
15.
Davis T, Ings A. Head injury: triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in children, young people and adults (NICE guideline CG 176). Arch Dis Child-EducPract Ed. 2015;100(2):97–100.CrossRef
16.
Rozzelle CJ, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Hurlbert RJ, Ryken TC, et al. Management of pediatric cervical spine and spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(suppl_3):205–26.CrossRef
17.
Mower WR, Hoffman JR, Pollack CV, Zucker MI, Browne BJ, Wolfson AB. Use of plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(1):1–7.CrossRef
18.
Nigrovic LE, Rogers AJ, Adelgais KM, Olsen CS, Leonard JR, Jaffe DM, et al. Utility of plain radiographs in detecting traumatic injuries of the cervical spine in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28(5):426–32.CrossRef
19.
Cui LW, Probst MA, Hoffman JR, Mower WR. Sensitivity of plain radiography for pediatric cervical spine injury. EmergRadiol. 2016;23(5):443–8.
20.
Frank JB, Lim CK, Flynn JM, Dormans JP. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cervical spine clearance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(11):1176–9.CrossRef
21.
22.
Gargas J, Yaszay B, Kruk P, Bastrom T, Shellington D, Khanna S. An analysis of cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging findings after normal computed tomographic imaging findings in pediatric trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(4):1102–7.CrossRef
23.
Herman MJ, Brown KO, Sponseller PD, Phillips JH, Petrucelli PM, Parikh DJ, et al. Pediatric cervical spine clearance. J Bone JtSurg. 2019;101(1):e1.CrossRef
24.
Pennell C, Gupta J, March M, Arthur LG, Lindholm E, Herman M, et al. A standardized protocol for cervical spine evaluation in children reduces imaging utilization: a pilot study of the pediatric cervical spine clearance working group protocol. J PediatrOrthop. 2020;40(8):e780–e784784.
25.
Jimenez RR, DeGuzman MA, Shiran S, Karrellas A, Lorenzo RL. CT versus plain radiographs for evaluation of c-spine injury in young children: do benefits outweigh risks? PediatrRadiol. 2008;38(6):635–44.
26.
Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMAPediatr. 2013;167(8):700.
27.
Grol R, Wensing M. Implementatie: effectieveverbetering van de patiëntenzorg. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Reed Business; 2011.
28.
Hopper SM, McKenna S, Williams A, Phillips N, Babl FE. Clinical clearance and imaging for possible cervical spine injury in children in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study. Emerg Med Australas. 2020;32(1):93–9.CrossRef
29.
30.
ten Brinke JG, Saltzherr TP, Panneman MJM, Hogervorst M, Goslings JC. Incidence of spinal fractures in the Netherlands 1997–2012. J ClinOrthop Trauma. 2017;8:S67–70.
31.
Bellolio F, Heien H, Sangaralingham L, Jeffery M, Campbell R, Cabrera D, et al. Increased computed tomography utilization in the emergency department and its association with hospital admission. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(5):835–45.CrossRef
32.
Broder J, Fordham LA, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000–2006. EmergRadiol. 2007;14(4):227–32.
33.
Lodwick DL, Cooper JN, Kelleher KJ, Brilli R, Minneci PC, Deans KJ. Variation in utilization of computed tomography imaging at tertiary pediatric hospitals. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):e1212–e12191219.CrossRef
34.
Smith-Bindman R, Kwan ML, Marlow EC, Theis MK, Bolch W, Cheng SY, et al. Trends in use of medical imaging in US health care systems and in ontario, canada, 2000–2016. JAMA. 2019;322(9):843.CrossRef
35.
36.
Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231(2):393–8.CrossRef
37.
Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S, Moineddin R, Charkot E, BenDavid G, et al. Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. PediatrRadiol. 2006;36(8):823–32.
38.
Merzenich H, Krille L, Hammer G, Kaiser M, Yamashita S, Zeeb H. Paediatric CT scan usage and referrals of children to computed tomography in Germany-a cross-sectional survey of medical practice and awareness of radiation related health risks among physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):47.CrossRef
39.
Brown N, Jones L. Knowledge of medical imaging radiation dose and risk among doctors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013;57(1):8–14.CrossRef
40.
Barnawi R, Alrefai W, Qari F, Aljefri A, Hagi S, Khafaji M. Doctors’ knowledge of the doses and risks of radiological investigations performed in the emergency department. Saudi Med J. 2018;39(11):1130–8.CrossRef
41.
Hale AT, Alvarado A, Bey AK, Pruthi S, Mencio GA, Bonfield CM, et al. X-ray vs. CT in identifying significant C-spine injuries in the pediatric population. Child’s NervSyst. 2017;33(11):1977–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Increased and unjustified CT usage in paediatric C-spine clearance in a level 2 trauma centre
Authors
Joost G. ten Brinke
Geertruida Slinger
Annelie Slaar
Teun Peter Saltzherr
Mike Hogervorst
J. Carel Goslings
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01520-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2021 Go to the issue

Correction

Correction to: Increased and unjustified CT usage in paediatric C‑spine clearance in a level 2 trauma centre

Letter to the Editor

We still do not know which patients with a(n) (almost) simple elbow dislocation need an operative treatment

Original Article

Epidemiology of trauma presentations to a major trauma centre in the North West of England during the COVID-19 level 4 lockdown

Original Article

Identifying risk factors of cerebrovascular injuries following blunt mandible fracture; a retrospective study from a national data base

Original Article

The ICON Trauma Study: the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on major trauma workload in the UK

Original Article

Hemi-hamate osteochondral autograft for acute dorsal proximal interphalangeal fracture-dislocations