Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 10/2010

01-10-2010 | Original paper

Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Authors: Stephanie M. Smith, Jennifer S. Ford, William Rakowski, Chaya S. Moskowitz, Lisa Diller, Melissa M. Hudson, Ann C. Mertens, Annette L. Stanton, Tara O. Henderson, Wendy M. Leisenring, Leslie L. Robison, Kevin C. Oeffinger

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 10/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Women treated with chest radiation for a pediatric cancer have low mammography screening rates despite their high risk for breast cancer. This study characterized the relationship between perceptions of mammography and screening practices. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 523 women in North America who were treated with chest radiation before 21 years of age. Women with inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices were identified using the Pros and Cons of Mammography for perceptions and Transtheoretical Model stages of adoption for prior and intended screening practices. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify barriers to and facilitators of screening among women with positive and negative perceptions. Nearly one-third of the cohort had inconsistent perceptions and practices: 37.4% had positive perceptions and were not having mammograms; 27.6% had negative/neutral perceptions and were having mammograms. Regardless of perceptions, a recent physician’s recommendation for mammography, age ≥ 40, and interest in routine health care were universally associated with mammography practices. For women with positive perceptions and a physician’s recommendation, barriers to screening included high acceptance coping, low active-planning coping, and high internal health locus of control. For women with negative perceptions, acknowledging the importance of asymptomatic screening was associated with mammography.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhatia S, Yasui Y, Robison LL et al (2003) High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin’s disease: report from the late effects study group. J Clin Oncol 21(23):4386–4394CrossRefPubMed Bhatia S, Yasui Y, Robison LL et al (2003) High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin’s disease: report from the late effects study group. J Clin Oncol 21(23):4386–4394CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Constine LS, Tarbell N, Hudson MM et al (2008) Subsequent malignancies in children treated for Hodgkin’s disease: associations with gender and radiation dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(1):24–33PubMed Constine LS, Tarbell N, Hudson MM et al (2008) Subsequent malignancies in children treated for Hodgkin’s disease: associations with gender and radiation dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(1):24–33PubMed
3.
go back to reference Guibout C, Adjadj E, Rubino C et al (2005) Malignant breast tumors after radiotherapy for a first cancer during childhood. J Clin Oncol 23(1):197–204CrossRefPubMed Guibout C, Adjadj E, Rubino C et al (2005) Malignant breast tumors after radiotherapy for a first cancer during childhood. J Clin Oncol 23(1):197–204CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kenney LB, Yasui Y, Inskip PD et al (2004) Breast cancer after childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Ann Intern Med 141(8):590–597PubMed Kenney LB, Yasui Y, Inskip PD et al (2004) Breast cancer after childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Ann Intern Med 141(8):590–597PubMed
5.
go back to reference Metayer C, Lynch CF, Clarke EA et al (2000) Second cancers among long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease diagnosed in childhood and adolescence. J Clin Oncol 18(12):2435–2443PubMed Metayer C, Lynch CF, Clarke EA et al (2000) Second cancers among long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease diagnosed in childhood and adolescence. J Clin Oncol 18(12):2435–2443PubMed
6.
go back to reference Taylor AJ, Winter DL, Stiller CA, Murphy M, Hawkins MM (2007) Risk of breast cancer in female survivors of childhood Hodgkin’s disease in Britain: a population-based study. Inter J Cancer 120(2):384–391CrossRef Taylor AJ, Winter DL, Stiller CA, Murphy M, Hawkins MM (2007) Risk of breast cancer in female survivors of childhood Hodgkin’s disease in Britain: a population-based study. Inter J Cancer 120(2):384–391CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wolden SL, Lamborn KR, Cleary SF, Tate DJ, Donaldson SS (1998) Second cancers following pediatric Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 16(2):536–544PubMed Wolden SL, Lamborn KR, Cleary SF, Tate DJ, Donaldson SS (1998) Second cancers following pediatric Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 16(2):536–544PubMed
8.
go back to reference Landier W, Bhatia S, Eshelman DA et al (2004) Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the Children’s Oncology Group long-term follow-up guidelines from the Children’s Oncology Group late effects committee and nursing discipline. J Clin Oncol 22(24):4979–4990CrossRefPubMed Landier W, Bhatia S, Eshelman DA et al (2004) Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the Children’s Oncology Group long-term follow-up guidelines from the Children’s Oncology Group late effects committee and nursing discipline. J Clin Oncol 22(24):4979–4990CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers (2007) Children’s Oncology Group. [Online]. Updated October 2008 [cited 2009 April 17]; Available from: www.survivorshipguidelines.org Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers (2007) Children’s Oncology Group. [Online]. Updated October 2008 [cited 2009 April 17]; Available from: www.​survivorshipguid​elines.​org
10.
go back to reference Oeffinger KC, Ford JS, Moskowitz CS et al (2009) Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer. JAMA 301(4):404–414CrossRefPubMed Oeffinger KC, Ford JS, Moskowitz CS et al (2009) Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer. JAMA 301(4):404–414CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sohl SJ, Moyer A (2007) Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 45(4):252–261CrossRefPubMed Sohl SJ, Moyer A (2007) Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 45(4):252–261CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Spencer L, Pagell F, Adams T (2005) Applying the transtheoretical model to cancer screening behavior. Am J Health Behav 29(1):36–56PubMed Spencer L, Pagell F, Adams T (2005) Applying the transtheoretical model to cancer screening behavior. Am J Health Behav 29(1):36–56PubMed
13.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Andersen MR, Stoddard AM et al (1997) Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychol 16(5):433–441CrossRefPubMed Rakowski W, Andersen MR, Stoddard AM et al (1997) Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychol 16(5):433–441CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Dube CA, Goldstein MG (1996) Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography. Health Educ Res 11(1):77–96CrossRef Rakowski W, Dube CA, Goldstein MG (1996) Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography. Health Educ Res 11(1):77–96CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP (1993) Women’s decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol 12(3):209–214CrossRefPubMed Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP (1993) Women’s decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol 12(3):209–214CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B et al (1998) Stages of adopting regular screening mammography: do women differ in decisional balance within stages? J Health Psychol 3(4):491–506CrossRef Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B et al (1998) Stages of adopting regular screening mammography: do women differ in decisional balance within stages? J Health Psychol 3(4):491–506CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Velicer WF, Hughes SL, Fava JL, Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (1995) An empirical typology of subjects within stage of change. Addict Behav 20(3):299–320CrossRefPubMed Velicer WF, Hughes SL, Fava JL, Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (1995) An empirical typology of subjects within stage of change. Addict Behav 20(3):299–320CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W (2003) Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med 26(3):172–181CrossRefPubMed Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W (2003) Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med 26(3):172–181CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Pacific Grove Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Pacific Grove
20.
go back to reference Cook EF, Goldman L (1984) Empiric comparison of multivariate analytic techniques: advantages and disadvantages of recursive partitioning analysis. J Chron Dis 37(9/10):721–731CrossRefPubMed Cook EF, Goldman L (1984) Empiric comparison of multivariate analytic techniques: advantages and disadvantages of recursive partitioning analysis. J Chron Dis 37(9/10):721–731CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Calvocoressi L, Kasl SV, Lee CH, Stolar M, Claus EB, Jones BA (2004) A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40–79 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(12):2096–2105PubMed Calvocoressi L, Kasl SV, Lee CH, Stolar M, Claus EB, Jones BA (2004) A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40–79 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(12):2096–2105PubMed
22.
go back to reference Robison LL, Mertens AC, Boice JD et al (2002) Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project. Med Pediatr Oncol 38(4):229–239CrossRefPubMed Robison LL, Mertens AC, Boice JD et al (2002) Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project. Med Pediatr Oncol 38(4):229–239CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Leisenring WM, Mertens AC, Armstrong GT et al (2009) Pediatric cancer survivorship research: experience of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 27(14):2319–2327CrossRefPubMed Leisenring WM, Mertens AC, Armstrong GT et al (2009) Pediatric cancer survivorship research: experience of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 27(14):2319–2327CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Boice JD et al (2009) The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a National Cancer Institute-supported resource for outcome and intervention research. J Clin Oncol 27(14):2308–2318CrossRefPubMed Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Boice JD et al (2009) The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a National Cancer Institute-supported resource for outcome and intervention research. J Clin Oncol 27(14):2308–2318CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Clark MA, Pearlman DN et al. (1997) Integrating pros and cons for mammography and Pap testing: extending the construct of decisional balance to two behaviors. Prev Med 26(5 Pt 1):664–673 Rakowski W, Clark MA, Pearlman DN et al. (1997) Integrating pros and cons for mammography and Pap testing: extending the construct of decisional balance to two behaviors. Prev Med 26(5 Pt 1):664–673
26.
go back to reference Rakowski W, Dube CA, Marcus BH, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Abrams DB (1992) Assessing elements of women’s decisions about mammography. Health Psychol 11(2):111–118CrossRefPubMed Rakowski W, Dube CA, Marcus BH, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Abrams DB (1992) Assessing elements of women’s decisions about mammography. Health Psychol 11(2):111–118CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 56(2):267–283CrossRefPubMed Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 56(2):267–283CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pui CH, Pei D, Sandlund JT et al (2005) Risk of adverse events after completion of therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 23(31):7936–7941CrossRefPubMed Pui CH, Pei D, Sandlund JT et al (2005) Risk of adverse events after completion of therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 23(31):7936–7941CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Baker KS, Ness KK, Steinberger J et al (2007) Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular events in survivors of hematopoietic cell transplantation: a report from the bone marrow transplantation survivor study. Blood 109(4):1765–1772CrossRefPubMed Baker KS, Ness KK, Steinberger J et al (2007) Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular events in survivors of hematopoietic cell transplantation: a report from the bone marrow transplantation survivor study. Blood 109(4):1765–1772CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wallston KA (2005) The validity of the multidimensional health locus of control scales. J Health Psychol 10(5):623–631CrossRefPubMed Wallston KA (2005) The validity of the multidimensional health locus of control scales. J Health Psychol 10(5):623–631CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Steinberg D, Colla P (1997) CART—classification and regression trees. Salford Systems, San Diego Steinberg D, Colla P (1997) CART—classification and regression trees. Salford Systems, San Diego
32.
go back to reference Steinberg D, Golovnya M (2006) CART 6.0 user’s manual. Salford Systems, San Diego Steinberg D, Golovnya M (2006) CART 6.0 user’s manual. Salford Systems, San Diego
33.
go back to reference Breiman L (1996) Technical note: some properties of splitting criteria. Machine Learning 24:41–47 Breiman L (1996) Technical note: some properties of splitting criteria. Machine Learning 24:41–47
34.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies. Springer, New York Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies. Springer, New York
35.
go back to reference Rimer BK, Keintz MK, Kessler HB, Engstrom PF, Rosan JR (1989) Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology 172(1):243–246PubMed Rimer BK, Keintz MK, Kessler HB, Engstrom PF, Rosan JR (1989) Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology 172(1):243–246PubMed
36.
go back to reference Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS (1999) Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8(9):749–757PubMed Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS (1999) Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8(9):749–757PubMed
37.
go back to reference Glenn BL, Moore LA (1990) Relationship of self-concept, health locus of control, and perceived cancer treatment options to the practice of breast self-examination. Cancer Nurs 13(6):361–365CrossRefPubMed Glenn BL, Moore LA (1990) Relationship of self-concept, health locus of control, and perceived cancer treatment options to the practice of breast self-examination. Cancer Nurs 13(6):361–365CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Holm CJ, Frank DI, Curtin J (1999) Health beliefs, health locus of control, and women’s mammography behavior. Cancer Nurs 22(2):149–156CrossRefPubMed Holm CJ, Frank DI, Curtin J (1999) Health beliefs, health locus of control, and women’s mammography behavior. Cancer Nurs 22(2):149–156CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Magai C, Consedine N, Neugut AI, Hershman DL (2007) Common psychosocial factors underlying breast cancer screening and breast cancer treatment adherence: a conceptual review and synthesis. J Womens Health 16(1):11–23CrossRef Magai C, Consedine N, Neugut AI, Hershman DL (2007) Common psychosocial factors underlying breast cancer screening and breast cancer treatment adherence: a conceptual review and synthesis. J Womens Health 16(1):11–23CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Murray M, McMillan C (1993) Health beliefs, locus of control, emotional control and women’s cancer screening behaviour. Br J Clin Psychol 32(Pt 1):87–100PubMed Murray M, McMillan C (1993) Health beliefs, locus of control, emotional control and women’s cancer screening behaviour. Br J Clin Psychol 32(Pt 1):87–100PubMed
41.
go back to reference Masters K, Wallston K (2005) Canonical correlation reveals important relations between health locus of control, coping, affect and values. J Health Psychol 10(5):719–731CrossRefPubMed Masters K, Wallston K (2005) Canonical correlation reveals important relations between health locus of control, coping, affect and values. J Health Psychol 10(5):719–731CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Wallston K (1991) The importance of placing measures of health locus of control beliefs in a theoretical context. Health Educ Res 6(2):251–252CrossRef Wallston K (1991) The importance of placing measures of health locus of control beliefs in a theoretical context. Health Educ Res 6(2):251–252CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Wallston K (1992) Hocus-pocus, the focus isn’t strictly on locus: Rotter’s Social Learning Theory modified for health. Cognit Ther Res 16(2):183–199CrossRef Wallston K (1992) Hocus-pocus, the focus isn’t strictly on locus: Rotter’s Social Learning Theory modified for health. Cognit Ther Res 16(2):183–199CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Di Gallo A, Amsler F, Gwerder C, Burgin D (2003) The years after: a concept of the psychological integration of childhood cancer. Support Care Cancer 11(10):666–673CrossRefPubMed Di Gallo A, Amsler F, Gwerder C, Burgin D (2003) The years after: a concept of the psychological integration of childhood cancer. Support Care Cancer 11(10):666–673CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Greenberg HS, Kazak AE, Meadows AT (1989) Psychologic functioning in 8- to 16-year-old cancer survivors and their parents. J Pediatr 114(3):488–493CrossRefPubMed Greenberg HS, Kazak AE, Meadows AT (1989) Psychologic functioning in 8- to 16-year-old cancer survivors and their parents. J Pediatr 114(3):488–493CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Hill JM, Kornblith AB, Jones D et al (1998) A comparative study of the long term psychosocial functioning of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors treated by intrathecal methotrexate with or without cranial radiation. Cancer 82(1):208–218CrossRefPubMed Hill JM, Kornblith AB, Jones D et al (1998) A comparative study of the long term psychosocial functioning of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors treated by intrathecal methotrexate with or without cranial radiation. Cancer 82(1):208–218CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Olson AL, Boyle WE, Evans MW, Zug LA (1993) Overall function in rural childhood cancer survivors. The role of social competence and emotional health. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 32(6):334–342 Olson AL, Boyle WE, Evans MW, Zug LA (1993) Overall function in rural childhood cancer survivors. The role of social competence and emotional health. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 32(6):334–342
48.
go back to reference Jamison R, Lewis S, Burish T (1986) Psychological impact of cancer on adolescents: self-image, locus of control, perception of illness and knowledge of cancer. J Chron Dis 39(8):609–617CrossRefPubMed Jamison R, Lewis S, Burish T (1986) Psychological impact of cancer on adolescents: self-image, locus of control, perception of illness and knowledge of cancer. J Chron Dis 39(8):609–617CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Schwartz MD, Taylor KL, Willard KS, Siegel JE, Lamdan RM, Moran K (1999) Distress, personality, and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer. Health Psychol 18(4):327–332CrossRefPubMed Schwartz MD, Taylor KL, Willard KS, Siegel JE, Lamdan RM, Moran K (1999) Distress, personality, and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer. Health Psychol 18(4):327–332CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Schwartz MD, Taylor KL, Willard KS (2003) Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer. J Behav Med 26(2):105–117CrossRefPubMed Schwartz MD, Taylor KL, Willard KS (2003) Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer. J Behav Med 26(2):105–117CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Williams-Piehota P, Schneider TR, Pizarro J, Mowad L, Salovey P (2004) Matching health messages to health locus of control beliefs for promoting mammography utilization. Psychol Health 19(4):407–423CrossRef Williams-Piehota P, Schneider TR, Pizarro J, Mowad L, Salovey P (2004) Matching health messages to health locus of control beliefs for promoting mammography utilization. Psychol Health 19(4):407–423CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Castellino SM, Casillas J, Hudson MM et al (2005) Minority adult survivors of childhood cancer: a comparison of long-term outcomes, health care utilization and health related behaviors. J Clin Oncol 23(27):6499–6507CrossRefPubMed Castellino SM, Casillas J, Hudson MM et al (2005) Minority adult survivors of childhood cancer: a comparison of long-term outcomes, health care utilization and health related behaviors. J Clin Oncol 23(27):6499–6507CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
Authors
Stephanie M. Smith
Jennifer S. Ford
William Rakowski
Chaya S. Moskowitz
Lisa Diller
Melissa M. Hudson
Ann C. Mertens
Annette L. Stanton
Tara O. Henderson
Wendy M. Leisenring
Leslie L. Robison
Kevin C. Oeffinger
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 10/2010
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9587-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2010

Cancer Causes & Control 10/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine