Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2022

03-10-2021 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after the ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block and bone–patellar tendon–bone graft

Authors: Martin Komzák, Radek Hart, David Náhlík, Robert Vysoký

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 8/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this prospective randomised study was to evaluate clinical results and rotational stability at least 2 years after single-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block (BT) and bone–patellar tendon–bone graft (BTB).

Materials and methods

In both groups (BT and BTB), 40 patients selected prospectively at random were evaluated. The mean follow-up after the surgery was 28 months (range 24–33 months). A navigation system was used to measure rotational stability of the knee joint. Cincinnati, Lysholm, and IKDC scores and visual analog score (VAS) were used to evaluate clinical results and the non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for the statistical analysis.

Results

After the BT reconstruction, the mean internal rotation of the tibia (IR) was 9.5°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, IR was 8.6° at average. After the BTB reconstruction, the mean IR was 9.9°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, IR was 8.7° at average. We did not find any statistically significant difference in IR stability between BT and BTB reconstruction. In terms of clinical results, regarding the VAS, patients perceive significantly more pain after the BTB reconstruction (p < 0.05). Kneeling was reported more difficult and painful after BTB reconstruction.

Conclusions

The BT reconstruction of the ACL provides similar clinical results, less pain, better flexion and the same rotational stability of the knee in comparison with the BTB reconstruction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lorbach O, Pape D, Maas S, Zerbe T, Busch L, Kohn D (2010) Influence of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament on external and internal tibiofemoral rotation. Am J Sports Med 38(4):721–727CrossRef Lorbach O, Pape D, Maas S, Zerbe T, Busch L, Kohn D (2010) Influence of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament on external and internal tibiofemoral rotation. Am J Sports Med 38(4):721–727CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Monaco E, Ferretti A, Labianca L, Maestri B, Speranza A, Kelly MJ (2012) Navigated knee kinematics after cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(5):870–877CrossRef Monaco E, Ferretti A, Labianca L, Maestri B, Speranza A, Kelly MJ (2012) Navigated knee kinematics after cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(5):870–877CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CAQ, Anderst W, Tashman S (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:1418–1426CrossRef Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CAQ, Anderst W, Tashman S (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:1418–1426CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Martins CAQ, Kropf EJ, Shen W, van Eck CF, Fu FH (2008) The concept of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Sports Med 16:104–115CrossRef Martins CAQ, Kropf EJ, Shen W, van Eck CF, Fu FH (2008) The concept of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Sports Med 16:104–115CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Steckel H, Fu FH, Baums MH, Klinger HM (2009) Arthroscopic evaluation of the ACL double bundle structure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:782–785CrossRef Steckel H, Fu FH, Baums MH, Klinger HM (2009) Arthroscopic evaluation of the ACL double bundle structure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:782–785CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bedi A, Musahl V, O’oughlin P, Maak T, Citak M, Dixon P (2010) A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics. Am J Sports Med 38:1788–1794CrossRef Bedi A, Musahl V, O’oughlin P, Maak T, Citak M, Dixon P (2010) A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics. Am J Sports Med 38:1788–1794CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ho JY, Gardiner A, Shah V (2009) Equal kinematics between central anatomic single-bundle and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 25:464–472CrossRef Ho JY, Gardiner A, Shah V (2009) Equal kinematics between central anatomic single-bundle and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 25:464–472CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hofbauer M, Valentin P, Polsky R, Ostermann RC, Graf A, Figl M (2010) Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1201–1207CrossRef Hofbauer M, Valentin P, Polsky R, Ostermann RC, Graf A, Figl M (2010) Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1201–1207CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Colombet P, Robinson J, Kristel O, Franceschi JP, Djian P (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction. Current orthopaedic practice 454:59–65 Colombet P, Robinson J, Kristel O, Franceschi JP, Djian P (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction. Current orthopaedic practice 454:59–65
10.
go back to reference Song EK, Oh LS, Gill TJ, Li G, Gadikota HR, Seon JK (2009) Prospective comparative study of anterior ligament reconstruction using the double-bundle and single bundle technique. Am J Sports Med 37(1705):1705–1711CrossRef Song EK, Oh LS, Gill TJ, Li G, Gadikota HR, Seon JK (2009) Prospective comparative study of anterior ligament reconstruction using the double-bundle and single bundle technique. Am J Sports Med 37(1705):1705–1711CrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Hoshino Y (2013) Can joint contact dynamics be restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:2924–2931CrossRef Hoshino Y (2013) Can joint contact dynamics be restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:2924–2931CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chouteau J (2012) Knee rotational laxity and proprioceptive function 2 years after partial ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(4):762–766CrossRef Chouteau J (2012) Knee rotational laxity and proprioceptive function 2 years after partial ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(4):762–766CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gobbi A (2012) Single versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year follow-up? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):824–834CrossRef Gobbi A (2012) Single versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year follow-up? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):824–834CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Suomalainen P (2012) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomised study with 5-year results. Am J Sports Med 40(7):1511–1518CrossRef Suomalainen P (2012) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomised study with 5-year results. Am J Sports Med 40(7):1511–1518CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ (2017) Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(10):2459–2468CrossRef Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ (2017) Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(10):2459–2468CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q (2015) A meta-analysis of bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 22(2):100–110CrossRef Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q (2015) A meta-analysis of bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 22(2):100–110CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fink C, Lawton R, Förschner F, Gföller P, Herbort M, Hoser C (2018) Minimally invasive quadriceps tendon single-bundle, arthroscopic, anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with rectangular bone tunnels. Arthrosc Tech 7(10):1045–1056CrossRef Fink C, Lawton R, Förschner F, Gföller P, Herbort M, Hoser C (2018) Minimally invasive quadriceps tendon single-bundle, arthroscopic, anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with rectangular bone tunnels. Arthrosc Tech 7(10):1045–1056CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Barié A, Köpf M, Jaber A, Moradi B, Schmitt H, Huber J, Streich NA (2018) Long-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a press-fit quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):368CrossRef Barié A, Köpf M, Jaber A, Moradi B, Schmitt H, Huber J, Streich NA (2018) Long-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a press-fit quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):368CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee JK, Lee S, Lee MC (2016) Outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-quadriceps tendon graft versus double-bundle hamstring tendon graft. Am J Sports Med 44(9):2323–2329CrossRef Lee JK, Lee S, Lee MC (2016) Outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-quadriceps tendon graft versus double-bundle hamstring tendon graft. Am J Sports Med 44(9):2323–2329CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Slone HS, Romine SE, Premkumar A, Xerogeanes JW (2014) Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results. Arthroscopy 31(3):541–554CrossRef Slone HS, Romine SE, Premkumar A, Xerogeanes JW (2014) Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results. Arthroscopy 31(3):541–554CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Filbay SR (2014) Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 42(5):1247–1255CrossRef Filbay SR (2014) Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 42(5):1247–1255CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Notarnicola A, Maccagnano G, Barletta F, Ascatigno L, Astuto L, Panella A, Tafuri S, Moretti B (2016) Returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in amateur sports men: a retrospective study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 6(4):486–491PubMed Notarnicola A, Maccagnano G, Barletta F, Ascatigno L, Astuto L, Panella A, Tafuri S, Moretti B (2016) Returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in amateur sports men: a retrospective study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 6(4):486–491PubMed
Metadata
Title
In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after the ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block and bone–patellar tendon–bone graft
Authors
Martin Komzák
Radek Hart
David Náhlík
Robert Vysoký
Publication date
03-10-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04195-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2022 Go to the issue