Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 9/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

In vivo study for tooth colour determination—visual versus digital

Authors: Jan Brandt, Shirley Nelson, Hans-Christoph Lauer, Ulrike von Hehn, Silvia Brandt

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Tooth colour determination is an essential component in the preservative and prosthetic workflow during production of tooth-coloured restorations. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical suitability of conventional, visual tooth colour determination and digital methods.

Materials and methods

Tooth colour of vital, natural central incisors among a total of 107 subjects was determined visually by a dentist (VD) and dental technician (VDT) using VITA Toothguide 3D-MASTER®, digitally by the spectrophotometer VITA Easyshade Advance 4.0 (reference instrument) and Trios®Color intra-oral scanner (test subject). Reliability was examined by repeating the digital measurements of 20 teeth three times. The analysis was based on the recorded 3D-MASTER values and L*a*b/L*C*h parameters.

Results

The measuring accuracy was 43.9% with the Trios®Color scanner, 35.5% for VD and 34.6% for VDT. In 25.5% of cases, the scanner’s results corresponded with VD and in 33.6% with VDT. The visual methods corresponded with 45.8%. All mean values of the recorded colour differences fell within the clinically acceptable range of ΔE ≤ 6.8. The intra-oral scanner attained repeatability of 78.3% and the VITA Easyshade system of 76.6%.

Conclusions

The Trios®Color intra-oral scanner appears to be a good alternative to the current standard of visual tooth colour determination. The new module attains better results than the visual method and is comparable to the reference instrument.

Clinical relevance

Dentistry becomes increasingly digitalized and tooth colour determination devices have generally to be improved. Therefore, the investigation of a new digital device is important for future developments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strub JR, Kern M, Türp JC, Witkowski S (2011) Ästhetik in der Zahnmedizin. In: Strub JR (ed) Curriculum Prothetik band II, vol 4. Quintessenz Verlag, Berlin, pp 373–404 Strub JR, Kern M, Türp JC, Witkowski S (2011) Ästhetik in der Zahnmedizin. In: Strub JR (ed) Curriculum Prothetik band II, vol 4. Quintessenz Verlag, Berlin, pp 373–404
3.
go back to reference Corcodel N, Zenthofer A, Setz J, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ (2011) Estimating costs for shade matching and shade corrections of fixed partial dentures for dental technicians in Germany: a pilot investigation. Acta Odontol Scand 69(5):319–320. doi:10.3109/00016357.2011.568964 CrossRefPubMed Corcodel N, Zenthofer A, Setz J, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ (2011) Estimating costs for shade matching and shade corrections of fixed partial dentures for dental technicians in Germany: a pilot investigation. Acta Odontol Scand 69(5):319–320. doi:10.​3109/​00016357.​2011.​568964 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Faber FJ (2002) Die Bestimmung der Zahnfarbe. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 57(8):448–449 Faber FJ (2002) Die Bestimmung der Zahnfarbe. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 57(8):448–449
6.
go back to reference Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N (2004) Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 24(3):222–231PubMed Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N (2004) Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 24(3):222–231PubMed
8.
go back to reference Todorovic A, Todorovic A, Gostovic AS, Lazic V, Milicic B, Djurisic S (2013) Reliability of conventional shade guides in teeth color determination. Vojnosanit Pregl 70(10):929–934CrossRefPubMed Todorovic A, Todorovic A, Gostovic AS, Lazic V, Milicic B, Djurisic S (2013) Reliability of conventional shade guides in teeth color determination. Vojnosanit Pregl 70(10):929–934CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammerle CH (2002) Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 81(8):578–582CrossRefPubMed Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammerle CH (2002) Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 81(8):578–582CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Paravina RD, Majkic G, Stalker JR, Kiat-Amnuay S, Chen JW (2008) Development of a model shade guide for primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9(2):74–78CrossRefPubMed Paravina RD, Majkic G, Stalker JR, Kiat-Amnuay S, Chen JW (2008) Development of a model shade guide for primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9(2):74–78CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Reich S (2014) Die Bedeutung der intraoralen optischen Abformung in der Implantatprothetik. In: Wolfart S (ed) Implantatprothetik - Ein patientenorientiertes Konzept. Quintessenz Verlag, Berlin, pp 361–391 Reich S (2014) Die Bedeutung der intraoralen optischen Abformung in der Implantatprothetik. In: Wolfart S (ed) Implantatprothetik - Ein patientenorientiertes Konzept. Quintessenz Verlag, Berlin, pp 361–391
15.
go back to reference Hack GD, Patzelt SBM (2015) Evaluating of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Professional Product Review 10(4):1–5 Hack GD, Patzelt SBM (2015) Evaluating of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Professional Product Review 10(4):1–5
17.
go back to reference Vivek R, Singh A, Soni R, Singh SV, Chaturvedi TP (2013) Conventional and digitally assisted shade matching—a comparative study. Indian J Dent 4(4):191–199CrossRef Vivek R, Singh A, Soni R, Singh SV, Chaturvedi TP (2013) Conventional and digitally assisted shade matching—a comparative study. Indian J Dent 4(4):191–199CrossRef
19.
25.
go back to reference Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM (2002) Color comparison of two shade guides. Int J Prosthodont 15(1):73–78PubMed Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM (2002) Color comparison of two shade guides. Int J Prosthodont 15(1):73–78PubMed
26.
go back to reference Baltzer A, Kaufmann-Jinoian V (2004) Die Bestimmung der Zahnfarben. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 30(7):726–740 Baltzer A, Kaufmann-Jinoian V (2004) Die Bestimmung der Zahnfarben. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 30(7):726–740
27.
go back to reference Capa N, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Calikkocaoglu S (2010) Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople. J Am Dent Assoc 141(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed Capa N, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Calikkocaoglu S (2010) Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople. J Am Dent Assoc 141(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Johnston WM, Kao EC (1989) Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 68(5):819–822CrossRefPubMed Johnston WM, Kao EC (1989) Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 68(5):819–822CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ragain JC, Jonston WM (2000) Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers. Color Res Appl 25:278–285CrossRef Ragain JC, Jonston WM (2000) Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers. Color Res Appl 25:278–285CrossRef
Metadata
Title
In vivo study for tooth colour determination—visual versus digital
Authors
Jan Brandt
Shirley Nelson
Hans-Christoph Lauer
Ulrike von Hehn
Silvia Brandt
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2088-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Clinical Oral Investigations 9/2017 Go to the issue