Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Study protocol

Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Nicolas Michel, Bernard Bui-Xuan, Lionel Bapteste, Thomas Rimmele, Marc Lilot, François Chollet, Hélène Favre, Antoine Duclos, Philippe Michel

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Morbidity and Mortality conference provides the necessary improvement measures for patient safety. However, they are an underused resource mainly because the conclusions to be drawn from the discussion and their implications for practice are not always well integrated by inpatient care teams. We therefore propose in this study two interventions to optimise their effectiveness: a passive feedback with wide dissemination by e-mail and/or on paper of the results of the Morbidity and Mortality conference to inpatient care teams and an active feedback with in situ inter-professional simulation-training programme in which scenarios will be based on cases studied in Morbidity and Mortality conference. In the present study, we hypothesise that the greatest reduction the occurrence of adverse event will be in the active feedback arm.

Methods

A cluster randomised controlled study will be performed at four study sites. The unit of randomisation is wards within the study sites. Fifteen wards will be randomly assigned to passive feedback, active feedback, or a standard MMC (control arm). Passive feedback and active feedback arms will be compared to standard arm in terms of occurrence of adverse events. The trigger tool methodology used to identify adverse events is a retrospective review of inpatient records using “triggers”: an adverse event is defined as a patient’s stay with at least one positive trigger.

Discussion

The in situ simulation training based on cases processed in Morbidity and Mortality conference is built according to the main topics identified for the successful implementation of healthcare simulation in patient safety programmes: technical skills, nontechnical skills, assessment, effectiveness, and system probing. The in situ simulation-training programme conducted as part of the study has the potential to improve patient safety during hospitalisation. We therefore expect the greatest reduction in the occurrence of adverse events in patients hospitalised in the active feedback arm. This expected result would have a direct impact on patient safety and would place in situ simulation at the highest level of the Kirkpatrick model.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.​gov NCT02771613. Registered on May 12, 2016. All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data Set can be found within the protocol.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Reverby S. Stealing the golden eggs: Ernest Amory Codman and the science and management of medicine. Bull Hist Med. 1981;55(2):156–71.PubMed Reverby S. Stealing the golden eggs: Ernest Amory Codman and the science and management of medicine. Bull Hist Med. 1981;55(2):156–71.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Patterson MD, Blike GT, Nadkarni VM. In situ simulation: challenges and results. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. (Advances in Patient Safety). [cited 2019 Aug 19]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43682/. Patterson MD, Blike GT, Nadkarni VM. In situ simulation: challenges and results. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. (Advances in Patient Safety). [cited 2019 Aug 19]. Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK43682/​.
31.
33.
35.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006. p. 399. Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006. p. 399.
Metadata
Title
Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Nicolas Michel
Bernard Bui-Xuan
Lionel Bapteste
Thomas Rimmele
Marc Lilot
François Chollet
Hélène Favre
Antoine Duclos
Philippe Michel
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue