Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 2/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Incapacitation recovery times from a conductive electrical weapon exposure

Authors: John C. Criscione, Mark W. Kroll

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Law enforcement officers expect that a TASER® CEW (Conducted Electrical Weapon) broad-spread probe exposure will temporarily incapacitate a subject who will then be able to immediately (~1 s delay) recover motor control in order to comply with commands. However, this recovery time has not been previously reported.

Methods

A total of 32 police academy students were exposed to a very broad-spread 5 s CEW stimulus as part of their training and told to depress a push-button as soon as they sensed the stimulus. A subgroup also depressed the push-button after being alerted by an audio stimulus.

Results

The response time after the audio trigger was 1.05 ± 0.25 s; the median was 1.04 s (range 0.69–1.34 s). For the paired CEW triggered group the mean response time was 1.41 ± 0.61 s with a median of 1.06 s (range 0.92–2.18 s), which was not statistically different. Only 2/32 subjects were able to depress the button during the CEW exposure and with delays of 3.09 and 4.70 s from the start. Of the remaining 30 subjects the mean response time to execute the task (once the CEW exposure ended) was 1.27 ± 0.58 s with a median of 1.19 s (range 0.31–2.99 s) (NS vs. the audio trigger).

Conclusions

With a very-broad electrode spread, a CEW exposure could prevent or delay some purposeful movements. Normal reaction times appear to return immediately (~1 s) after the CEW exposure ceases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chan T, Sloane C, Neuman T, Levine S, Castillo E, Vilke G, et al. The impact of the taser weapon on respiratory and ventilatory function in human subjects. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:191–2.CrossRef Chan T, Sloane C, Neuman T, Levine S, Castillo E, Vilke G, et al. The impact of the taser weapon on respiratory and ventilatory function in human subjects. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:191–2.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dawes DM, Ho JD, Johnson MA, Lundin E, Janchar TA, Miner JR. 15-Second conducted electrical weapon exposure does not cause core temperature elevation in non-environmentally stressed resting adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;176(2–3):253–7.PubMedCrossRef Dawes DM, Ho JD, Johnson MA, Lundin E, Janchar TA, Miner JR. 15-Second conducted electrical weapon exposure does not cause core temperature elevation in non-environmentally stressed resting adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;176(2–3):253–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dawes DM, Ho JD, Reardon RF, Miner JR. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic effects of a long duration electronic control device exposure in human volunteers. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010;6(4):268–74.PubMedCrossRef Dawes DM, Ho JD, Reardon RF, Miner JR. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic effects of a long duration electronic control device exposure in human volunteers. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010;6(4):268–74.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ho JD, Dawes DM, Chang RJ, Nelson RS, Miner JR. Physiologic effects of a new-generation conducted electrical weapon on human volunteers. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(3):428–35.PubMedCrossRef Ho JD, Dawes DM, Chang RJ, Nelson RS, Miner JR. Physiologic effects of a new-generation conducted electrical weapon on human volunteers. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(3):428–35.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ho JD, Dawes DM, Heegaard WG, Calkins HG, Moscati RM, Miner JR. Absence of electrocardiographic change after prolonged application of a conducted electrical weapon in physically exhausted adults. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(5):466–72.PubMedCrossRef Ho JD, Dawes DM, Heegaard WG, Calkins HG, Moscati RM, Miner JR. Absence of electrocardiographic change after prolonged application of a conducted electrical weapon in physically exhausted adults. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(5):466–72.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ho JD, Dawes DM, Nelson RS, Lundin EJ, Ryan FJ, Overton KG, et al. Acidosis and catecholamine evaluation following simulated law enforcement “use of force” encounters. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(7):e60–8.PubMedCrossRef Ho JD, Dawes DM, Nelson RS, Lundin EJ, Ryan FJ, Overton KG, et al. Acidosis and catecholamine evaluation following simulated law enforcement “use of force” encounters. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(7):e60–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ho JD, Dawes DM, Reardon RF, Strote SR, Kunz SN, Nelson RS, et al. Human cardiovascular effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204(1–3):50–7.PubMedCrossRef Ho JD, Dawes DM, Reardon RF, Strote SR, Kunz SN, Nelson RS, et al. Human cardiovascular effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204(1–3):50–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Levine SD, Sloane CM, Chan TC, Dunford JV, Vilke GM. Cardiac monitoring of human subjects exposed to the TASER. J Emerg Med. 2007;33(2):113–7.PubMedCrossRef Levine SD, Sloane CM, Chan TC, Dunford JV, Vilke GM. Cardiac monitoring of human subjects exposed to the TASER. J Emerg Med. 2007;33(2):113–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sloane CM, Chan TC, Levine SD, Dunford JV, Neuman T, Vilke GM. Serum troponin I measurement of subjects exposed to the Taser X-26. J Emerg Med. 2008;35(1):29–32.PubMedCrossRef Sloane CM, Chan TC, Levine SD, Dunford JV, Neuman T, Vilke GM. Serum troponin I measurement of subjects exposed to the Taser X-26. J Emerg Med. 2008;35(1):29–32.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vilke GM, Sloane C, Levine S, Neuman T, Castillo E, Chan TC. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram monitoring of subjects before and after voluntary exposure to the Taser X26. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(1):1–4.PubMedCrossRef Vilke GM, Sloane C, Levine S, Neuman T, Castillo E, Chan TC. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram monitoring of subjects before and after voluntary exposure to the Taser X26. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(1):1–4.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vilke GM, Sloane CM, Bouton KD, Kolkhorst FW, Levine SD, Neuman TS, et al. Physiological effects of a conducted electrical weapon on human subjects. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(5):569–75.PubMedCrossRef Vilke GM, Sloane CM, Bouton KD, Kolkhorst FW, Levine SD, Neuman TS, et al. Physiological effects of a conducted electrical weapon on human subjects. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(5):569–75.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference MacDonald JM, Kaminski RJ, Smith MR. The effect of less-lethal weapons on injuries in police use-of-force events. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(12):2268–74.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef MacDonald JM, Kaminski RJ, Smith MR. The effect of less-lethal weapons on injuries in police use-of-force events. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(12):2268–74.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Reilly J, Diamant A, Comeaux J. Dosimetry considerations for electrical stun devices. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:1319–35.CrossRef Reilly J, Diamant A, Comeaux J. Dosimetry considerations for electrical stun devices. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:1319–35.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference White M, Ready J. The TASER as a less lethal force alternative. Findings on use and effectiveness in a large metropolitan police agency. Police Q. 2007;10(2):170–91. White M, Ready J. The TASER as a less lethal force alternative. Findings on use and effectiveness in a large metropolitan police agency. Police Q. 2007;10(2):170–91.
17.
go back to reference Brewer J, Kroll M. Field statistics overview. In: Kroll M, Ho J, editors. TASER conducted electrical weapons: physiology, pathology, and law. New York City: Springer-Kluwer; 2009. Brewer J, Kroll M. Field statistics overview. In: Kroll M, Ho J, editors. TASER conducted electrical weapons: physiology, pathology, and law. New York City: Springer-Kluwer; 2009.
18.
go back to reference Mesloh C, Henych M, Wolf R. Less lethal weapon effectiveness, use of force, and suspect & officer injuries: a five-year analysis. Report to the National Institute of Justice. 2008. Mesloh C, Henych M, Wolf R. Less lethal weapon effectiveness, use of force, and suspect & officer injuries: a five-year analysis. Report to the National Institute of Justice. 2008.
19.
go back to reference Dawes DM, Ho JD, Vincent AS, Nystrom PC, Moore JC, Steinberg LW, et al. The neurocognitive effects of simulated use-of-force scenarios. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014;10(1):9–17.PubMedCrossRef Dawes DM, Ho JD, Vincent AS, Nystrom PC, Moore JC, Steinberg LW, et al. The neurocognitive effects of simulated use-of-force scenarios. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014;10(1):9–17.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference McQueen v. Johnson, 506 Fed. Appx. 909, 913 (C.A.11 (Fla.) 5 Feb 2013. McQueen v. Johnson, 506 Fed. Appx. 909, 913 (C.A.11 (Fla.) 5 Feb 2013.
21.
go back to reference State of Louisiana vs. Scott. A. Nugent. Eighth Judicial District Court, State of Louisiana, Parish of Winn. Oct 30, 2010. State of Louisiana vs. Scott. A. Nugent. Eighth Judicial District Court, State of Louisiana, Parish of Winn. Oct 30, 2010.
22.
go back to reference Ho J, Dawes D, Miner J, Kunz S, Nelson R, Sweeney J. Conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task as a function of probe spread. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8(4):358–66.PubMedCrossRef Ho J, Dawes D, Miner J, Kunz S, Nelson R, Sweeney J. Conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task as a function of probe spread. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8(4):358–66.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Incapacitation recovery times from a conductive electrical weapon exposure
Authors
John C. Criscione
Mark W. Kroll
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9551-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 2/2014 Go to the issue