Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Prevention 1/2019

01-02-2019 | Commentary

Implementation Through Community Coalitions: The Power of Technology and of Community-Based Intermediaries

Authors: Ross Homel, Sara Branch, Kate Freiberg

Published in: Journal of Prevention | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The measurement and monitoring of implementation fidelity or of adaptations to interventions in the ways described by the innovative papers in this special issue implies the need for an ‘implementation infrastructure’ to help assure the quality and hence impact of prevention delivery systems. In our work in Australia through schools and government-funded community services in socially disadvantaged communities we have begun to build such an infrastructure, which we call a Prevention Translation and Support System (PTSS). We offer our methodologies not as a template but as an illustration of one approach, designed for use with community coalitions. We aim to work in respectful partnerships with frontline professionals to construct, test, modify, and implement measurement tools and other electronic resources that can facilitate data-driven decision making and evidence-based practice, and generally promote the translation of prevention science into routine practice. The development and use of these technological resources are supported by community workers called Collective Change Facilitators, who act as a ’human bridge’ between the worlds of research and practice. They serve as a critical friend to community coalitions, while also translating the needs of service deliverers back to the researchers and practitioners building the PTSS. One example of this engagement was the development and use of a multidimensional measure of coalition function, the Coalition Wellbeing Survey, that helps coalition leaders plan responsive action to overcome identified areas of difficulty and strengthen coalition function. The need for such a tool, accompanied by comprehensive resources, was identified early in our work as essential for the high-quality implementation by community coalitions of evidence-based services. We conclude that implementation of preventive innovations on a large scale, especially those in which technology is embedded to support measurement and monitoring, calls for the creation of new kinds of intermediate organizations that can help sustain a continuous process of research and quality improvement in the field.
Footnotes
1
Readers interested in our work are invited to visit www.​creatingpathways​.​org.​au and www.​realwell.​org.​au. For an account of the evolution of the research program, see www.​griffith.​edu.​au/​research/​impact/​keeping-children-out-of-prison.
 
2
We also use the term Collective Impact Facilitator, but some occupants of this role have suggested alternative titles, including the term we use in this Commentary.
 
3
Because we have been engaged in a continuous cycle of development, testing, refinement, and redevelopment, we have not yet published this methodology. A presentation on the early impact of Collective Change/Impact Facilitators on coalition wellbeing (using the Coalition Wellbeing Survey as outcome measure) was given at the Society for Prevention Research in San Francisco on June 1, 2016 (Homel, Freiberg, Bumbarger, & Tilbury, 2016).
 
Literature
go back to reference Homel, R., Freiberg, K., Bumbarger, B. & Tilbury, C. (2016). How well do community prevention ‘coalitions’ function? The case of the Australian Government’s Communities for Children partnerships. Presentation at the Society for Prevention Research annual conference, San Francisco, June 1, 2016. Homel, R., Freiberg, K., Bumbarger, B. & Tilbury, C. (2016). How well do community prevention ‘coalitions’ function? The case of the Australian Government’s Communities for Children partnerships. Presentation at the Society for Prevention Research annual conference, San Francisco, June 1, 2016.
go back to reference Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181.CrossRefPubMed Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Implementation Through Community Coalitions: The Power of Technology and of Community-Based Intermediaries
Authors
Ross Homel
Sara Branch
Kate Freiberg
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Prevention / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2731-5533
Electronic ISSN: 2731-5541
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00541-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Prevention 1/2019 Go to the issue