Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2010

01-05-2010 | Ankle

In vitro measurement of intraarticular pressure in the ankle joint

Authors: Andreas Suckel, Otto Muller, Nikolaus Wachter, Torsten Kluba

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Ankle joint affections and injuries are common problems in sports traumatology and in the daily routine of arthroscopic surgeons. However, there is little knowledge regarding intraarticular loads. Pressures on the ankle were determined in a dynamic model on 8 cadaver specimens, applying forces to tendons of the foot over the stance phase under vertical loading. A characteristic course of loading in the tibiotalar joint with a rapid increase upon heel contact was observed. It increased gradually to reach a maximum after 70% of the stance phase, during the push-off phase. The major torque in the ankle joint is located anterolaterally. A dynamic loading curve of the ankle joint can be demonstrated. These observations explain phenomena such as the appearance of osteophytes on the anterior tibia in the case of ankle osteoarthritis and the relatively low incidence of posterior tibial edge fragments in the case of trimalleolar ankle fracture. Furthermore, the medial side of the talus is less loaded compared to the lateral side, which appears relevant to the treatment of osteochondrosis dissecans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson DD, Goldsworthy JK, Shivanna K, Grosland NM, Pedersen DR, Thomas TP, Tochigi Y, Marsh JL, Brown TD (2006) Intra-articular contact stress distributions at the ankle throughout stance phase-patient-specific finite element analysis as a metric of degeneration propensity. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 5:82–89CrossRefPubMed Anderson DD, Goldsworthy JK, Shivanna K, Grosland NM, Pedersen DR, Thomas TP, Tochigi Y, Marsh JL, Brown TD (2006) Intra-articular contact stress distributions at the ankle throughout stance phase-patient-specific finite element analysis as a metric of degeneration propensity. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 5:82–89CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Calhoun JH, Li F, Ledbetter BR, Viegas SF (1994) A comprehensive study of pressure distribution in the ankle joint with inversion and eversion. Foot Ankle Int 15:125–133PubMed Calhoun JH, Li F, Ledbetter BR, Viegas SF (1994) A comprehensive study of pressure distribution in the ankle joint with inversion and eversion. Foot Ankle Int 15:125–133PubMed
3.
go back to reference Driscoll HL, Christensen JC, Tencer AF (1994) Contact characteristics of the ankle joint. Part 1. The normal joint. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 84:491–498PubMed Driscoll HL, Christensen JC, Tencer AF (1994) Contact characteristics of the ankle joint. Part 1. The normal joint. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 84:491–498PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hurschler C, Emmerich J, Wulker N (2003) In vitro simulation of stance phase gait part I: model verification. Foot Ankle Int 24:614–622PubMed Hurschler C, Emmerich J, Wulker N (2003) In vitro simulation of stance phase gait part I: model verification. Foot Ankle Int 24:614–622PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kimizuka M, Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T (1980) Load-bearing pattern of the ankle joint. Contact area and pressure distribution. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 96:45–49CrossRefPubMed Kimizuka M, Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T (1980) Load-bearing pattern of the ankle joint. Contact area and pressure distribution. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 96:45–49CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Martinelli L, Hurschler C, Rosenbaum D (2006) Comparison of capacitive versus resistive joint contact stress sensors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:214–220CrossRefPubMed Martinelli L, Hurschler C, Rosenbaum D (2006) Comparison of capacitive versus resistive joint contact stress sensors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:214–220CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Michelson JD, Checcone M, Kuhn T, Varner K (2001) Intra-articular load distribution in the human ankle joint during motion. Foot Ankle Int 22:226–233PubMed Michelson JD, Checcone M, Kuhn T, Varner K (2001) Intra-articular load distribution in the human ankle joint during motion. Foot Ankle Int 22:226–233PubMed
8.
go back to reference Muller-Gerbl M (2001) Anatomy and biomechanics of the ankle joint. Orthopaede 30:3–11CrossRef Muller-Gerbl M (2001) Anatomy and biomechanics of the ankle joint. Orthopaede 30:3–11CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nuber GW (1988) Biomechanics of the foot and ankle during gait. Clin Sports Med 7:1–13PubMed Nuber GW (1988) Biomechanics of the foot and ankle during gait. Clin Sports Med 7:1–13PubMed
11.
go back to reference Suckel A, Muller O, Herberts T, Wulker N (2007) Changes in Chopart joint load following tibiotalar arthrodesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:80CrossRefPubMed Suckel A, Muller O, Herberts T, Wulker N (2007) Changes in Chopart joint load following tibiotalar arthrodesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:80CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Suckel A, Muller O, Langenstein P, Herberts T, Wulker N (2008) Chopart’s joint load during gait. In vitro study of ten cadaver specimen in a dynamic model. Gait Posture 27:216–222CrossRefPubMed Suckel A, Muller O, Langenstein P, Herberts T, Wulker N (2008) Chopart’s joint load during gait. In vitro study of ten cadaver specimen in a dynamic model. Gait Posture 27:216–222CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:356–357PubMed Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:356–357PubMed
14.
go back to reference Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle. Part 2: Movement transfer. Foot Ankle Int 24:888–896PubMed Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle. Part 2: Movement transfer. Foot Ankle Int 24:888–896PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wan LB, de Asla RJ, Rubash HE, Li G (2006) Determination of in vivo articular cartilage contact areas of human talocrural joint under weightbearing conditions. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:1294–1301CrossRefPubMed Wan LB, de Asla RJ, Rubash HE, Li G (2006) Determination of in vivo articular cartilage contact areas of human talocrural joint under weightbearing conditions. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:1294–1301CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wu JZ, Herzog W, Epstein M (1998) Effects of inserting a pressensor film into articular joints on the actual contact mechanics. J Biomech Eng 120:655–659CrossRefPubMed Wu JZ, Herzog W, Epstein M (1998) Effects of inserting a pressensor film into articular joints on the actual contact mechanics. J Biomech Eng 120:655–659CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
In vitro measurement of intraarticular pressure in the ankle joint
Authors
Andreas Suckel
Otto Muller
Nikolaus Wachter
Torsten Kluba
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-1040-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2010 Go to the issue