Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 2/2023

31-08-2022 | Incision | Review

Grading for suction loss in small incision lenticule extraction

Authors: Qing Huang, Lina Liu, Pingqi Ma, Yulin Sun, Zhiqiang Wang, Ji Bai, Ting Liu

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

To observe the characteristics of suction loss in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and analyze the factors affecting the stability of the suction ring, classify and grade suction loss, and determine the principles for its prevention and control.

Methods

This study enrolled patients who underwent SMILE between June 2014 and June 2017. The relationship between the stability of the suction ring and suction loss was ascertained using surgical records and video recordings. The suction loss was classified and graded according to its characteristics and relationship with eye or head movement. The effect of target intervention on suction loss was observed.

Results

Suction loss can be divided into sudden and progressive types. According to the severity, the latter was divided into three grades (grade 1A or 1B, 2 and 3). Of the 1200 eyes (608 patients), two (0.17%) had sudden suction loss, and 132 (11%) had progressive suction loss. The superior part, inferior part, and other parts accounted for 63.4%, 19.3%, and 17.3% of progressive suction loss, respectively. The proportion of grades 1A, 1B, 2, and 3 suction loss was 53%, 34%, 12%, and 1%, respectively. The location of the threatened suction loss was opposite to the direction of the patient's head movement. After the intraoperative intervention, grades 1 and 2 did not develop into "actual" suction loss.

Conclusions

Progressive suction loss was the most frequently observed suction loss during SMILE procedure. Grading suction loss can elucidate its underlying mechanism, which can guide targeted intervention measures to effectively control and reduce suction loss-induced damage, and further improve the safety and efficacy of SMILE.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hamed AM, Heikal MA, Soliman TT et al (2019) SMILE intraoperative complications: incidence and management. Int J Ophthalmol 12:280–283PubMedPubMedCentral Hamed AM, Heikal MA, Soliman TT et al (2019) SMILE intraoperative complications: incidence and management. Int J Ophthalmol 12:280–283PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Chen W, Chen JB, Xu MP (2020) The incidence and characteristics of suction loss in small incision lenticule extraction procedures. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 22:274–279 Chen W, Chen JB, Xu MP (2020) The incidence and characteristics of suction loss in small incision lenticule extraction procedures. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 22:274–279
3.
go back to reference Huang TZ, Shen L, Yu XN et al (2020) Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes. BMC Ophthalmol 20:412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang TZ, Shen L, Yu XN et al (2020) Risk factors and incidence of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in 8493 eyes. BMC Ophthalmol 20:412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI et al (2016) Quality control outcomes analysis of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia by a novice surgeon at the first refractive surgery unit in Nepal during the first 2 years of operation. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:267–274CrossRefPubMed Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI et al (2016) Quality control outcomes analysis of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia by a novice surgeon at the first refractive surgery unit in Nepal during the first 2 years of operation. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:267–274CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Osman IM, Awad R, Shi W et al (2016) Suction loss during femtosecond laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction: incidence and analysis of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:246–250CrossRefPubMed Osman IM, Awad R, Shi W et al (2016) Suction loss during femtosecond laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction: incidence and analysis of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:246–250CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Choi WY, Gold DR (2019) Ocular motor and vestibular disorders in brainstem disease. J Clin Neurophysiol 36:396–404CrossRefPubMed Choi WY, Gold DR (2019) Ocular motor and vestibular disorders in brainstem disease. J Clin Neurophysiol 36:396–404CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ramat S (2019) Understanding the rotational vestibular ocular reflex: from differential equations to Laplace transforms. Prog Brain Res 248:29–44CrossRefPubMed Ramat S (2019) Understanding the rotational vestibular ocular reflex: from differential equations to Laplace transforms. Prog Brain Res 248:29–44CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chinese Medical Association Ophthalmology Branch Ophthalmology and Optometry Group (2018) Expert consensus on SMILE in China. Chin J Ophthalmol 54:729–736 Chinese Medical Association Ophthalmology Branch Ophthalmology and Optometry Group (2018) Expert consensus on SMILE in China. Chin J Ophthalmol 54:729–736
9.
go back to reference Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS et al (2020) Suction stability management in small incision lenticule extraction: incidence and outcomes of suction loss in 4000 consecutive procedures. Acta Ophthalmol 98:72–80CrossRef Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS et al (2020) Suction stability management in small incision lenticule extraction: incidence and outcomes of suction loss in 4000 consecutive procedures. Acta Ophthalmol 98:72–80CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wan KH, Lin TPH, Lai KHW et al (2021) Options and results in managing suction loss during SMILE. J Cataract Refract Surg 47:933–941PubMed Wan KH, Lin TPH, Lai KHW et al (2021) Options and results in managing suction loss during SMILE. J Cataract Refract Surg 47:933–941PubMed
11.
go back to reference Chung B, Kang DSY, Kim JH et al (2020) Clinical outcomes of immediate transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy after suction loss during small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 46:756–761CrossRefPubMed Chung B, Kang DSY, Kim JH et al (2020) Clinical outcomes of immediate transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy after suction loss during small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 46:756–761CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ma JN, Wang Y, Zhang L et al (2018) Clinical study of suction loss in small incision lenticule extraction. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 54:890–896PubMed Ma JN, Wang Y, Zhang L et al (2018) Clinical study of suction loss in small incision lenticule extraction. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 54:890–896PubMed
13.
go back to reference Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS et al (2018) Suction stability management in SMILE: development of a decision tree for managing eye movements and suction loss. J Refract Surg 34:809–816CrossRefPubMed Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS et al (2018) Suction stability management in SMILE: development of a decision tree for managing eye movements and suction loss. J Refract Surg 34:809–816CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Park JH, Koo HJ (2017) Comparison of immediate small-incision lenticule extraction after suction loss with uneventful small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:466–472CrossRefPubMed Park JH, Koo HJ (2017) Comparison of immediate small-incision lenticule extraction after suction loss with uneventful small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:466–472CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Mello GR et al (2012) Suction loss during thin-flap femto-LASIK: management and beneficial refractive effect of the epithelium. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:902–905CrossRefPubMed Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Mello GR et al (2012) Suction loss during thin-flap femto-LASIK: management and beneficial refractive effect of the epithelium. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:902–905CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Liu YC, Rosman M, Mehta JS (2017) Enhancement after small-incision lenticule extraction: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Ophthalmology 124:813–821CrossRefPubMed Liu YC, Rosman M, Mehta JS (2017) Enhancement after small-incision lenticule extraction: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Ophthalmology 124:813–821CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Meldrum D, Jahn K (2019) Gaze stabilisation exercises in vestibular rehabilitation: review of the evidence and recent clinical advances. J Neurol 266:11–18CrossRefPubMed Meldrum D, Jahn K (2019) Gaze stabilisation exercises in vestibular rehabilitation: review of the evidence and recent clinical advances. J Neurol 266:11–18CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Grading for suction loss in small incision lenticule extraction
Authors
Qing Huang
Lina Liu
Pingqi Ma
Yulin Sun
Zhiqiang Wang
Ji Bai
Ting Liu
Publication date
31-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Keywords
Incision
Laser
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02456-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

International Ophthalmology 2/2023 Go to the issue