Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Improved anchoring nails: design and analysis of resistance ability

Tensile test and finite element analysis (FEA) of improved anchoring nails used in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc anchor

Authors: Z. H. Zhou, X. Z. Chen, X. W. Chen, Y. X. Wang, S. Y. Zhang, S. F. Sun, J. Z. Zhen

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Anchorage is one of the most important treatments for severe temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD). Anchoring nails have shown great success in clinical trials; however, they can break under pressure and are difficult to remove. In this study, we aimed to evaluate an improved anchoring nail and its mechanical stability.

Methods

The experiment consisted of two parts: a tensile test and finite element analysis (FEA). First, traditional and improved anchoring nails were implanted into the condylar cortical bone and their tensile strength was measured using a tension meter. Second, a three-dimensional finite element model of the condyles with implants was established and FEA was performed with forces from three different directions.

Results

The FEA results showed that the total force of the traditional and improved anchoring nails is 48.2 N and 200 N, respectively. The mean (±s.d.) maximum tensile strength of the traditional anchoring nail with a 3–0 suture was 27.53 ± 5.47 N. For the improved anchoring nail with a 3–0 suture it was 25.89 ± 2.64 N and with a 2–0 suture it was above 50 N. The tensile strengths of the traditional and improved anchoring nails with a 3–0 suture was significantly different (P = 0.033–< 0.05). Furthermore, the difference between the traditional anchoring nail with a 3–0 suture and the improved anchoring nail with a 2–0 suture was also significantly different (P = 0.000–< 0.01).

Conclusion

The improved anchoring nail, especially when combined with a 2–0 suture, showed better resistance ability compared with the traditional anchoring nail.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schiffman EL, Friction JR, Haley DP, Shapiro BL. The prevalence and treatment needs of subjects with temporomandibular disorders. Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120:295–303.CrossRef Schiffman EL, Friction JR, Haley DP, Shapiro BL. The prevalence and treatment needs of subjects with temporomandibular disorders. Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120:295–303.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dionne RA. Pharmacologic treatments for temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:134–42.CrossRefPubMed Dionne RA. Pharmacologic treatments for temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:134–42.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Okeson JP, Moody PM, Kemper JT, et al. Evaluation of occlusal splint therapy. J cranio-mandibular Pract. 1983;1:47.CrossRef Okeson JP, Moody PM, Kemper JT, et al. Evaluation of occlusal splint therapy. J cranio-mandibular Pract. 1983;1:47.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dominique Royle M. TMJ disorders – management of the craniomandibular complex. Physiotherapy 1988, 74:590–590. Dominique Royle M. TMJ disorders – management of the craniomandibular complex. Physiotherapy 1988, 74:590–590.
5.
go back to reference Mercuri LG, Giobbie-Hurder A. Long-term outcomes after total alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction following exposure to failed materials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1088–96.CrossRefPubMed Mercuri LG, Giobbie-Hurder A. Long-term outcomes after total alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction following exposure to failed materials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1088–96.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wilkes CH. Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Pathological variations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(115):469–77.CrossRefPubMed Wilkes CH. Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Pathological variations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(115):469–77.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhang S, Liu X, Yang X, et al. Temporomandibular joint disc repositioning using bone anchors: an immediate post surgical evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:262.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang S, Liu X, Yang X, et al. Temporomandibular joint disc repositioning using bone anchors: an immediate post surgical evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:262.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kerstens HC, Tuinzing DB, Wa VDK. Eminectomy and discoplasty for correction of the displaced temporomandibular joint disc. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:150–2.CrossRefPubMed Kerstens HC, Tuinzing DB, Wa VDK. Eminectomy and discoplasty for correction of the displaced temporomandibular joint disc. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:150–2.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mehra P, Wolford LM. Use of the MITEK anchor in temporomandibular joint disc-repositioning surgery. Proceedings. 2001;14:22. Mehra P, Wolford LM. Use of the MITEK anchor in temporomandibular joint disc-repositioning surgery. Proceedings. 2001;14:22.
10.
go back to reference Spallaccia F, Rivaroli A, Basile E, et al. Disk repositioning surgery of the temporomandibular joint with bioabsorbable anchor. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:1792–5.CrossRefPubMed Spallaccia F, Rivaroli A, Basile E, et al. Disk repositioning surgery of the temporomandibular joint with bioabsorbable anchor. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:1792–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference He D, Yang C, Zhang S, et al. Modified Temporomandibular Joint Disc Repositioning With Miniscrew Anchor: Part I—Surgical Technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(1):47.e1–9.CrossRef He D, Yang C, Zhang S, et al. Modified Temporomandibular Joint Disc Repositioning With Miniscrew Anchor: Part I—Surgical Technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(1):47.e1–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Li H, Sun S, Fan B, Shen P, Zheng J, Zhang S. Prevention of adhesions in the temporomandibular joint by the use of chitosan membrane in goats ☆. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(1):26–30.CrossRefPubMed Li H, Sun S, Fan B, Shen P, Zheng J, Zhang S. Prevention of adhesions in the temporomandibular joint by the use of chitosan membrane in goats ☆. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(1):26–30.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Roarth CM, Grosland NM. Adaptive meshing technique applied to an orthopaedic finite element contact problem. Iowa Orthop J. 2004;24:21–9. Roarth CM, Grosland NM. Adaptive meshing technique applied to an orthopaedic finite element contact problem. Iowa Orthop J. 2004;24:21–9.
15.
go back to reference Tanaka E, Van ET. Biomechanical behavior of the temporomandibular joint disc. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14:138–50.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka E, Van ET. Biomechanical behavior of the temporomandibular joint disc. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14:138–50.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. Combined finite-element and rigid-body analysis of human jaw joint dynamics. J Biomech. 2005;38:2431–9.CrossRefPubMed Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. Combined finite-element and rigid-body analysis of human jaw joint dynamics. J Biomech. 2005;38:2431–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Liu Z, Fan Y, Qian Y. Comparative evaluation on three-dimensional finite element models of the temporomandibular joint. Clin Biomech. 2008;23:S53.CrossRef Liu Z, Fan Y, Qian Y. Comparative evaluation on three-dimensional finite element models of the temporomandibular joint. Clin Biomech. 2008;23:S53.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barnes SJ, Coleman SG, Gilpin D. Repair of avulsed insertion of biceps. A new technique in four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:938.CrossRefPubMed Barnes SJ, Coleman SG, Gilpin D. Repair of avulsed insertion of biceps. A new technique in four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:938.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Farrall LA. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs using suture anchors. AORN J. 1995;62:737–50.CrossRef Farrall LA. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs using suture anchors. AORN J. 1995;62:737–50.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improved anchoring nails: design and analysis of resistance ability
Tensile test and finite element analysis (FEA) of improved anchoring nails used in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc anchor
Authors
Z. H. Zhou
X. Z. Chen
X. W. Chen
Y. X. Wang
S. Y. Zhang
S. F. Sun
J. Z. Zhen
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0606-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Oral Health 1/2018 Go to the issue