Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Case study

Implementing guidelines on physical health in the acute mental health setting: a quality improvement approach

Authors: Stuart Green, Ed Beveridge, Liz Evans, Jenny Trite, Sandra Jayacodi, Rachel Evered, Caroline Parker, Luca Polledri, Emily Tabb, John Green, Anton Manickam, Joanna Williams, Rebecca Deere, Bill Tiplady

Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the UK, life expectancy for people living with a serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, is reduced by 15–20 years compared with the general population. In recent years, evidence based guidelines/policies designed to improve their physical health have been published, yet a gap remains between recommendations and practice. This case study describes how guidelines to support physical health were implemented using a quality improvement approach.

Case presentation

A quasi-experimental study explored systems and processes for assessing the physical health of patients admitted to an acute mental health unit. The multi-disciplinary team of healthcare professionals, service users and experts in quality improvement methods developed solutions to improve the assessment of physical health, drawing on existing guidelines/policies as well as professional and lived experience. Three key interventions were developed: a comprehensive physical health assessment; a patient-held physical health booklet; and education and training for staff and patients. Interventions were co-designed by front-line healthcare staff and service users with iterative development and implementation through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Real-time weekly data were reported on five measures over a 15-month implementation period (318 patients) and compared to a 10-month baseline period (247 patients) to gauge the success of the implementation of the physical health assessment. Improvements were seen in the numbers of patients receiving a physical health assessment: 81.3% (201/247) vs 96.9% (308/318), recording of body mass index: 21.55% (53/247) vs 58.6% (204/318) and systolic blood pressure: 22.35% (55/247) vs 75.9% (239/318) but a reduction in the recording of smoking status: 80.1% (198/247) vs 70.9% (225/318). However, 31.7% (118/318) patients had a cardiovascular risk-score documented in the implementation phase, compared to none in the baseline.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the use of a quality improvement approach to support teams to implement guidelines on physical health in the acute mental health setting. Reflections of the team have identified the need for resources, training, support and leadership to support changes to the way care is delivered. Furthermore, collaborations between service users and frontline clinical staff can co-design interventions to support improvements and raise awareness of the physical health needs of this population.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Chang CK, Hayes RD, Perera G, Broadbent MTM, Fernandes AC, Lee WE, et al. Life expectancy at birth for people with serious mental illness and other major disorders from a secondary mental health care case register in London. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e19590.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang CK, Hayes RD, Perera G, Broadbent MTM, Fernandes AC, Lee WE, et al. Life expectancy at birth for people with serious mental illness and other major disorders from a secondary mental health care case register in London. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e19590.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Health and Social Care Information Centre. Mental Health Bulletin: annual report from MHMDS returns—England 2011–12. Leeds; 2013. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Mental Health Bulletin: annual report from MHMDS returns—England 2011–12. Leeds; 2013.
4.
go back to reference Department of Health. Closing the Gap: priorities for essential change in mental health. 2014; 1–40. Department of Health. Closing the Gap: priorities for essential change in mental health. 2014; 1–40.
5.
go back to reference Nash M. Diagnostic overshadowing: a potential barrier to physical health care for mental health service users. Mental Health Pract. 2013;17:22–3.CrossRef Nash M. Diagnostic overshadowing: a potential barrier to physical health care for mental health service users. Mental Health Pract. 2013;17:22–3.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Bipolar disorder: assessment and management (CG185). London; 2014. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Bipolar disorder: assessment and management (CG185). London; 2014.
8.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management (CG178). London; 2014. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management (CG178). London; 2014.
9.
go back to reference Royal College of Psychiatrists. Report of the Second Round of the National Audit of Schizophrenia (NAS). London; 2014. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Report of the Second Round of the National Audit of Schizophrenia (NAS). London; 2014.
10.
go back to reference Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–11.CrossRefPubMed Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–11.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Service user experience in adult mental health: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS mental health services. London; 2011. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Service user experience in adult mental health: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS mental health services. London; 2011.
12.
go back to reference Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence 2.0: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:986–92.CrossRefPubMed Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence 2.0: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:986–92.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van Dijk MK, Verbraak MJ, Oosterbaan DB, van Balkom AJ. Implementing practice guidelines for anxiety disorders in secondary mental health care: a case study. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2012;6:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Dijk MK, Verbraak MJ, Oosterbaan DB, van Balkom AJ. Implementing practice guidelines for anxiety disorders in secondary mental health care: a case study. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2012;6:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Faulkner A, Crepaz-Keay D, Kalathil J, Griffiths R, James N, Perry E, et al. 4Pi-National Involvement Standards. London: National survivor User Network (NSUN); 2015. Faulkner A, Crepaz-Keay D, Kalathil J, Griffiths R, James N, Perry E, et al. 4Pi-National Involvement Standards. London: National survivor User Network (NSUN); 2015.
15.
go back to reference Green SA, Evans L, Matthews R, Jayacodi S, Trite J, Manickam A, et al. Service user engagement in quality improvement: applying the national involvement standards. J Mental Health Train Educ Pract. 2016;11:279–85.CrossRef Green SA, Evans L, Matthews R, Jayacodi S, Trite J, Manickam A, et al. Service user engagement in quality improvement: applying the national involvement standards. J Mental Health Train Educ Pract. 2016;11:279–85.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Reed JE, McNicholas C, Woodcock T, Issen L, Bell D. Designing quality improvement initiatives: the action effect method, a structured approach to identifying and articulating programme theory. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:1040–8.CrossRefPubMed Reed JE, McNicholas C, Woodcock T, Issen L, Bell D. Designing quality improvement initiatives: the action effect method, a structured approach to identifying and articulating programme theory. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:1040–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Locock L. Healthcare redesign: meaning, origins and application. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:53–7.CrossRefPubMed Locock L. Healthcare redesign: meaning, origins and application. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:53–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Improvement leaders’ guide: process mapping, analysis and redesign. Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2007. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Improvement leaders’ guide: process mapping, analysis and redesign. Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2007.
19.
go back to reference Mental Health Taskforce. The five year forward view for mental health. London; 2016. Mental Health Taskforce. The five year forward view for mental health. London; 2016.
20.
go back to reference Langley GJ, Moen R, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (Google eBook). New York: Wiley; 2009. Langley GJ, Moen R, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (Google eBook). New York: Wiley; 2009.
21.
go back to reference Shiers DE, Rafi I, Cooper SJHR. Positive cardiometabolic health resource: an intervention framework for people experiencing psychosis and schizophrenia. 2014 update. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2014. Shiers DE, Rafi I, Cooper SJHR. Positive cardiometabolic health resource: an intervention framework for people experiencing psychosis and schizophrenia. 2014 update. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2014.
22.
go back to reference JBS3 Board. Joint British Societies’ consensus recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (JBS3). Heart. 2014;100(Suppl 2):ii1–67.CrossRef JBS3 Board. Joint British Societies’ consensus recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (JBS3). Heart. 2014;100(Suppl 2):ii1–67.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Barber S, Thakkar K, Marvin V, Franklin BD, Bell D. Evaluation of my medication passport: a patient-completed aide-memoire designed by patients, for patients, to help towards medicines optimisation. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barber S, Thakkar K, Marvin V, Franklin BD, Bell D. Evaluation of my medication passport: a patient-completed aide-memoire designed by patients, for patients, to help towards medicines optimisation. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Perkins R, Repper J, Rinaldi M, Brown Hl. Recovery colleges. Implementing recovery through organisational change. NHS Centre for Mental Health. 2012. Perkins R, Repper J, Rinaldi M, Brown Hl. Recovery colleges. Implementing recovery through organisational change. NHS Centre for Mental Health. 2012.
25.
go back to reference Langley GL, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost L. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2009. Langley GL, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost L. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2009.
26.
go back to reference Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y, Robson J, Minhas R, Sheikh A, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. BMJ. 2008;336:1475–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y, Robson J, Minhas R, Sheikh A, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. BMJ. 2008;336:1475–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Curcin V, Woodcock TT, Poots AJ, Majeed A, Bell D. Model-driven approach to data collection and reporting for quality improvement. 2013;52:151–62 (in prep). Curcin V, Woodcock TT, Poots AJ, Majeed A, Bell D. Model-driven approach to data collection and reporting for quality improvement. 2013;52:151–62 (in prep).
28.
go back to reference Wheeler DDJ. Advanced topics in statistical process control. 2nd ed. Knoxville: SPC Press; 2004. Wheeler DDJ. Advanced topics in statistical process control. 2nd ed. Knoxville: SPC Press; 2004.
29.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Bridging the “Know–Do” Gap. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. World Health Organization. Bridging the “Know–Do” Gap. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
30.
go back to reference Kotter JP. Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1996. Kotter JP. Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1996.
31.
go back to reference Clarke D, Jones F, Harris R, Robert G, on behalf of the Collaborative Rehabilitation Environments in Acute Stroke (CREATE) team. What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2016;7:1–25. Clarke D, Jones F, Harris R, Robert G, on behalf of the Collaborative Rehabilitation Environments in Acute Stroke (CREATE) team. What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2016;7:1–25.
Metadata
Title
Implementing guidelines on physical health in the acute mental health setting: a quality improvement approach
Authors
Stuart Green
Ed Beveridge
Liz Evans
Jenny Trite
Sandra Jayacodi
Rachel Evered
Caroline Parker
Luca Polledri
Emily Tabb
John Green
Anton Manickam
Joanna Williams
Rebecca Deere
Bill Tiplady
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1752-4458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0179-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue