Top

Hernia

Published in:

28-10-2023 | Incisional Hernia | Review Article

The top 100 most-cited papers in incisional hernia: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2023

Authors: Y. Xv, A. A. S. AL-Magedi, R. Wu, N. Cao, Q. Tao, Z. Ji

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2024

Abstract

Purpose

Incisional hernia (IH) is one of the most common complications after abdominal surgeries and may bring great suffering to patients. This study aims to evaluate the global trends in IH research from 2003 to 2023 and visualize the frontiers using bibliometric analysis.

Methods

The literature search was conducted on the Web of Science for IH studies published from 2003 to 2023 and sorted by citation frequency. The top 100 most-cited articles were analyzed by the annual publication number, prolific countries and institutions, influential author and journal, and the number of citations through descriptive statistics and visualization.

Results

The top paper was cited 1075 times and the median number of citations was 146. All studies were published between 2003 and 2019 and the most prolific year was 2003 with 14 articles. Jeekel J and Rosen M were regarded as the most productive authors with ten articles each and acquired 2738 and 2391 citations, respectively. The top three institutions with the most productive articles were Erasmus Mc, Carolinas Med Ctr, and Univ Utah, while the top three countries were the United States, Netherlands and Germany. The most frequent keyword was “incisional hernia” with 55 occurrences, followed by “mesh repair”, “randomized controlled trial”, and “polypropylene”.

Conclusion

The 100 most-cited papers related to IH were published predominantly by USA and European countries, with randomized controlled trial (RCT) and observational study designs, addressing topics related to risk factors, complications, mesh repair, and mesh components.

Available only for authorised users

Khor SN, Cheok SHX, Sultana R, Tan EKW (2023) Incidence of incisional hernia after major colorectal cancer surgery & analysis of associated risk factors in Asian population: Is laparoscopy any better? Asian J Surg 46:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.01.029CrossRefPubMed

Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T, Cornish J, Harries R, Stimpson A, Davies L, Glasbey JC, Frewer KA, Frewer NC, Russell D, Russell I, Torkington J (2015) Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS ONE 10:e0138745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138745CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Söderbäck H, Gunnarsson U, Hellman P, Sandblom G (2018) Incisional hernia after surgery for colorectal cancer: a population-based register study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1411–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3124-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Grove TN, Muirhead LJ, Parker SG, Brogden DRL, Mills SC, Kontovounisios C, Windsor ACJ, Warren OJ (2021) Measuring quality of life in patients with abdominal wall hernias: a systematic review of available tools. Hernia 25:491–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02210-wCrossRefPubMed

Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR (2017) Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:Cd005661. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2CrossRefPubMed

Köckerling F (2019) Recurrent incisional hernia repair—an overview. Front Surg 6:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00026CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ahmad P, Dummer PMH, Chaudhry A, Rashid U, Saif S, Asif JA (2019) A bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in endodontic journals. Int Endod J 52:1297–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13131CrossRefPubMed

Kulacoglu H (2019) Most cited 100 articles in herniology: bibliometric study. Int J Abdominal Wall Hernia Surg 2:96–104. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_18_19CrossRef

Belyansky I, Daes J, Radu VG, Balasubramanian R, Reza Zahiri H, Weltz AS, Sibia US, Park A, Novitsky Y (2018) A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair. Surg Endosc 32:1525–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5840-2CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, Berrevoet F, Bingener-Casey J, Chen D, Chen J, Chowbey P, Dietz UA, de Beaux A, Ferzli G, Fortelny R, Hoffmann H, Iskander M, Ji Z, Jorgensen LN, Khullar R, Kirchhoff P, Köckerling F, Kukleta J, LeBlanc K, Li J, Lomanto D, Mayer F, Meytes V, Misra M, Morales-Conde S, Niebuhr H, Radvinsky D, Ramshaw B, Ranev D, Reinpold W, Sharma A, Schrittwieser R, Stechemesser B, Sutedja B, Tang J, Warren J, Weyhe D, Wiegering A, Woeste G, Yao Q (2019) Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A. Surg Endosc 33:3069–3139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–399. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000086662.49499.abCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Cobb WS, Burns JM, Peindl RD, Carbonell AM, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2006) Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. J Surg Res 136:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.05.022CrossRefPubMed

14.

Colavita PD, Tsirline VB, Belyansky I, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2012) Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 256:714–722. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182734130CrossRefPubMed

15.

Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Pollinger HS, Backus CL, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. J Surg Res 114:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4804(03)00158-6CrossRefPubMed

16.

Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, Klinge U, Köckerling F, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales Conde S, Puppe F, Simmermacher RK, Śmietański M, Miserez M (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0912-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, López-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5CrossRefPubMed

18.

Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietański M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0518-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Eker HH, Hansson BM, Buunen M, Janssen IM, Pierik RE, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2013) Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 148:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1466CrossRefPubMed

20.

Olmi S, Scaini A, Cesana GC, Erba L, Croce E (2007) Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 21:555–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9229-5CrossRefPubMed

21.

Itani KM, Hur K, Kim LT, Anthony T, Berger DH, Reda D, Neumayer L (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 145:322–328. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.18CrossRefPubMed

22.

Misra MC, Bansal VK, Kulkarni MP, Pawar DK (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1839–1845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0118-0CrossRefPubMed

23.

de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, Rosman C, Hesselink EJ, van der Wilt GJ, Bleichrodt RP (2007) Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair : interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 31:756–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0502-xCrossRefPubMed

24.

Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, van der Palen J, Rakic S (2010) Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24:1296–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1CrossRefPubMed

25.

Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, Wijnhoven BP, Schouten WR, Cense HA, Stockmann HB, Berends FJ, Dijkhuizen FPH, Dwarkasing RS, Jairam AP, van Ramshorst GH, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:1254–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60459-7CrossRefPubMed

26.

Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144:1056–1059. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.189CrossRefPubMed

27.

Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik R, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Timman R, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon JA, Schuhmacher C, Mihaljevic A, Izbicki JR, Fikatas P, Knebel P, Fortelny RH, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Jeekel HJ (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390:567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31332-6CrossRefPubMed

28.

Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, Franck A, Kieser M, Büchler MW, Knaebel HP (2009) Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg 249:576–582. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8CrossRefPubMed

29.

Bevis PM, Windhaber RA, Lear PA, Poskitt KR, Earnshaw JJ, Mitchell DC (2010) Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 97:1497–1502. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7137CrossRefPubMed

30.

Yeung AWK (2019) Comparison between Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and publishers for mislabelled review papers. Curr Sci 116:1909–1914. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i11/1909-1914CrossRef

31.

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22:338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSFCrossRefPubMed

Title: The top 100 most-cited papers in incisional hernia: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2023
Authors: Y. Xv
A. A. S. AL-Magedi
R. Wu
N. Cao
Q. Tao
Z. Ji
Publication date: 28-10-2023
Publisher: Springer Paris
Keyword: Incisional Hernia
Published in: Hernia / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02909-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The top 100 most-cited papers in incisional hernia: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2023

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Correction to: Characterization of host response, resorption, and strength properties, and performance in the presence of bacteria for fully absorbable biomaterials for soft tissue repair

Do surgical drains reduce the postoperative surgical complications following incisional hernia repair? A systematic meta-analysis

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Temporal patterns for inguinal hernia recurrence operations after Shouldice Repair

Comment to: Adolescent inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature and recommendations for selective management

Evaluating the complications of adult groin hernia where there is no hernia registry: a systematic review of Nigerian literature