Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Original Article

Improved diagnostic confidence and accuracy of pediatric elbow fractures with digital tomosynthesis

Authors: Matthew A. Zapala, Kristin Livingston, Danial Bokhari, Andrew S. Phelps, Jesse L. Courtier, Collin Ma, Youngho Seo, John D. MacKenzie

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pediatric elbow fractures are common but remain challenging to accurately diagnose. Digital tomosynthesis is a technique that has shown promise in difficult adult fracture patterns but has not been formally studied in the pediatric population.

Objective

To assess the added value of digital tomosynthesis on the detection and diagnostic confidence of pediatric elbow fractures.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was performed between January 2016 and December 2017 in pediatric patients (≤18 years) to assess the ability of conventional elbow radiographs and digital tomosynthesis to detect elbow fractures. One hundred twenty-one pediatric patients with concern for pediatric elbow trauma (64 males, 57 females; mean age: 8.1 years, range: 1 year to 17 years) were imaged with both conventional elbow radiographs and digital tomosynthesis. Two blinded pediatric radiologists identified fractures and indicated their diagnostic confidence. Observer agreement was assessed with Cohen’s Kappa coefficient and a nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the degree of diagnostic confidence between standard radiographs alone and standard radiographs with digital tomosynthesis. McNemar’s test was used to assess the difference in the rate of fracture detection between the two methods and sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated.

Results

Compared with standard radiographs alone, standard radiographs with digital tomosynthesis improved inter-rater agreement, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision and the diagnostic odds ratio for fracture detection and increased diagnostic confidence (Rater 1: P=0.01, Rater 2: P=0.003).

Conclusion

The addition of digital tomosynthesis with conventional elbow radiographs improves diagnostic confidence and performance for the detection of pediatric elbow fractures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Iyer RS, Thapa MM, Khanna PC, Chew FS (2012) Pediatric bone imaging: imaging elbow trauma in children—a review of acute and chronic injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1053–1068CrossRef Iyer RS, Thapa MM, Khanna PC, Chew FS (2012) Pediatric bone imaging: imaging elbow trauma in children—a review of acute and chronic injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1053–1068CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Landin LA (1983) Fracture patterns in children. Analysis of 8,682 fractures with special reference to incidence, etiology and secular changes in a Swedish urban population 1950-1979. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 202:100–109 Landin LA (1983) Fracture patterns in children. Analysis of 8,682 fractures with special reference to incidence, etiology and secular changes in a Swedish urban population 1950-1979. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 202:100–109
3.
go back to reference Emery KH, Zingula SN, Anton CG et al (2016) Pediatric elbow fractures: a new angle on an old topic. Pediatr Radiol 46:61–66CrossRef Emery KH, Zingula SN, Anton CG et al (2016) Pediatric elbow fractures: a new angle on an old topic. Pediatr Radiol 46:61–66CrossRef
4.
go back to reference DeFroda SF, Hansen H, Gil JA et al (2017) Radiographic evaluation of common pediatric elbow injuries. Orthop Rev 9:7030CrossRef DeFroda SF, Hansen H, Gil JA et al (2017) Radiographic evaluation of common pediatric elbow injuries. Orthop Rev 9:7030CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cheng JC, Wing-Man K, Shen WY et al (1998) A new look at the sequential development of elbow ossification centers in children. J Pediatr Orthop 18:161–167PubMed Cheng JC, Wing-Man K, Shen WY et al (1998) A new look at the sequential development of elbow ossification centers in children. J Pediatr Orthop 18:161–167PubMed
6.
go back to reference Patel B, Reed M, Patel S (2009) Gender-specific pattern differences of the ossification centers in the pediatric elbow. Pediatr Radiol 39:226–231CrossRef Patel B, Reed M, Patel S (2009) Gender-specific pattern differences of the ossification centers in the pediatric elbow. Pediatr Radiol 39:226–231CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Donnelly LF, Klostermeier TT, Klosterman LA (1998) Traumatic elbow effusions in pediatric patients: are occult fractures the rule? AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:243–245CrossRef Donnelly LF, Klostermeier TT, Klosterman LA (1998) Traumatic elbow effusions in pediatric patients: are occult fractures the rule? AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:243–245CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Skaggs DL, Mirzayan R (1999) The posterior fat pad sign in association with occult fracture of the elbow in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1429–1433CrossRef Skaggs DL, Mirzayan R (1999) The posterior fat pad sign in association with occult fracture of the elbow in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1429–1433CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Major NM, Crawford ST (2002) Elbow effusions in trauma in adults and children: is there an occult fracture? AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:413–418CrossRef Major NM, Crawford ST (2002) Elbow effusions in trauma in adults and children: is there an occult fracture? AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:413–418CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Al-Aubaidi Z, Torfing T (2012) The role of fat pad sign in diagnosing occult elbow fractures in the pediatric patient: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. J Pediatr Orthop B 21:514–519CrossRef Al-Aubaidi Z, Torfing T (2012) The role of fat pad sign in diagnosing occult elbow fractures in the pediatric patient: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. J Pediatr Orthop B 21:514–519CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lins RE, Simovitch RW, Waters PM (1999) Pediatric elbow trauma. Orthop Clin North Am 30:119–132CrossRef Lins RE, Simovitch RW, Waters PM (1999) Pediatric elbow trauma. Orthop Clin North Am 30:119–132CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dobbins JT 3rd, Godfrey DJ (2003) Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 48:R65–106CrossRef Dobbins JT 3rd, Godfrey DJ (2003) Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 48:R65–106CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Compton N, Murphy L, Lyons F et al (2018) Tomosynthesis: a new radiologic technique for rapid diagnosis of scaphoid fractures. Surgeon 16:131–136CrossRef Compton N, Murphy L, Lyons F et al (2018) Tomosynthesis: a new radiologic technique for rapid diagnosis of scaphoid fractures. Surgeon 16:131–136CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ottenin MA, Jacquot A, Grospretre O et al (2012) Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis in fractures of the wrist. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:180–186CrossRef Ottenin MA, Jacquot A, Grospretre O et al (2012) Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis in fractures of the wrist. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:180–186CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Geijer M, Börjesson AM, Göthlin JH (2011) Clinical utility of tomosynthesis in suspected scaphoid fracture. A pilot study. Skelet Radiol 40:863–867CrossRef Geijer M, Börjesson AM, Göthlin JH (2011) Clinical utility of tomosynthesis in suspected scaphoid fracture. A pilot study. Skelet Radiol 40:863–867CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nelson F, Bokhari O, Oravec D et al (2017) The use of tomosynthesis in the global study of knee subchondral insufficiency fractures. Acad Radiol 24:175–183CrossRef Nelson F, Bokhari O, Oravec D et al (2017) The use of tomosynthesis in the global study of knee subchondral insufficiency fractures. Acad Radiol 24:175–183CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ha AS, Lee AY, Hippe DS et al (2015) Digital tomosynthesis to evaluate fracture healing: prospective comparison with radiography and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:136–141CrossRef Ha AS, Lee AY, Hippe DS et al (2015) Digital tomosynthesis to evaluate fracture healing: prospective comparison with radiography and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:136–141CrossRef
18.
go back to reference De Silvestro A, Martini K, Becker AS et al (2018) Postoperative imaging of orthopaedic hardware in the hand and wrist: is there an added value for tomosynthesis? Clin Radiol 73:214.e1–214.e9CrossRef De Silvestro A, Martini K, Becker AS et al (2018) Postoperative imaging of orthopaedic hardware in the hand and wrist: is there an added value for tomosynthesis? Clin Radiol 73:214.e1–214.e9CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gislason A, Elbakri IA, Reed M (2009) Dose assessment of digital tomosynthesis in pediatric imaging. Proc SPIE 7258 Gislason A, Elbakri IA, Reed M (2009) Dose assessment of digital tomosynthesis in pediatric imaging. Proc SPIE 7258
20.
go back to reference Zapala MA, Livingston K, Phelps AS, MacKenzie JD (2019) Digital tomosynthesis of the pediatric elbow. Pediatr Radiol 49:1643–1651CrossRef Zapala MA, Livingston K, Phelps AS, MacKenzie JD (2019) Digital tomosynthesis of the pediatric elbow. Pediatr Radiol 49:1643–1651CrossRef
21.
go back to reference MacKenzie JD, Nazario-Larrieu J, Cai T et al (2007) Reduced-dose CT: effect on reader evaluation in detection of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1371–1379CrossRef MacKenzie JD, Nazario-Larrieu J, Cai T et al (2007) Reduced-dose CT: effect on reader evaluation in detection of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1371–1379CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pepe MS (2004) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford University Press, Oxford Pepe MS (2004) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford University Press, Oxford
24.
go back to reference Fagerland MW, Lydersen S, Laake P (2013) The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:91CrossRef Fagerland MW, Lydersen S, Laake P (2013) The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:91CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kim S, Lee W (2017) Does McNemar's test compare the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic tests? Stat Methods Med Res 26:142–154CrossRef Kim S, Lee W (2017) Does McNemar's test compare the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic tests? Stat Methods Med Res 26:142–154CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH et al (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129–1135CrossRef Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH et al (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129–1135CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Noël A, Ottenin MA, Germain C et al (2011) Comparison of irradiation for tomosynthesis and CT of the wrist. J Radiol 92:32–39CrossRef Noël A, Ottenin MA, Germain C et al (2011) Comparison of irradiation for tomosynthesis and CT of the wrist. J Radiol 92:32–39CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improved diagnostic confidence and accuracy of pediatric elbow fractures with digital tomosynthesis
Authors
Matthew A. Zapala
Kristin Livingston
Danial Bokhari
Andrew S. Phelps
Jesse L. Courtier
Collin Ma
Youngho Seo
John D. MacKenzie
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04548-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Pediatric Radiology 3/2020 Go to the issue