Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi

Authors: Helen Smith, Atnafu Getachew Asfaw, Kyaw Myint Aung, Lastone Chikoti, Florence Mgawadere, Luigi d’Aquino, Nynke van den Broek

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In 2014 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a new tool to be used to assess the quality of care for mothers, newborns and children provided at healthcare facility level. This paper reports on the feasibility of using the tool, its limitations and strengths.

Methods

Across 5 districts in Malawi, 35 healthcare facilities were assessed. The WHO tool includes checklists, interviews and observation of case management by which care is assessed against agreed standards using a Likert scale (1 lowest: not meeting standard, 5 highest: compliant with standard). Descriptive statistics were used to provide summary scores for each standard. A ‘dashboard’ system was developed to display the results.

Results

For maternal care three areas met standards; 1) supportive care for admitted patients (71% of healthcare facilities scored 4 or 5); 2) prevention and management of infections during pregnancy (71% scored 4 or 5); and 3) management of unsatisfactory progress of labour (84% scored 4 or 5). Availability of essential equipment and supplies was noted to be a critical barrier to achieving satisfactory standards of paediatric care (mean score; standard deviation: 2.9; SD 0.95) and child care (2.7; SD 1.1). Infection control is inadequate across all districts for maternal, newborn and paediatric care. Quality of care varies across districts with a mean (SD) score for all standards combined of 3 (SD 0.19) for the worst performing district and 4 (SD 0.27) for the best. The best performing district has an average score of 4 (SD 0.27). Hospitals had good scores for overall infrastructure, essential drugs, organisation of care and management of preterm labour. However, health centres were better at case management of HIV/AIDS patients and follow-up of sick children.

Conclusions

There is a need to develop an expanded framework of standards which is inclusive of all areas of care. In addition, it is important to ensure structure, process and outcomes of health care are reflected.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Madaj B, Smith H, Mathai M, et al. Developing global indicators for quality of maternal and newborn care: a feasibility assessment using health facility data from ten countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(6):445–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Madaj B, Smith H, Mathai M, et al. Developing global indicators for quality of maternal and newborn care: a feasibility assessment using health facility data from ten countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(6):445–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA): an annual monitoring system for service delivery: Reference manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. World Health Organization. Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA): an annual monitoring system for service delivery: Reference manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
8.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Health Facility Survey: tool to evaluate the quality of care delivered to sick children attending outpatients facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. World Health Organization. Health Facility Survey: tool to evaluate the quality of care delivered to sick children attending outpatients facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Hospital care for mothers and newborn babies: quality assessment and improvement tool (second edition). Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2014. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Hospital care for mothers and newborn babies: quality assessment and improvement tool (second edition). Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2014.
10.
go back to reference Ministry of Health. Malawi Standard Treatment Guidelines. 5th ed. Lilongwe: Government of Malawi; 2015. Ministry of Health. Malawi Standard Treatment Guidelines. 5th ed. Lilongwe: Government of Malawi; 2015.
12.
go back to reference Hulton L, Matthews Z, Stones RW. A framework for the evaluation of quality of care in maternity services. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2000. Hulton L, Matthews Z, Stones RW. A framework for the evaluation of quality of care in maternity services. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2000.
13.
go back to reference Simmons R, Elias C. The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues. Stud Fam Plan. 1999;25:1–17.CrossRef Simmons R, Elias C. The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues. Stud Fam Plan. 1999;25:1–17.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Vogel J, et al. Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multi-country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2013;381:747–55.CrossRef Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Vogel J, et al. Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multi-country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2013;381:747–55.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference van den Broek N. Content and quality – integrated, holistic, one-stop antenatal care is needed for all. BJOG. 2016;123:558.CrossRefPubMed van den Broek N. Content and quality – integrated, holistic, one-stop antenatal care is needed for all. BJOG. 2016;123:558.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Raven J, Hofman J, Adegoke A, van den Broek N. Methodology and tools for quality improvement in maternal and newborn health care. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;114:4–9.CrossRef Raven J, Hofman J, Adegoke A, van den Broek N. Methodology and tools for quality improvement in maternal and newborn health care. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;114:4–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Maaloe N, Housseine N, Bygbjerg C, Meguid T, Khamis RS, Mohamed AG, et al. Stillbirths and quality of care during labour at the low resource referral hospital of Zanzibar: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:351.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maaloe N, Housseine N, Bygbjerg C, Meguid T, Khamis RS, Mohamed AG, et al. Stillbirths and quality of care during labour at the low resource referral hospital of Zanzibar: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:351.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi
Authors
Helen Smith
Atnafu Getachew Asfaw
Kyaw Myint Aung
Lastone Chikoti
Florence Mgawadere
Luigi d’Aquino
Nynke van den Broek
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1461-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue