Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Research

In vitro evaluation of an ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device

Authors: Shaun D. Gregory, Helena Cooney, Sara Diab, Chris Anstey, Ogilvie Thom, John F. Fraser

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring techniques provide high yield, low risk mechanisms to identify and individually treat shock in the emergency setting. The non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device uses an ultrasound probe applied externally to the chest; however limitations exist with previous validation strategies. This study presents the in vitro validation of the USCOM device against calibrated flow sensors and compares user variability in simulated healthy and septic conditions. A validated mock circulation loop was used to simulate each condition with a range of cardiac outputs (2–10 l/min) and heart rates (50–95 bpm). Three users with varying degrees of experience using the USCOM device measured cardiac output and heart rate by placing the ultrasound probe on the mock aorta. Users were blinded to the condition, heart rate and cardiac output which were randomly generated. Results were reported as linear regression slope (β). All users estimated heart rate in both conditions with reasonable accuracy (β = 0.86–1.01), while cardiac output in the sepsis condition was estimated with great precision (β = 1.03–1.04). Users generally overestimated the cardiac output in the healthy simulation (β = 1.07–1.26) and reported greater difficulty estimating reduced cardiac output compared with higher values. Although there was some variability between users, particularly in the healthy condition (P < 0.01), all estimations were within a clinically acceptable range. In this study the USCOM provided a suitable measurement of cardiac output and heart rate when compared with our in vitro system. It is a promising technique to assist with the identification and treatment of shock.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Drummond KE, Murphy E. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitors. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2011;12(1):5–10.CrossRef Drummond KE, Murphy E. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitors. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2011;12(1):5–10.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bernard S. The patient with shock: Is there any role for the non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output? Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:189–90.CrossRefPubMed Bernard S. The patient with shock: Is there any role for the non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output? Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:189–90.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Meyer S, Todd D, Wright I, Gortner L, Reynolds G. Review article: non-invasive assessment of cardiac output with portable continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound. Emerg Med Australas. 2008;20:201–8.CrossRefPubMed Meyer S, Todd D, Wright I, Gortner L, Reynolds G. Review article: non-invasive assessment of cardiac output with portable continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound. Emerg Med Australas. 2008;20:201–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77.CrossRefPubMed Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Marik PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;27(1):121–34.CrossRefPubMed Marik PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;27(1):121–34.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Broch O, et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients. Sci World J. 2013;2013:11.CrossRef Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Broch O, et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients. Sci World J. 2013;2013:11.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Corley A, Barnett AG, Mullany D, Fraser JF. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:1291–7.CrossRefPubMed Corley A, Barnett AG, Mullany D, Fraser JF. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:1291–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tan HL, Pinder M, Parsons R, Roberts B, van Heerden PV. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(3):287–91.CrossRefPubMed Tan HL, Pinder M, Parsons R, Roberts B, van Heerden PV. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(3):287–91.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Phillips R. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement. Crit Care Resusc. 2010;12(3):209–13.PubMed Phillips R. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement. Crit Care Resusc. 2010;12(3):209–13.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(3):748–53.CrossRefPubMed Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(3):748–53.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Thom O, Taylor DM, Wolfe RE, et al. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(6):800–4.CrossRefPubMed Thom O, Taylor DM, Wolfe RE, et al. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(6):800–4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference van Lelyveld-Haas LE, van Zanten AR, Borm GF, Tjan DH. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25:917–24.CrossRefPubMed van Lelyveld-Haas LE, van Zanten AR, Borm GF, Tjan DH. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25:917–24.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wong LSG, Yong BH, Young KK, et al. Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:1038–43.CrossRefPubMed Wong LSG, Yong BH, Young KK, et al. Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:1038–43.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lichtenthal PR, Phillips RA, Sloniger JA, Copeland JG. USCOM-non invasive Doppler—are cardiac output measurements accurate in both infants and adults? Anesthesiology. 2006;105:A466. Lichtenthal PR, Phillips RA, Sloniger JA, Copeland JG. USCOM-non invasive Doppler—are cardiac output measurements accurate in both infants and adults? Anesthesiology. 2006;105:A466.
16.
go back to reference Gregory SD, Greatrex N, Timms D, Gaddum N, Pearcy MJ, Fraser JF. Simulation and enhancement of a cardiovascular device test rig. J Simul. 2010;4:34–41.CrossRef Gregory SD, Greatrex N, Timms D, Gaddum N, Pearcy MJ, Fraser JF. Simulation and enhancement of a cardiovascular device test rig. J Simul. 2010;4:34–41.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Timms D, Gregory S, Greatrex N, Pearcy MJ, Fraser JF, Steinseifer U. A compact mock circulation loop for the in vitro testing of cardiovascular devices. Artif Organs. 2011;35(4):384–91.CrossRefPubMed Timms D, Gregory S, Greatrex N, Pearcy MJ, Fraser JF, Steinseifer U. A compact mock circulation loop for the in vitro testing of cardiovascular devices. Artif Organs. 2011;35(4):384–91.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gregory SD, Stevens M, Timms D, Pearcy M. Replication of the Frank-Starling response in a mock circulation loop. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS, Boston, USA; 2011. Gregory SD, Stevens M, Timms D, Pearcy M. Replication of the Frank-Starling response in a mock circulation loop. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS, Boston, USA; 2011.
19.
go back to reference Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients—a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–8.CrossRefPubMed Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients—a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, et al. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2483–95.CrossRefPubMed Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, et al. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2483–95.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Phillips RA, Hood SG, Jacobson BM, West MJ, Wan L, May CN. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) accuracy and efficacy compared with flow probe and transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): an ovine cardiac output validation. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012. doi:10.1155/2012/621496. Phillips RA, Hood SG, Jacobson BM, West MJ, Wan L, May CN. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) accuracy and efficacy compared with flow probe and transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): an ovine cardiac output validation. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012. doi:10.​1155/​2012/​621496.
22.
go back to reference Dark PM, Singer M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:2060–6.CrossRefPubMed Dark PM, Singer M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:2060–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Arora D, Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation after off-pump coronary artery bypass: a comparison of two different techniques. Ann Card Anaesth. 2007;10:132–6.CrossRefPubMed Arora D, Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation after off-pump coronary artery bypass: a comparison of two different techniques. Ann Card Anaesth. 2007;10:132–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006;20:315–9.CrossRefPubMed Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006;20:315–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Chong SW, Peyton PJ. A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Anaesthesia. 2012;67(11):1266–71.CrossRefPubMed Chong SW, Peyton PJ. A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Anaesthesia. 2012;67(11):1266–71.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chan JS, Segara D, Nair P. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study. Crit Care Resusc. 2006;8:309–14.PubMed Chan JS, Segara D, Nair P. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study. Crit Care Resusc. 2006;8:309–14.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Dey I, Sprivulis P. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:193–9.CrossRefPubMed Dey I, Sprivulis P. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:193–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Nguyen HB, Losey T, Rasmussen J, et al. Interrater reliability of cardiac output measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound: implications for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(7):828–35.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen HB, Losey T, Rasmussen J, et al. Interrater reliability of cardiac output measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound: implications for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(7):828–35.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Schnedlitz M. PVC phantoms for photoacoustic methods, In: Photoacoustic Institute, Karl-Franzens University Graz; 2011. p. 42. Schnedlitz M. PVC phantoms for photoacoustic methods, In: Photoacoustic Institute, Karl-Franzens University Graz; 2011. p. 42.
Metadata
Title
In vitro evaluation of an ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device
Authors
Shaun D. Gregory
Helena Cooney
Sara Diab
Chris Anstey
Ogilvie Thom
John F. Fraser
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9685-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1/2016 Go to the issue