Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Original Article

In vivo assessment of a novel biodegradable ureteral stent

Authors: Alexandre A. Barros, Carlos Oliveira, Ana J. Ribeiro, Riccardo Autorino, Rui L. Reis, Ana Rita C. Duarte, Estevão Lima

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To perform an in vivo assessment of a newly developed biodegradable ureteral stent (BUS) produced with natural-based polymers.

Methods

The BUS is based on a patented technology combining the injection process with the use of supercritical fluid technology. Study was conducted at ICVS—University of Minho (Braga, Portugal) and a total of ten domestic pigs were used. In seven animals, the experimental BUS stent was inserted, whereas in the remaining a commercially available stent was used (6-Fr Biosoft® duo stents, Porges Coloplast, Denmark). Post-stenting intravenous pyelogram was used to evaluate the degree of hydronephrosis. The in vivo stent degradation was measured as function of the weight loss. Moreover, the tensile properties of the BUS were tested during in vivo degradation. After maximum 10 days, animals were killed and necropsy was performed. Tissues were compared between the stented groups as well as between the non-stented contralateral ureters and stented ureters in each group. Biocompatibility was assessed by histopathological grading.

Results

In all cases, the BUS was only visible during the first 24 h on X-ray, and in all cases the BUS was completely degraded in urine after 10 days, as confirmed on necropsy. During the degradation process, the mechanical properties of the BUS decreased, while the commercial ureteral stents remained constant. At all time-points after stent insertion, the level of hydronephrosis was minimal. Overall, animals stented with BUS had an average grade of hydronephrosis which was lower compared to the controls. The BUS showed better pathological conditions, and hence better biocompatibility when compared with commercial stents.

Conclusions

Notwithstanding the limitations of the present study, the in vivo testing of our novel natural origin polymer-based BUS suggests this device to feature homogeneous degradation, good urine drainage, and high biocompatibility. Next steps will be to increase its stability, and to improve the radiopacity without compromising its degradation. Ultimately, clinical studies will be required to determine the safety and feasibility of its use in humans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito C et al (2002) Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int 69:136–140CrossRefPubMed Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito C et al (2002) Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int 69:136–140CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Singh V, Srinivastava A, Kapoor R et al (2005) Can the complicated forgotten indwelling ureteric stents be lethal? Int Urol Nephrol 37:541–546CrossRefPubMed Singh V, Srinivastava A, Kapoor R et al (2005) Can the complicated forgotten indwelling ureteric stents be lethal? Int Urol Nephrol 37:541–546CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Olweny EO, Landman J, Andreoni C et al (2002) Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model. J Urol 167:2198–2202CrossRefPubMed Olweny EO, Landman J, Andreoni C et al (2002) Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model. J Urol 167:2198–2202CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chew BH, Paterson RF, Clinkscales KW et al (2013) In vivo evaluation of the third generation biodegradable stent: a novel approach to avoiding the forgotten stent syndrome. J Urol 189:719–725CrossRefPubMed Chew BH, Paterson RF, Clinkscales KW et al (2013) In vivo evaluation of the third generation biodegradable stent: a novel approach to avoiding the forgotten stent syndrome. J Urol 189:719–725CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Barros AA, Rita A, Duarte C et al (2015) Bioresorbable ureteral stents from natural origin polymers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103(3):608–617CrossRefPubMed Barros AA, Rita A, Duarte C et al (2015) Bioresorbable ureteral stents from natural origin polymers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103(3):608–617CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chew BH, Knudsen BE, Nott L et al (2007) Pilot study of ureteral movement in stented patients: first step in understanding dynamic ureteral anatomy to improve stent comfort. J Endourol 21:1069–1075CrossRefPubMed Chew BH, Knudsen BE, Nott L et al (2007) Pilot study of ureteral movement in stented patients: first step in understanding dynamic ureteral anatomy to improve stent comfort. J Endourol 21:1069–1075CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barros AA, Oliveira C, Lima E et al (2016) Gelatin-based biodegradable ureteral stents with enhanced mechanical properties. Appl Mater Today 5:9–18CrossRef Barros AA, Oliveira C, Lima E et al (2016) Gelatin-based biodegradable ureteral stents with enhanced mechanical properties. Appl Mater Today 5:9–18CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schlick RW, Planz K (1997) Potentially useful materials for biodegradable ureteric stents. Br J Urol 1997(80):908–910CrossRef Schlick RW, Planz K (1997) Potentially useful materials for biodegradable ureteric stents. Br J Urol 1997(80):908–910CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zhang MQ, Zou T, Huang YC et al (2014) Braided thin-walled biodegradable ureteral stent: preliminary evaluation in a canine model. Int J Urol 21:401–407CrossRefPubMed Zhang MQ, Zou T, Huang YC et al (2014) Braided thin-walled biodegradable ureteral stent: preliminary evaluation in a canine model. Int J Urol 21:401–407CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hajdinjak T, Patel M, Papatsoris A, Masood J, Buchholz N, Birch M (2008) In vitro simulation of stent fracture mechanisms in ureteric nitinol wire stents. Urol Res 36(5):241–245CrossRefPubMed Hajdinjak T, Patel M, Papatsoris A, Masood J, Buchholz N, Birch M (2008) In vitro simulation of stent fracture mechanisms in ureteric nitinol wire stents. Urol Res 36(5):241–245CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M et al (2000) The indwelling ureteric stent: a ‘friendly’ procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int 85:408–411CrossRefPubMed Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M et al (2000) The indwelling ureteric stent: a ‘friendly’ procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int 85:408–411CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ramsay JWA, Payne SR, Gosling PT et al (1985) The Effects of Double-J Stenting on Unobstructed Ureters—an Experimental and Clinical-Study. Br J Urol 57:630–634CrossRefPubMed Ramsay JWA, Payne SR, Gosling PT et al (1985) The Effects of Double-J Stenting on Unobstructed Ureters—an Experimental and Clinical-Study. Br J Urol 57:630–634CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Young S, Wong M, Tabata Y, Mikos AG (2005) Gelatin as a delivery vehicle for the controlled release of bioactive molecules. J Control Release 5 109(1–3):256–274CrossRef Young S, Wong M, Tabata Y, Mikos AG (2005) Gelatin as a delivery vehicle for the controlled release of bioactive molecules. J Control Release 5 109(1–3):256–274CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Elwood CN, Lange D, Nadeau R et al (2010) Novel in vitro model for studying ureteric stent-induced cell injury. BJU Int 105:1318–1323CrossRefPubMed Elwood CN, Lange D, Nadeau R et al (2010) Novel in vitro model for studying ureteric stent-induced cell injury. BJU Int 105:1318–1323CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
In vivo assessment of a novel biodegradable ureteral stent
Authors
Alexandre A. Barros
Carlos Oliveira
Ana J. Ribeiro
Riccardo Autorino
Rui L. Reis
Ana Rita C. Duarte
Estevão Lima
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2124-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

World Journal of Urology 2/2018 Go to the issue