Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Important factors for effective patient safety governance auditing: a questionnaire survey

Authors: Saskia C. van Gelderen, Marieke Zegers, Paul B. Robben, Wilma Boeijen, Gert P. Westert, Hub C. Wollersheim

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Audits are increasingly used for patient safety governance purposes. However, there is little insight into the factors that hinder or stimulate effective governance based on auditing. The aim of this study is to quantify the factors that influence effective auditing for hospital boards and executives.

Methods

A questionnaire of 32 factors was developed using influencing factors found in a qualitative study on effective auditing. Factors were divided into four categories. The questionnaire was sent to the board of directors, chief of medical staff, nursing officer, medical department head and director of the quality and safety department of 89 acute care hospitals in the Netherlands.

Results

We approached 522 people, of whom 211 responded. Of the 32 factors in the questionnaire, 30 factors had an agreement percentage higher than 50%. Important factors per category were ‘audit as an improvement tool as well as a control tool’, ‘department is aware of audit purpose’, ‘quality of auditors’ and ‘learning culture at department’. We found 14 factors with a significant difference in agreement between stakeholders of at least 20%. Amongst these were ‘medical specialist on the audit team’, ‘soft signals in the audit report’, ‘patients as auditors’ and ‘post-audit support’.

Conclusion

We found 30 factors for effective auditing, which we synthesised into eight recommendations to optimise audits. Hospitals can use these recommendations as a framework for audits that enable boards to become more in control of patient safety in their hospital.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shaw C, Kutryba B, Crisp H, Vallejo P, Suñol R. Do European hospitals have quality and safety governance systems and structures in place? Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(Suppl 1):i51–6.CrossRef Shaw C, Kutryba B, Crisp H, Vallejo P, Suñol R. Do European hospitals have quality and safety governance systems and structures in place? Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(Suppl 1):i51–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goeschel CA, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ. Responsibility for quality improvement and patient safety: hospital board and medical staff leadership challenges. Chest. 2010;138(1):171–8.CrossRef Goeschel CA, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ. Responsibility for quality improvement and patient safety: hospital board and medical staff leadership challenges. Chest. 2010;138(1):171–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Levey S, Vaughn T, Koepke M, Moore D, Lehrman W, Sinha S. Hospital leadership and quality improvement: rhetoric versus reality. J Patient Saf. 2007;3(1):9–15.CrossRef Levey S, Vaughn T, Koepke M, Moore D, Lehrman W, Sinha S. Hospital leadership and quality improvement: rhetoric versus reality. J Patient Saf. 2007;3(1):9–15.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bolsin SN. Professional misconduct: the Bristol case. Med J Aust. 1998;169(7):369–72.PubMed Bolsin SN. Professional misconduct: the Bristol case. Med J Aust. 1998;169(7):369–72.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Een tekortschietend zorgproces cardiochirurgische keten UMC St. Radboud. 2006. Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Een tekortschietend zorgproces cardiochirurgische keten UMC St. Radboud. 2006.
6.
go back to reference Berwick D. A promise to learn–a commitment to act: improving the safety of patients in England. London: Department of Health; 2013. Berwick D. A promise to learn–a commitment to act: improving the safety of patients in England. London: Department of Health; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Francis R. Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust public inquiry: executive summary. London: 947 The stationery Office; 2013. Francis R. Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust public inquiry: executive summary. London: 947 The stationery Office; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Parand A, Dopson S, Renz A, Vincent C. The role of hospital managers in quality and patient safety: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):1–15.CrossRef Parand A, Dopson S, Renz A, Vincent C. The role of hospital managers in quality and patient safety: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):1–15.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vincent C, Burnett S, Carthey J. Safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a framework to guide clinical teams and healthcare organisations in maintaining safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(8):670–7.CrossRef Vincent C, Burnett S, Carthey J. Safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a framework to guide clinical teams and healthcare organisations in maintaining safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(8):670–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hanskamp-Sebregts M, Zegers M, Boeijen W, Westert GP, van Gurp PJ, Wollersheim H. Effects of auditing patient safety in hospital care: design of a mixed-method evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13(1):226. Hanskamp-Sebregts M, Zegers M, Boeijen W, Westert GP, van Gurp PJ, Wollersheim H. Effects of auditing patient safety in hospital care: design of a mixed-method evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13(1):226.
11.
go back to reference Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, O’Brien MA, French SD, Young J, Odgaard-Jensen J. Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(11):1534–41.CrossRef Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, O’Brien MA, French SD, Young J, Odgaard-Jensen J. Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(11):1534–41.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O’Brien MA, Oxman AD. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(6):433–6.CrossRef Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O’Brien MA, Oxman AD. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(6):433–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van Gelderen SC, Hesselink G, Westert G, Robben PB, Boeijen W, Zegers M, Wollersheim H. Optimal governance of patient safety: a qualitative study on barriers to and facilitators for effective auditing. Journal of Hospital Administration. 2017;6(3):15–25.CrossRef Van Gelderen SC, Hesselink G, Westert G, Robben PB, Boeijen W, Zegers M, Wollersheim H. Optimal governance of patient safety: a qualitative study on barriers to and facilitators for effective auditing. Journal of Hospital Administration. 2017;6(3):15–25.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Johnston G, Crombie I, Davies H, Alder E, Millard A. Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitation factors for effective clinical audit. Qual Health Care. 2000;9(1):23–36.CrossRef Johnston G, Crombie I, Davies H, Alder E, Millard A. Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitation factors for effective clinical audit. Qual Health Care. 2000;9(1):23–36.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bowie P, Bradley N, Rushmer R. Clinical audit and quality improvement – time for a rethink? J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):42–8.CrossRef Bowie P, Bradley N, Rushmer R. Clinical audit and quality improvement – time for a rethink? J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):42–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gerritsen G, Molenbroek-Batenburg J, Sloot P, van Weert C. Auditsystemen, bekeken en vergeleken. Over het nut en gebruik van audits. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij SWP; 2000. Gerritsen G, Molenbroek-Batenburg J, Sloot P, van Weert C. Auditsystemen, bekeken en vergeleken. Over het nut en gebruik van audits. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij SWP; 2000.
20.
go back to reference Brugha R, Varvazovsky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(3):239–46.CrossRef Brugha R, Varvazovsky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(3):239–46.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bryson JM. What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Manag Rev. 2004;6(1):21–53.CrossRef Bryson JM. What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Manag Rev. 2004;6(1):21–53.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bryson JM, Patton MQ. Bowman RA working with evaluation stakeholders: a rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval Program Plann. 2011;34(1):1–12.CrossRef Bryson JM, Patton MQ. Bowman RA working with evaluation stakeholders: a rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval Program Plann. 2011;34(1):1–12.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(3):239–46.CrossRef Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(3):239–46.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Glacken M, Chaney D. Perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing research findings in the Irish practice setting. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(6):731–40.CrossRef Glacken M, Chaney D. Perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing research findings in the Irish practice setting. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(6):731–40.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hutchinson AM, Johnston L. Bridging the divide: a survey of nurses’ opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization in the practice setting. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(3):304–15.CrossRef Hutchinson AM, Johnston L. Bridging the divide: a survey of nurses’ opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization in the practice setting. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(3):304–15.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009.
27.
go back to reference Mihret D, Yismaw A. Internal audit effectiveness: an Ethiopian public sector case study. Manag Audit J. 2007;22(5):470–84.CrossRef Mihret D, Yismaw A. Internal audit effectiveness: an Ethiopian public sector case study. Manag Audit J. 2007;22(5):470–84.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Botje D, Klazinga NS, Suñol R, Groene O, Pfaff H, Mannion R, et al. Is having quality as an item on the executive board agenda associated with the implementation of quality management systems in European hospitals: a quantitative analysis. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26:1–8.CrossRef Botje D, Klazinga NS, Suñol R, Groene O, Pfaff H, Mannion R, et al. Is having quality as an item on the executive board agenda associated with the implementation of quality management systems in European hospitals: a quantitative analysis. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26:1–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bismark MM, Studdert DM. Governance of quality of care: a qualitative study of health service boards in Victoria. Australia BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(6):474–82.CrossRef Bismark MM, Studdert DM. Governance of quality of care: a qualitative study of health service boards in Victoria. Australia BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(6):474–82.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Conway MS. Getting boards on board: engaging governing boards in quality and safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(4):214–20.CrossRef Conway MS. Getting boards on board: engaging governing boards in quality and safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(4):214–20.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Leistikow IP, Kalkman CJ, de Bruijn H. Why patient safety is such a tough nut to crack. BMJ. 2011;342:d3447.CrossRef Leistikow IP, Kalkman CJ, de Bruijn H. Why patient safety is such a tough nut to crack. BMJ. 2011;342:d3447.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zuidgeest M, Luijkx KG, Westert GP, Delnoij DM. Legal rights of client councils and their role in policy of long-term care organisations in the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):215.CrossRef Zuidgeest M, Luijkx KG, Westert GP, Delnoij DM. Legal rights of client councils and their role in policy of long-term care organisations in the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):215.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ. Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development. Health Care Anal 2009;17(3):198–216. Van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ. Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development. Health Care Anal 2009;17(3):198–216.
36.
go back to reference Dobrow MJ, Orchard MC, Golden B, Holowaty E, Paszat L, Brown AD, et al. Response audit of an internet survey of healthcare providers and administrators: implications for determination of response rates. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e30.CrossRef Dobrow MJ, Orchard MC, Golden B, Holowaty E, Paszat L, Brown AD, et al. Response audit of an internet survey of healthcare providers and administrators: implications for determination of response rates. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e30.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wiebe ER, Kaczorowski J, MacKay J. Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining? Can Fam Physician. 2012;58:e225–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Wiebe ER, Kaczorowski J, MacKay J. Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining? Can Fam Physician. 2012;58:e225–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:61–7.CrossRef Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:61–7.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Weiner BJ, Shortell SM, Alexander J. Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: the effects of top management, board, and physician leadership. Health Serv Res. 2007;32(4):491. Weiner BJ, Shortell SM, Alexander J. Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: the effects of top management, board, and physician leadership. Health Serv Res. 2007;32(4):491.
40.
go back to reference Alimo-Metcalfe B. Engaging boards: the relationship between governance and leadership, and improving the quality and safety of patient care. London: The Kings Fund; 2012. Alimo-Metcalfe B. Engaging boards: the relationship between governance and leadership, and improving the quality and safety of patient care. London: The Kings Fund; 2012.
41.
go back to reference Feng XQ, Acord L, Cheng YJ, Zeng JH, Song JP. The relationship between management safety commitment and patient safety culture. Int Nurs Rev. 2011;58(2):249–54.CrossRef Feng XQ, Acord L, Cheng YJ, Zeng JH, Song JP. The relationship between management safety commitment and patient safety culture. Int Nurs Rev. 2011;58(2):249–54.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Millar R, Mannion R, Freeman T, Davies HT. Hospital board oversight of quality and patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical research. Milbank Q. 2013;91(4):738–70.CrossRef Millar R, Mannion R, Freeman T, Davies HT. Hospital board oversight of quality and patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical research. Milbank Q. 2013;91(4):738–70.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Conway PH, Mostashari F, Clancy C. The future of quality measurement for improvement and accountability. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2215–6.CrossRef Conway PH, Mostashari F, Clancy C. The future of quality measurement for improvement and accountability. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2215–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Important factors for effective patient safety governance auditing: a questionnaire survey
Authors
Saskia C. van Gelderen
Marieke Zegers
Paul B. Robben
Wilma Boeijen
Gert P. Westert
Hub C. Wollersheim
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3577-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue