Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2011

01-07-2011

In-hospital Delay Increases the Risk of Perforation in Adults with Appendicitis

Authors: Mirjam Busch, Florian S. Gutzwiller, Sonja Aellig, Rolf Kuettel, Urs Metzger, Urs Zingg

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The influence of in-hospital delay (time between admission and operation) on outcome after appendectomy is controversial.

Methods

A total of 1,827 adult patients underwent open or laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected appendicitis in eleven Swiss hospitals between 2003 and 2006. Of these, 1,675 patients with confirmed appendicitis were included in the study. Groups were defined according in-hospital delay (≤12 vs. >12 h).

Results

Delay > 12 h was associated with a significantly higher frequency of perforated appendicitis (29.7 vs. 22.7%; P = 0.010) whereas a delay of 6 or 9 h was not. Size of institution, time of admission, and surgical technique (laparoscopic vs. open) were independent factors influencing in-hospital delay. Admission during regular hours was associated with higher age, higher frequency of co-morbidity, and higher perforation rate compared to admission after hours. The logistic regression identified four independent factors associated with an increased perforation rate: age (≤65 years vs. >65 years, odds ratio (OR) 4.5, P < 0.001); co-morbidity (Charlson index > 0 vs. Charlson index = 0, OR 2.3, P < 0.001); time of admission (after hours vs. regular hours, OR 0.8, P = 0.040), in-hospital delay (>12 vs. ≤12 h, OR 1.5, P = 0.005). Perforation was associated with an increased reintervention rate (13.4 vs. 1.6%; P < 0.001) and longer length of hospital stay (9.5 vs. 4.4 days; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In-hospital delay negatively influences outcome after appendectomy. In-hospital delay of more than 12 h, age over 65 years, time of admission during regular hours, and the presence of co-morbidity are all independent risk factors for perforation. Perforation was associated with a higher reintervention rate and increased length of hospital stay.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kearney D, Cahill RA, O’Brien E et al (2008) Influence of delays on perforation risk in adults with acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1823–1827PubMedCrossRef Kearney D, Cahill RA, O’Brien E et al (2008) Influence of delays on perforation risk in adults with acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1823–1827PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference SCOAP Collaborative, Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 248:557–563PubMed SCOAP Collaborative, Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 248:557–563PubMed
3.
go back to reference Hale DA, Jaques DP, Molloy M et al (1997) Appendectomy. Improving care through quality improvement. Arch Surg 132:153–157PubMed Hale DA, Jaques DP, Molloy M et al (1997) Appendectomy. Improving care through quality improvement. Arch Surg 132:153–157PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sleem R, Fisher S, Gestring M et al (2009) Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? Surgery 146:731–737PubMedCrossRef Sleem R, Fisher S, Gestring M et al (2009) Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? Surgery 146:731–737PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM et al (2000) Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies. Am Surg 66:548–554PubMed Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM et al (2000) Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies. Am Surg 66:548–554PubMed
6.
go back to reference Colson M, Skinner KA, Dunnington G (1997) High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. Am J Surg 174:723–726PubMedCrossRef Colson M, Skinner KA, Dunnington G (1997) High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. Am J Surg 174:723–726PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Eldar S, Nash E, Sabo E et al (1997) Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 173:194–198PubMedCrossRef Eldar S, Nash E, Sabo E et al (1997) Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 173:194–198PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281PubMedCrossRef Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fahim F, Shirjeel S (2005) A comparison between presentation time and delay in surgery in simple and advanced appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 17:37–39PubMed Fahim F, Shirjeel S (2005) A comparison between presentation time and delay in surgery in simple and advanced appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 17:37–39PubMed
10.
go back to reference Maroju NK, Robinson Smile S, Sistla SC et al (2004) Delay in surgery for acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 74:773–776PubMedCrossRef Maroju NK, Robinson Smile S, Sistla SC et al (2004) Delay in surgery for acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 74:773–776PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW (1996) Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am J Emerg Med 14:620–622CrossRef Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW (1996) Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am J Emerg Med 14:620–622CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Omundsen M, Dennett E (2006) Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg 76:153–155PubMedCrossRef Omundsen M, Dennett E (2006) Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg 76:153–155PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hardin DM Jr (1999) Acute appendicitis: review and update. Am Fam Physician 60:2027–2034PubMed Hardin DM Jr (1999) Acute appendicitis: review and update. Am Fam Physician 60:2027–2034PubMed
14.
go back to reference Preston CA, Karch SB (1989) The influence of gender and use of barium enema on morbidity in acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 7:253–255PubMedCrossRef Preston CA, Karch SB (1989) The influence of gender and use of barium enema on morbidity in acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 7:253–255PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Antevil J, Rivera L, Langenberg B et al (2004) The influence of age and gender on the utility of computed tomography to diagnose acute appendicitis. Am Surg 70:850–853PubMed Antevil J, Rivera L, Langenberg B et al (2004) The influence of age and gender on the utility of computed tomography to diagnose acute appendicitis. Am Surg 70:850–853PubMed
16.
go back to reference Agafonoff S, Hawke I, Khadra M et al (1987) The influence of age and gender on normal appendicectomy rates. ANZ J Surg 57:843–846CrossRef Agafonoff S, Hawke I, Khadra M et al (1987) The influence of age and gender on normal appendicectomy rates. ANZ J Surg 57:843–846CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Franz MG, Norman J, Fabri PJ (1995) Increased morbidity of appendicitis with advancing age. Am Surg 61:40–44PubMed Franz MG, Norman J, Fabri PJ (1995) Increased morbidity of appendicitis with advancing age. Am Surg 61:40–44PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lunca S, Bouras G, Romedea NS (2004) Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors and outcomes. Rom J Gastroenterol 13:299–303PubMed Lunca S, Bouras G, Romedea NS (2004) Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors and outcomes. Rom J Gastroenterol 13:299–303PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hansson LE, Laurell H, Gunnarson U (2008) Impact of time in the development of acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 25:394–399PubMedCrossRef Hansson LE, Laurell H, Gunnarson U (2008) Impact of time in the development of acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 25:394–399PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Abou-Nukta F, Bakhos C, Arroyo K et al (2006) Effects of delaying appendicectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours. Arch Surg 141:504–507PubMedCrossRef Abou-Nukta F, Bakhos C, Arroyo K et al (2006) Effects of delaying appendicectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours. Arch Surg 141:504–507PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bickell N, Aufses AH, Rojas M et al (2006) How time affects the risk of rupture in acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 202:401–406PubMedCrossRef Bickell N, Aufses AH, Rojas M et al (2006) How time affects the risk of rupture in acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 202:401–406PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chung CH, Ng CP, Lai KK (2000) Delays by patients, emergency physicians, and surgeons in the management of acute appendicitis: retrospective study. Hong Kong Med J 6:254–259PubMed Chung CH, Ng CP, Lai KK (2000) Delays by patients, emergency physicians, and surgeons in the management of acute appendicitis: retrospective study. Hong Kong Med J 6:254–259PubMed
23.
go back to reference Papaziogas B, Tsiaousis P, Koutelidakis I et al (2009) Effect of time on risk of perforation in acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Belg 109:75–80PubMed Papaziogas B, Tsiaousis P, Koutelidakis I et al (2009) Effect of time on risk of perforation in acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Belg 109:75–80PubMed
24.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic co-morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic co-morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R (2006) Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 244:656–660PubMedCrossRef Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R (2006) Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 244:656–660PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Burns RP, Cochran JL, Russell WL et al (1985) Appendicitis in mature patients. Ann Surg 201:695–704PubMedCrossRef Burns RP, Cochran JL, Russell WL et al (1985) Appendicitis in mature patients. Ann Surg 201:695–704PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0056-y PubMedCrossRef Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-006-0056-y PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cullinane M, Gray AJG, Hargraves CMK et al (2003) The 2003 report of the national confidential inquiry into perioperative deaths, pp 1–128. www.ncepod.org.uk. Accessed April 2011 Cullinane M, Gray AJG, Hargraves CMK et al (2003) The 2003 report of the national confidential inquiry into perioperative deaths, pp 1–128. www.​ncepod.​org.​uk. Accessed April 2011
29.
go back to reference Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ et al (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829PubMedCrossRef Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ et al (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
In-hospital Delay Increases the Risk of Perforation in Adults with Appendicitis
Authors
Mirjam Busch
Florian S. Gutzwiller
Sonja Aellig
Rolf Kuettel
Urs Metzger
Urs Zingg
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1101-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

World Journal of Surgery 7/2011 Go to the issue