Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

In Laparoscopic Myomectomy, Does a Caseload of 100 Patients During the Learning Curve Produce a Significant Improvement in Performance Measures?

Authors: Savan Shah, Jimi F. Odejinmi, Nilesh Agarwal

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Special Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) offers considerable advantages over open myomectomy; however, LM is technically complex and associated with a steep learning curve. Few studies have evaluated the effect of the learning curve, and the limitations of most of these studies were the number of women included and the multiplicity of surgeons undertaking the procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a caseload of 100 patients during the learning curve of a single experienced surgeon performing LM.

Methods

A prospective comparative analysis of 200 consecutive cases of LM was conducted between December 2004 and March 2013. Outcomes of the first 100 procedures (Group A) were compared with the later 100 (Group B).

Results

The mean age of the cohort was 39 years (24–54 years), with a mean BMI of 27 kg/m2 (16–46). Both the groups were very similar with regard to the number, size and weight of myomas removed, the duration of surgery, and blood loss. More women were sent home within 24 h in the second group (27 vs 10.2 %, p = 0.002). Group A suffered significantly higher complication rates compared to Group B (11 vs 7, p < 0.05). The laparotomy conversion rate was 1.5 % (3 in Group A, none in Group B).

Conclusions

After a caseload of 100 patients during the learning curve, there was no difference in outcomes apart from increased confidence to discharge patients after 24 h and reduced complication rates. Thus, mere numbers do not influence the number/size of fibroids removed, operating time, or blood loss but do influence complication rates and post-operative discharge times.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):100–7.CrossRefPubMed Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):100–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Marshall LM, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, et al. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(6):967–73.CrossRefPubMed Marshall LM, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, et al. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(6):967–73.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rosati P, Bellati U, Exacoustos C, et al. Uterine myoma in pregnancy: ultrasound study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989;28(2):109–17.CrossRefPubMed Rosati P, Bellati U, Exacoustos C, et al. Uterine myoma in pregnancy: ultrasound study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989;28(2):109–17.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hasan F, Arumugam K, Sivanesaratnam V. Uterine leiomyomata in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;34(1):45–8.CrossRefPubMed Hasan F, Arumugam K, Sivanesaratnam V. Uterine leiomyomata in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;34(1):45–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Verkauf BS. Changing trends in treatment of leiomyomata uteri. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;5(3):301–10.CrossRefPubMed Verkauf BS. Changing trends in treatment of leiomyomata uteri. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;5(3):301–10.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Garcia CR. Management of the symptomatic fibroid in women older than 40 years of age. Hysterectomy or myomectomy? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1993;20(2):337–48.PubMed Garcia CR. Management of the symptomatic fibroid in women older than 40 years of age. Hysterectomy or myomectomy? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1993;20(2):337–48.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Pundir J, Krishnan N, Siozos A, et al. Peri-operative morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167(2):219–24.CrossRefPubMed Pundir J, Krishnan N, Siozos A, et al. Peri-operative morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167(2):219–24.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(5):884–8.PubMed Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(5):884–8.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Dubuisson JB, Chapron C. Uterine fibroids: place and modalities of laparoscopic treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;65(1):91–4.CrossRefPubMed Dubuisson JB, Chapron C. Uterine fibroids: place and modalities of laparoscopic treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;65(1):91–4.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nezhat F, Seidman DS, Nezhat C, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy today. Why, when and for whom? Hum Reprod. 1996;11(5):933–4.CrossRefPubMed Nezhat F, Seidman DS, Nezhat C, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy today. Why, when and for whom? Hum Reprod. 1996;11(5):933–4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(2):654–8.CrossRefPubMed Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(2):654–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hurst BS, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(1):1–23.CrossRefPubMed Hurst BS, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(1):1–23.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jin C, Hu Y, Chen XC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145(1):14–21.CrossRefPubMed Jin C, Hu Y, Chen XC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145(1):14–21.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dubuisso JB, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(6):588–94.CrossRefPubMed Dubuisso JB, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(6):588–94.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Song SJ, Kim CH, Kim SH, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic myomectomy. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46(12):2345–51. Song SJ, Kim CH, Kim SH, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic myomectomy. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46(12):2345–51.
18.
go back to reference Sankaran S, Odejinmi F. Prospective evaluation of 125 consecutive laparoscopic myomectomies. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(6):609–12.CrossRefPubMed Sankaran S, Odejinmi F. Prospective evaluation of 125 consecutive laparoscopic myomectomies. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(6):609–12.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Landi S, Zaccoletti R, Ferrari L, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: technique, complications, and ultrasound scan evaluations. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8(2):231–40.CrossRefPubMed Landi S, Zaccoletti R, Ferrari L, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: technique, complications, and ultrasound scan evaluations. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8(2):231–40.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rossetti A, Sizzi O, Chiarotti F, et al. Developments in techniques for laparoscopic myomectomy. JSLS. 2007;11(1):34–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Rossetti A, Sizzi O, Chiarotti F, et al. Developments in techniques for laparoscopic myomectomy. JSLS. 2007;11(1):34–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Pandey V, Wolfe JH, Moorthy K, et al. Technical skills continue to improve beyond surgical training. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(3):539–45.CrossRefPubMed Pandey V, Wolfe JH, Moorthy K, et al. Technical skills continue to improve beyond surgical training. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(3):539–45.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Marret H, Chevillot M, Giraudeau B. Study Group of the French Society of G, Obstetrics. Factors influencing laparoconversions during the learning curve of laparoscopic myomectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(3):324–9.CrossRefPubMed Marret H, Chevillot M, Giraudeau B. Study Group of the French Society of G, Obstetrics. Factors influencing laparoconversions during the learning curve of laparoscopic myomectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(3):324–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Glasser MH. Minilaparotomy myomectomy: a minimally invasive alternative for the large fibroid uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(3):275–83.CrossRefPubMed Glasser MH. Minilaparotomy myomectomy: a minimally invasive alternative for the large fibroid uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(3):275–83.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kimball BP, Bui S, Cohen EA, et al. Early experience with directional coronary atherectomy: documentation of the learning curve. Can J Cardiol. 1993;9(2):177–85.PubMed Kimball BP, Bui S, Cohen EA, et al. Early experience with directional coronary atherectomy: documentation of the learning curve. Can J Cardiol. 1993;9(2):177–85.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Prakash K, Kamalesh NP, Pramil K, et al. Does case selection and outcome following laparoscopic colorectal resection change after initial learning curve? Analysis of 235 consecutive elective laparoscopic colorectal resections. J Minimal Access Surg. 2013;9(3):99–103.CrossRef Prakash K, Kamalesh NP, Pramil K, et al. Does case selection and outcome following laparoscopic colorectal resection change after initial learning curve? Analysis of 235 consecutive elective laparoscopic colorectal resections. J Minimal Access Surg. 2013;9(3):99–103.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
In Laparoscopic Myomectomy, Does a Caseload of 100 Patients During the Learning Curve Produce a Significant Improvement in Performance Measures?
Authors
Savan Shah
Jimi F. Odejinmi
Nilesh Agarwal
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue Special Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0782-x

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016 Go to the issue