Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Inclusion of progression criteria in external randomised pilot trials: a cross-sectional study of funding applications submitted to the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Programme

Authors: Katie Mellor, James Harwood, Jennie Hejdenberg, Ben Morgan, Susan J. Dutton, Sally Hopewell

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

External randomised pilot trials aim to assess whether a future definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) is feasible. Pre-specified progression criteria help guide the interpretation of pilot trial findings to decide whether, and how, a definitive trial should be conducted. We aimed to examine how researchers report and plan to assess progression criteria in external pilot trial funding applications submitted to the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Programme.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of progression criteria inclusion in Stage 1 (outline) and corresponding Stage 2 (full) funding applications for external randomised external pilot trials submitted to NIHR RfPB between July 2017 and July 2019.

Results

Of the 100 Stage 1 outline applications assessed, 95 were eligible for inclusion (of these, 52 were invited to Stage 2 full application; 43 were rejected) and 49/52 were eligible for inclusion at Stage 2 full application (of these, 35 were awarded funding; 14 were rejected). Over half of applications assessed at Stage 1 (48/95, 51%), and 73% of those assessed at Stage 2 (36/49) included progression criteria in their research plans. Progression criteria were most often reported in a stop-go format, often with additional specified factors that should be considered when determining feasibility (Stage 1 33/48, 69%; Stage 2 21/36, 58%). Recruitment and retention were the most frequent indicators of feasibility to inform progression criteria. One-third of applications provided some justification or rationale for their targets (Stage 1 16/48, 33%; Stage 2 12/36, 33%). Funding committee feedback mentioned progression criteria in over 20% of applications (Stage 1 22/95, 23%; Stage 2 11/49, 22%) to either request the addition of progression criteria or provide justification for the criteria stipulated.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that researchers do not always include progression criteria in external randomised pilot trial applications submitted to research funders. This can result in a lack of transparency in the assessment of randomised pilot trial feasibility.

Trial registration

Open Science Framework osf.io/89ap7, registered 29th June 2021.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, et al. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. Lazzeri C, editor. PLoS One Public Library of Science; 2016;11:e0150205. Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, et al. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. Lazzeri C, editor. PLoS One Public Library of Science; 2016;11:e0150205. Available from: http://​dx.​plos.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0150205.
5.
go back to reference Rosala-Hallas A, Gamble C, Blazeby J, Williamson PR. A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials. Trials Trials. 2019;20:1–5. Rosala-Hallas A, Gamble C, Blazeby J, Williamson PR. A review of current practice in the design and assessment of internal pilots in UK NIHR clinical trials. Trials Trials. 2019;20:1–5.
6.
go back to reference Herbert E, Julious SA, Goodacre S. Progression criteria in trials with an internal pilot: an audit of publicly funded randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2019;20:1–9.CrossRef Herbert E, Julious SA, Goodacre S. Progression criteria in trials with an internal pilot: an audit of publicly funded randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2019;20:1–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, Francischetto EOC, Metcalfe C, Davidson P, et al. Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: Exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017:7. Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, Francischetto EOC, Metcalfe C, Davidson P, et al. Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: Exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017:7.
8.
go back to reference Mbuagbaw L, Kosa SD, Lawson DO, Stalteri R, Olaiya OR, Alotaibi A, et al. The reporting of progression criteria in protocols of pilot trials designed to assess the feasibility of main trials is insufficient: a meta-epidemiological study. Pilot feasibility Stud, vol. 5. England: Pilot and Feasibility Studies; 2019. p. 120. Mbuagbaw L, Kosa SD, Lawson DO, Stalteri R, Olaiya OR, Alotaibi A, et al. The reporting of progression criteria in protocols of pilot trials designed to assess the feasibility of main trials is insufficient: a meta-epidemiological study. Pilot feasibility Stud, vol. 5. England: Pilot and Feasibility Studies; 2019. p. 120.
9.
go back to reference Mellor K, Hejdenberg J, Morgan B, Hopewell S. Progression criteria in external randomised pilot trials: Protocol for a review of Research for Patient Benefit funding applications. OSF. 2021; [cited 2021 Jun 29]; Available from: https://osf.io/89ap7. Mellor K, Hejdenberg J, Morgan B, Hopewell S. Progression criteria in external randomised pilot trials: Protocol for a review of Research for Patient Benefit funding applications. OSF. 2021; [cited 2021 Jun 29]; Available from: https://​osf.​io/​89ap7.
13.
go back to reference Fairhurst K, Blazeby JM, Potter S, Gamble C, Rowlands C, Avery KNL. Value of surgical pilot and feasibility study protocols. Br J Surg. 2019;106:968–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fairhurst K, Blazeby JM, Potter S, Gamble C, Rowlands C, Avery KNL. Value of surgical pilot and feasibility study protocols. Br J Surg. 2019;106:968–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Inclusion of progression criteria in external randomised pilot trials: a cross-sectional study of funding applications submitted to the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Authors
Katie Mellor
James Harwood
Jennie Hejdenberg
Ben Morgan
Susan J. Dutton
Sally Hopewell
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06868-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue