Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2014

01-07-2014 | Gynecologic Oncology

Implementation of robot-assisted gynecologic surgery for patients with low and high BMI in a German gynecological cancer center

Authors: Päivi Kannisto, Philipp Harter, Florian Heitz, Alexander Traut, Andreas du Bois, Christian Kurzeder

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To present a single center outcome from an initial series of gynecological robotic cases with a special reference to obese patients.

Methods

A retrospective evaluation of 116 women, undergoing elective gynecologic robot-assisted surgery from February 2011 to December 2012. Procedures included hysterectomy (HE), radical HE, adnexectomy, myomectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy and paraaortic lymphadenectomy, sentinel node extraction, and omentectomy. The feasibility and outcome were investigated in relation to normal and high body mass index (BMI < 30 and BMI ≥ 30).

Results

The overall complication rate was low (15/116; 12.9 %). The number of perioperative complications was not different between the patients with normal BMI compared to those with high BMI. Five operations were converted to open surgery due to vascular injury (2), intestinal injury (2) and one insufficiently exposed paraaortic field in an endometrial cancer patient. Urinary bladder was injured once. Late complications included vaginal dehisce (2), vaginal hemorrhage (1), cuff hematoma (4), lymphocyst (1) and two urinary tract injuries. The rate of the late complications was not significantly different in the two groups of patients (p = 0.139). A significant difference in patients’ positioning time was observed between normal weighted and obese patients (35 and 55 min, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Robotic procedure was feasible and could be implemented for treating the first setting of mixed indications for gynecologic surgery. Robotic surgery may offer particular advantages in obese patients with no conversions and no wound complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A et al (2008) What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol 111:41–45PubMedCrossRef Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A et al (2008) What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol 111:41–45PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Persson J (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly-obese women: surgical technique and comparison with open surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:1210–1217PubMedCrossRef Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Persson J (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly-obese women: surgical technique and comparison with open surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:1210–1217PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS et al (2009) Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients comparing robotics and laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 114:17–21CrossRef Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS et al (2009) Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients comparing robotics and laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 114:17–21CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bernardini MQ, Gien LT, Tipping H, Murphy J, Rosen BP (2012) Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:76–81PubMedCrossRef Bernardini MQ, Gien LT, Tipping H, Murphy J, Rosen BP (2012) Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:76–81PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Obermaier A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond LG, McCartley AJ (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:319–324CrossRef Obermaier A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond LG, McCartley AJ (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:319–324CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lanowska M, Brink-Spalink V, Hasenbein K, Schneider A, Marnitz S, Köhler C (2010) Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer. J Cancer Ther 1:181–191CrossRef Lanowska M, Brink-Spalink V, Hasenbein K, Schneider A, Marnitz S, Köhler C (2010) Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer. J Cancer Ther 1:181–191CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lau S, Buzaglo K, Vaknin Z et al (2011) Relationship between body mass index and robotic surgery outcome of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:722–729PubMedCrossRef Lau S, Buzaglo K, Vaknin Z et al (2011) Relationship between body mass index and robotic surgery outcome of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:722–729PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Darlin L, Persson J, Bossmar T et al (2010) The sentinel node concept in early cervical cancer performs well in tumors smaller than 2 cm. Gynecol Oncol 117:266–269PubMedCrossRef Darlin L, Persson J, Bossmar T et al (2010) The sentinel node concept in early cervical cancer performs well in tumors smaller than 2 cm. Gynecol Oncol 117:266–269PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nawfal AK, Orady M, Eisenstein D, Wegienka G (2011) Effect of body mass index on robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:328–332PubMedCrossRef Nawfal AK, Orady M, Eisenstein D, Wegienka G (2011) Effect of body mass index on robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:328–332PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Siedhoff MT, Carey ET, Findley AD et al (2012) Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:701–707PubMedCrossRef Siedhoff MT, Carey ET, Findley AD et al (2012) Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:701–707PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL et al (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114:162–167PubMedCrossRef Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL et al (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114:162–167PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM (2009) Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 113:36–41PubMedCrossRef Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM (2009) Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 113:36–41PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Camanni M, Bonino L, Delpiano EM, Migliaretti G, Berchialla P, Deltetto F (2010) Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:576–582PubMedCrossRef Camanni M, Bonino L, Delpiano EM, Migliaretti G, Berchialla P, Deltetto F (2010) Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:576–582PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tang KY, Gardiner SK, Gould C, Osmundsen B, Collins M, Winter WE (2011) Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:513. e1–e6 Tang KY, Gardiner SK, Gould C, Osmundsen B, Collins M, Winter WE (2011) Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:513. e1–e6
15.
go back to reference Singh S, Laughingwell R, Rosenblum NG (2012) Perioperative morbidity associated with medically necessary panniculectomy in gynecologic oncology surgery. Int J Obstet Gynecol 118:47–51CrossRef Singh S, Laughingwell R, Rosenblum NG (2012) Perioperative morbidity associated with medically necessary panniculectomy in gynecologic oncology surgery. Int J Obstet Gynecol 118:47–51CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mitas L, Rogulski L, Ziebinski J (2012) Does obesity complicate perioperative course in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy? Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:385–388PubMedCrossRef Mitas L, Rogulski L, Ziebinski J (2012) Does obesity complicate perioperative course in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy? Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:385–388PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Giugale L, Di Santo N, Smolkin M, Havrilesky L, Modesitt S (2012) Beyond mere obesity: effect of increasing obesity classifications on hysterectomy outcomes for uterine cancer/hyperplasia. Gynecol Oncol 127:326–331PubMedCrossRef Giugale L, Di Santo N, Smolkin M, Havrilesky L, Modesitt S (2012) Beyond mere obesity: effect of increasing obesity classifications on hysterectomy outcomes for uterine cancer/hyperplasia. Gynecol Oncol 127:326–331PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gallo T, Kashani S, Patel DA, Elsahwi K, Silasi D-A, Azodi M (2012) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome in obese and morbidly obese patients. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 16:421–427CrossRef Gallo T, Kashani S, Patel DA, Elsahwi K, Silasi D-A, Azodi M (2012) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome in obese and morbidly obese patients. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 16:421–427CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Implementation of robot-assisted gynecologic surgery for patients with low and high BMI in a German gynecological cancer center
Authors
Päivi Kannisto
Philipp Harter
Florian Heitz
Alexander Traut
Andreas du Bois
Christian Kurzeder
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3169-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2014 Go to the issue