Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neuroradiology 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Incidental extracerebral findings on brain nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging: frequency, nondetection rate, and clinical importance

Authors: Ming-Liang Wang, Li-Yan Lu, Xiao-Er Wei, Wen-Bin Li

Published in: Neuroradiology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to elucidate the frequency, nondetection rate, and clinical importance of incidental extracerebral findings (IECFs) on brain nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

A total of 8284 brain MRIs performed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015 were evaluated for the presence of IECFs and the distribution of IECFs was analyzed. IECFs were categorized as E1 (clinically unimportant, e.g., sinus mucosal thickening); E2 (likely unimportant, e.g., pharyngeal mucosal symmetrical thickening); and E3 (potentially important, e.g., pharyngeal mucosal asymmetrical thickening). The nondetection rate was determined by comparing the results of the structured approach with the initial MRI reports. The medical records were examined for patients with E3 IECFs to assess clinical importance and outcome of these lesions.

Results

A total of 5992 IECFs were found in 4469 of the 8284 patients (54.0%). E1 findings constituted 82.2% (4924/5992) of all IECFs; E2 constituted 16.6% (995/5992) and E3 constituted 1.2% (73/5992). Overall IECFs and E1 findings were significantly more common in male patients (P < 0.05). Statistically significant difference was also seen between the different age groups (P < 0.001). The nondetection rate was 56.9% (3409/5992) for overall IECFs and 32.9% (24/73) for E3 IECFs. Of the 73 patients with E3 IECFs, 34 (46.6%) received final diagnosis and appropriate treatment during the study period.

Conclusions

IECFs are prevalent in clinical patients on brain MR images with a nondetection rate of 32.9% for potentially important (E3) findings. The reporting of IECFs according to clinical importance is helpful for patients’ management.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Grossman RI, Bernat JL (2004) Incidental research imaging findings: Pandora’s costly box. Neurology 62(6):849–850CrossRefPubMed Grossman RI, Bernat JL (2004) Incidental research imaging findings: Pandora’s costly box. Neurology 62(6):849–850CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wardlaw JM, Davies H, Booth TC, Laurie G, Compston A, Freeman C, Leach MO, Waldman AD, Lomas DJ, Kessler K, Crabbe F, Jackson A (2015) Acting on incidental findings in research imaging. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 351:h5190. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5190 Wardlaw JM, Davies H, Booth TC, Laurie G, Compston A, Freeman C, Leach MO, Waldman AD, Lomas DJ, Kessler K, Crabbe F, Jackson A (2015) Acting on incidental findings in research imaging. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 351:h5190. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​h5190
7.
go back to reference Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ (1999) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA 282(1):36–39CrossRefPubMed Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ (1999) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA 282(1):36–39CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Niessen WJ, Breteler MM, van der Lugt A (2007) Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 357(18):1821–1828. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070972 CrossRefPubMed Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Niessen WJ, Breteler MM, van der Lugt A (2007) Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 357(18):1821–1828. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa070972 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Morris Z, Whiteley WN, Longstreth WT Jr, Weber F, Lee YC, Tsushima Y, Alphs H, Ladd SC, Warlow C, Wardlaw JM, Al-Shahi Salman R (2009) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 339:b3016. doi:10.1136/bmj.b3016 CrossRef Morris Z, Whiteley WN, Longstreth WT Jr, Weber F, Lee YC, Tsushima Y, Alphs H, Ladd SC, Warlow C, Wardlaw JM, Al-Shahi Salman R (2009) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 339:b3016. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​b3016 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gur RE, Kaltman D, Melhem ER, Ruparel K, Prabhakaran K, Riley M, Yodh E, Hakonarson H, Satterthwaite T, Gur RC (2013) Incidental findings in youths volunteering for brain MRI research. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34(10):2021–2025. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3525 CrossRefPubMed Gur RE, Kaltman D, Melhem ER, Ruparel K, Prabhakaran K, Riley M, Yodh E, Hakonarson H, Satterthwaite T, Gur RC (2013) Incidental findings in youths volunteering for brain MRI research. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34(10):2021–2025. doi:10.​3174/​ajnr.​A3525 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Boutet C, Vassal F, Celle S, Schneider FC, Barthelemy JC, Laurent B, Barral FG, Roche F (2016) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly: the PROOF study. Brain imaging and behavior. doi:10.1007/s11682-016-9519-4 PubMed Boutet C, Vassal F, Celle S, Schneider FC, Barthelemy JC, Laurent B, Barral FG, Roche F (2016) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly: the PROOF study. Brain imaging and behavior. doi:10.​1007/​s11682-016-9519-4 PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bos D, Poels MM, Adams HH, Akoudad S, Cremers LG, Zonneveld HI, Hoogendam YY, Verhaaren BF, Verlinden VJ, Verbruggen JG, Peymani A, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Vincent AJ, Feelders RA, Koudstaal PJ, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA, Vernooij MW (2016) Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images: the population-based Rotterdam scan study. Radiology 281(2):507–515. doi:10.1148/radiol.2016160218 CrossRefPubMed Bos D, Poels MM, Adams HH, Akoudad S, Cremers LG, Zonneveld HI, Hoogendam YY, Verhaaren BF, Verlinden VJ, Verbruggen JG, Peymani A, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Vincent AJ, Feelders RA, Koudstaal PJ, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA, Vernooij MW (2016) Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images: the population-based Rotterdam scan study. Radiology 281(2):507–515. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2016160218 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, Glick SN, Laghi A, Macari M, McFarland EG, Morrin MM, Pickhardt PJ, Soto J, Yee J (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236(1):3–9. doi:10.1148/radiol.2361041926 CrossRefPubMed Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, Glick SN, Laghi A, Macari M, McFarland EG, Morrin MM, Pickhardt PJ, Soto J, Yee J (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236(1):3–9. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2361041926 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hegenscheid K, Seipel R, Schmidt CO, Volzke H, Kuhn JP, Biffar R, Kroemer HK, Hosten N, Puls R (2013) Potentially relevant incidental findings on research whole-body MRI in the general adult population: frequencies and management. Eur Radiol 23(3):816–826. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2636-6 CrossRefPubMed Hegenscheid K, Seipel R, Schmidt CO, Volzke H, Kuhn JP, Biffar R, Kroemer HK, Hosten N, Puls R (2013) Potentially relevant incidental findings on research whole-body MRI in the general adult population: frequencies and management. Eur Radiol 23(3):816–826. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-012-2636-6 CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Vogler RC, Ii FJ, Pilgram TK (2000) Age-specific size of the normal adenoid pad on magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences 25(5):392–395CrossRefPubMed Vogler RC, Ii FJ, Pilgram TK (2000) Age-specific size of the normal adenoid pad on magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences 25(5):392–395CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Liu XW, Xie CM, Mo YX, Zhang R, Li H, Huang ZL, Geng ZJ, Zheng L, Lv YC, Wu PH (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: are there differences? Eur J Radiol 81(6):1146–1154. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.066 CrossRefPubMed Liu XW, Xie CM, Mo YX, Zhang R, Li H, Huang ZL, Geng ZJ, Zheng L, Lv YC, Wu PH (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: are there differences? Eur J Radiol 81(6):1146–1154. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2011.​03.​066 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Incidental extracerebral findings on brain nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging: frequency, nondetection rate, and clinical importance
Authors
Ming-Liang Wang
Li-Yan Lu
Xiao-Er Wei
Wen-Bin Li
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neuroradiology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-017-1810-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Neuroradiology 3/2017 Go to the issue