Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Article

Implementing a robotics curriculum at an academic general surgery training program: our initial experience

Authors: Joshua S. Winder, Ryan M. Juza, Jennifer Sasaki, Ann M. Rogers, Eric M. Pauli, Randy S. Haluck, Stephanie J. Estes, Jerome R. Lyn-Sue

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The robotic surgical platform is being utilized by a growing number of hospitals across the country, including academic medical centers. Training programs are tasked with teaching their residents how to utilize this technology. To this end, we have developed and implemented a robotic surgical curriculum, and share our initial experience here. Our curriculum was implemented for all General Surgical residents for the academic year 2014–2015. The curriculum consisted of online training, readings, bedside training, console simulation, participating in ten cases as bedside first assistant, and operating at the console. 20 surgical residents were included. Residents were provided the curriculum and notified the department upon completion. Bedside assistance and operative console training were completed in the operating room through a mix of biliary, foregut, and colorectal cases. During the fiscal years of 2014 and 2015, there were 164 and 263 robot-assisted surgeries performed within the General Surgery Department, respectively. All 20 residents completed the online and bedside instruction portions of the curriculum. Of the 20 residents trained, 13/20 (65 %) sat at the Surgeon console during at least one case. Utilizing this curriculum, we have trained and incorporated residents into robot-assisted cases in an efficient manner. A successful curriculum must be based on didactic learning, reading, bedside training, simulation, and training in the operating room. Each program must examine their caseload and resident class to ensure proper exposure to this platform.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wormer BA, Dacey KT, Williams KB, Bradley JF 3rd, Walters AL, Augenstein VA et al (2014) The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start. Surg Endosc 28(3):767–776. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3239-2 CrossRefPubMed Wormer BA, Dacey KT, Williams KB, Bradley JF 3rd, Walters AL, Augenstein VA et al (2014) The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start. Surg Endosc 28(3):767–776. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-3239-2 CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am surg 79(6):553–560PubMed Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am surg 79(6):553–560PubMed
5.
7.
go back to reference Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e6239e CrossRefPubMed Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181e6239e​ CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Schroeck FR, de Sousa CA, Kalman RA, Kalia MS, Pierre SA, Haleblian GE et al (2008) Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate. Urology 71(4):597–601. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.023 CrossRefPubMed Schroeck FR, de Sousa CA, Kalman RA, Kalia MS, Pierre SA, Haleblian GE et al (2008) Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate. Urology 71(4):597–601. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2007.​12.​023 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Juza RMHRS, Won EJ, Enomoto LM, Pauli EM, Rogers AM, Singhal V, Tran TT, Estes SJ, LynSue JR (2014) Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously: initial experiences with safety and efficiency. J Robot Surg 8:227–231CrossRef Juza RMHRS, Won EJ, Enomoto LM, Pauli EM, Rogers AM, Singhal V, Tran TT, Estes SJ, LynSue JR (2014) Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously: initial experiences with safety and efficiency. J Robot Surg 8:227–231CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M (2011) Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 25(2):597–603. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1229-1 CrossRefPubMed Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M (2011) Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 25(2):597–603. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1229-1 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Seixas-Mikelus SA, Adal A, Kesavadas T, Baheti A, Srimathveeravalli G, Hussain A et al (2010) Can image-based virtual reality help teach anatomy? J Endourol/Endourol Soc 24(4):629–634. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0556 CrossRef Seixas-Mikelus SA, Adal A, Kesavadas T, Baheti A, Srimathveeravalli G, Hussain A et al (2010) Can image-based virtual reality help teach anatomy? J Endourol/Endourol Soc 24(4):629–634. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2009.​0556 CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Raza SJ, Froghi S, Chowriappa A, Ahmed K, Field E, Stegemann AP et al (2014) Construct validation of the key components of fundamental skills of robotic surgery (FSRS) curriculum—a multi-institution prospective study. J Surg Educ 71(3):316–324. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.006 CrossRefPubMed Raza SJ, Froghi S, Chowriappa A, Ahmed K, Field E, Stegemann AP et al (2014) Construct validation of the key components of fundamental skills of robotic surgery (FSRS) curriculum—a multi-institution prospective study. J Surg Educ 71(3):316–324. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jsurg.​2013.​10.​006 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Syana SRP, Gilla IS, Arona M, Hunga AJ (2013) Does virtual performance correlate with clinical skills in robotics? Investigating concurrent validity of da vinci simulation with clinical performance. J Urol 189(4):e643. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3097 CrossRef Syana SRP, Gilla IS, Arona M, Hunga AJ (2013) Does virtual performance correlate with clinical skills in robotics? Investigating concurrent validity of da vinci simulation with clinical performance. J Urol 189(4):e643. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2013.​02.​3097 CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rocco B, Lorusso A, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Patel VR (2009) Building a robotic program. Scand J Surg SJS Off Organ Finn Surg Soc Scand Surg Soc 98(2):72–75 Rocco B, Lorusso A, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Patel VR (2009) Building a robotic program. Scand J Surg SJS Off Organ Finn Surg Soc Scand Surg Soc 98(2):72–75
Metadata
Title
Implementing a robotics curriculum at an academic general surgery training program: our initial experience
Authors
Joshua S. Winder
Ryan M. Juza
Jennifer Sasaki
Ann M. Rogers
Eric M. Pauli
Randy S. Haluck
Stephanie J. Estes
Jerome R. Lyn-Sue
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0569-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2016 Go to the issue