Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 6/2023

14-09-2023 | Incision | Research

100 Complex posterior spinal fusion cases performed with robotic instrumentation

Authors: Brian McCormick, Paul L. Asdourian, Douglass C. Johnson, Bradley W. Moatz, Grant T. Duvall, Mosope T. Soda, Anna R. Beaufort, Liana G. Chotikul, Paul C. McAfee

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 6/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic navigation has been shown to increase precision, accuracy, and safety during spinal reconstructive procedures. There is a paucity of literature describing the best techniques for robotic-assisted spine surgery for complex, multilevel cases or in cases of significant deformity correction. We present a case series of 100 consecutive multilevel posterior spinal fusion procedures performed for multilevel spinal disease and/or deformity correction. 100 consecutive posterior spinal fusions were performed for multilevel disease and/or deformity correction utilizing robotic-assisted placement of pedicle screws. The primary outcome was surgery-related failure, which was defined as hardware breakage or reoperation with removal of hardware. A total of 100 consecutive patients met inclusion criteria. Among cases included, 31 were revision surgeries with existing hardware in place. The mean number of levels fused was 5.6, the mean operative time was 303 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 469 mL. 28 cases included robotic-assisted placement of S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws. In total, 1043 pedicle screws and 53 S2AI screws were placed with robotic-assistance. The failure rate using survivorship analysis was 18/1043 (1.7%) and the failure rate of S2AI screws using survivorship analysis was 3/53 (5.7%). Four patients developed postoperative wound infections requiring irrigation and debridement procedures. None of the 1043 pedicle screws nor the 53 S2AI screws required reoperation due to malpositioning or suboptimal placement. This case series of 100 multilevel posterior spinal fusion procedures demonstrates promising results with low failure rates. With 1043 pedicle screws and 53 S2AI screws, we report low failure rates of 1.7% and 5.7%, respectively with zero cases of screw malpositioning. Robotic screw placement allows for accurate screw placement with no increased rate of postoperative infection compared to historical controls. Level of evidence: IV, Retrospective review.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A (2011) The rate of screw misplacement in segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop 82:50–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A (2011) The rate of screw misplacement in segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop 82:50–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Gaines RW Jr (2000) The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1458–1476CrossRefPubMed Gaines RW Jr (2000) The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1458–1476CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29:333–342CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29:333–342CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Khan A, Meyers JE, Siasios I, Pollina J (2019) Next-generation robotic spine surgery: first report on feasibility, safety, and learning curve. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 17:61–69CrossRefPubMed Khan A, Meyers JE, Siasios I, Pollina J (2019) Next-generation robotic spine surgery: first report on feasibility, safety, and learning curve. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 17:61–69CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jain D et al (2019) Initial single-institution experience with a novel robotic-navigation system for thoracolumbar pedicle screw and pelvic screw placement with 643 screws. Int J Spine Surg 13:459–463CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jain D et al (2019) Initial single-institution experience with a novel robotic-navigation system for thoracolumbar pedicle screw and pelvic screw placement with 643 screws. Int J Spine Surg 13:459–463CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Huntsman KT, Ahrendtsen LA, Riggleman JR, Ledonio CG (2020) Robotic-assisted navigated minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the first 100 cases at a single institution. J Robot Surg 14:199–203CrossRefPubMed Huntsman KT, Ahrendtsen LA, Riggleman JR, Ledonio CG (2020) Robotic-assisted navigated minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the first 100 cases at a single institution. J Robot Surg 14:199–203CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wallace DJ et al (2020) Navigated robotic assistance improves pedicle screw accuracy in minimally invasive surgery of the lumbosacral spine: 600 pedicle screws in a single institution. Int J Med Robot 16:e2054CrossRefPubMed Wallace DJ et al (2020) Navigated robotic assistance improves pedicle screw accuracy in minimally invasive surgery of the lumbosacral spine: 600 pedicle screws in a single institution. Int J Med Robot 16:e2054CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lieber AM, Kirchner GJ, Kerbel YE, Khalsa AS (2019) Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement fails to reduce overall postoperative complications in fusion surgery. Spine J 19:212–217CrossRefPubMed Lieber AM, Kirchner GJ, Kerbel YE, Khalsa AS (2019) Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement fails to reduce overall postoperative complications in fusion surgery. Spine J 19:212–217CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 25:606–614CrossRefPubMed Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 25:606–614CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C (2007) Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 32:E111–E120CrossRefPubMed Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C (2007) Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 32:E111–E120CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
100 Complex posterior spinal fusion cases performed with robotic instrumentation
Authors
Brian McCormick
Paul L. Asdourian
Douglass C. Johnson
Bradley W. Moatz
Grant T. Duvall
Mosope T. Soda
Anna R. Beaufort
Liana G. Chotikul
Paul C. McAfee
Publication date
14-09-2023
Publisher
Springer London
Keyword
Incision
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01707-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Journal of Robotic Surgery 6/2023 Go to the issue