Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2006

01-07-2006 | Original Article

Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients

Authors: Akihito Nakai, Atsuko Yoshida, Satoru Yamaguchi, Ikuno Kawabata, Masako Hayashi, Akishige Yokota, Taichi Isozaki, Toshiyuki Takeshita

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of severe perineal lacerations defined as either third- or fourth-degree lacerations during normal spontaneous vaginal delivery and to evaluate potential risk factors in Japanese patients. Materials and methods: An electronic audit of the perinatal database at the Tama-Nagayama Hospital of Nippon Medical School and Yamaguchi Hospital from 1997 through 2004 was completed. Singleton vaginal vertex deliveries were analyzed for potential risk factors using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: From the database, 7,946 deliveries were identified, with 135 deliveries resulting in severe lacerations (1.7%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, severe lacerations were associated significantly with primiparous (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.17–9.57), oxytocin use (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.27–3.73), midline episiotomy (odds ratio, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.09–11.55), forceps-assisted delivery (odds ratio, 7.11; 95% CI, 1.95–20.59), vacuum-assisted delivery (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% CI, 3.38–10.36), and shorter attendant experience (odds ratio, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.12–9.81). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that operator factors, such as midline episiotomy, oxytocin use, assisted delivery and attendant experience, are independent risk for severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients. The results suggest that midline episiotomy and assisted vaginal delivery, especially forceps-assisted delivery should be avoided in patients who are being delivered of a first child whenever possible.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sultan A, Kamm M, Hudson C, Bartran C (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears; risk factors and outcome of primary repair. Br Med J 308:887–891 Sultan A, Kamm M, Hudson C, Bartran C (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears; risk factors and outcome of primary repair. Br Med J 308:887–891
2.
go back to reference Gjessing H, Backe B, Sahlin Y (1998) Third degree obstetric tears: outcome after primary repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77:736–740PubMedCrossRef Gjessing H, Backe B, Sahlin Y (1998) Third degree obstetric tears: outcome after primary repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77:736–740PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Merrill D, Zlatnik FJ (1999) Risk of repetition of severe perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol 93:1021–1024PubMedCrossRef Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Merrill D, Zlatnik FJ (1999) Risk of repetition of severe perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol 93:1021–1024PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Moller Bek K, Laurberg S (1992) Intervention during labor: risk factors associated with complete tear of the anal sphincter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 71:520–524PubMedCrossRef Moller Bek K, Laurberg S (1992) Intervention during labor: risk factors associated with complete tear of the anal sphincter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 71:520–524PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Signorello LB, Harlow BT, Chekos AK, Repke JT (2000) Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study. Br Med J 320:86–91CrossRef Signorello LB, Harlow BT, Chekos AK, Repke JT (2000) Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study. Br Med J 320:86–91CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Riskin-Mashiah S, Smith EO, Wilkins IA (2002) Risk factors for severe perineal tear: can we do better? Am J Perinatol 19:225–234PubMedCrossRef Riskin-Mashiah S, Smith EO, Wilkins IA (2002) Risk factors for severe perineal tear: can we do better? Am J Perinatol 19:225–234PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goldberg J, Hyslop T, Tolosa JE, Sultana C (2003) Racial defferences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1063–1067PubMedCrossRef Goldberg J, Hyslop T, Tolosa JE, Sultana C (2003) Racial defferences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1063–1067PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Anthony S, Buitendijk S, Zondervan K, Van Rijssel E, Verkerk P (1994) Episiotomies and the occurence of severe perineal lacerations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:1064–1067PubMed Anthony S, Buitendijk S, Zondervan K, Van Rijssel E, Verkerk P (1994) Episiotomies and the occurence of severe perineal lacerations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:1064–1067PubMed
9.
go back to reference Walsh C, Mooney E, Upton G, Motson R (1996) Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair. Br J Surg 83:218–221PubMedCrossRef Walsh C, Mooney E, Upton G, Motson R (1996) Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair. Br J Surg 83:218–221PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wood J, Amos L, Rieger N (1998) Third degree anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 38:414–417CrossRef Wood J, Amos L, Rieger N (1998) Third degree anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 38:414–417CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Green J, Soohoo S (1989) Factors associated with rectal injury in spontaneous deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 75:732–738 Green J, Soohoo S (1989) Factors associated with rectal injury in spontaneous deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 75:732–738
12.
go back to reference Shiono P, Klebanoff M, Carey J (1990) Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet Gynecol 75:765–770PubMed Shiono P, Klebanoff M, Carey J (1990) Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet Gynecol 75:765–770PubMed
13.
go back to reference Nager CW, Halliwell JP (2001) Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:444–450PubMedCrossRef Nager CW, Halliwell JP (2001) Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:444–450PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Labrecque M, Baillargeon L, Dallaire M et al (1997) Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women. Can Med Assoc J 156:797–802 Labrecque M, Baillargeon L, Dallaire M et al (1997) Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women. Can Med Assoc J 156:797–802
15.
go back to reference Combs C, Robertson P, Laros RJ (1990) Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:100–104PubMed Combs C, Robertson P, Laros RJ (1990) Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:100–104PubMed
16.
go back to reference Angioli R, Gomez-Marin O, Cantuaria G, O’Sullivan MJ (2000) Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the university of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1083–1085PubMedCrossRef Angioli R, Gomez-Marin O, Cantuaria G, O’Sullivan MJ (2000) Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the university of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1083–1085PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Woolley R (1995) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50:806–835PubMedCrossRef Woolley R (1995) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50:806–835PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Poen A, Felt-Bersma R, Dekker G et al (1997) Third degree obstetric perineal tear: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:563–566PubMed Poen A, Felt-Bersma R, Dekker G et al (1997) Third degree obstetric perineal tear: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:563–566PubMed
Metadata
Title
Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients
Authors
Akihito Nakai
Atsuko Yoshida
Satoru Yamaguchi
Ikuno Kawabata
Masako Hayashi
Akishige Yokota
Taichi Isozaki
Toshiyuki Takeshita
Publication date
01-07-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0168-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2006 Go to the issue