Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 4/2019

01-12-2019 | Original Research

Impact of Prior Malignancy on Survival Outcomes of Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: SEER-Based Cohort

Authors: Muneer J. Al-Husseini, Anas M. Saad, Tarek Turk, Mohamed A. Tabash, Omar Abdel-Rahman

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal malignancies and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA. Most clinical trials involving pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients exclude subjects with a prior malignancy because of the possible effect of prior malignancies on survival. However, no data in the medical literature support this assumption. In this paper, we aim to study the impact of having a prior malignancy on the survival outcomes of stage IV PAC.

Methods

We used the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database to review patients with stage IV PAC diagnosed between 1973 and 2014. We calculated overall and pancreatic cancer-specific survival of these patients using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier test and multivariable covariate-adjusted Cox models.

Results

We reviewed 66,874 stage IV PAC patients, of which 4942 had a prior malignancy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models showed that a history of prior malignancy did not cause significant difference in overall survival (HR = 0.938, 95%CI = 0.880–1.000, p = .052). However, a prior malignancy was associated with a better pancreatic cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.855, 95% CI = 0.796–0.918, p < .001).

Conclusion

A prior malignancy before stage IV PAC was not associated with worse survival outcomes. Researchers should take these results into consideration when including/excluding patients to improve the generalizability and accuracy of their results.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Epidemiology and prevention of pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34(5):238–44.CrossRef Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Epidemiology and prevention of pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34(5):238–44.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mohammed S, Van Buren GI, Fisher WE. Pancreatic cancer: advances in treatment. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2014;20(28):9354.PubMed Mohammed S, Van Buren GI, Fisher WE. Pancreatic cancer: advances in treatment. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2014;20(28):9354.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Laccetti AL, Pruitt SL, Xuan L, Halm EA, Gerber DE. Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107 Laccetti AL, Pruitt SL, Xuan L, Halm EA, Gerber DE. Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107
7.
go back to reference Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Chevret S, Levy V. Factors influencing inclusion of patients with malignancies in clinical trials. Cancer. 2006;106(2):258–70.CrossRef Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Chevret S, Levy V. Factors influencing inclusion of patients with malignancies in clinical trials. Cancer. 2006;106(2):258–70.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007;297(11):1233–40.CrossRef Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007;297(11):1233–40.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ries LA, Harkins D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg LX, Eisner MP, Horner MJ, Howlader N, Hayat M. SEER cancer statistics review. 1975-2003. Ries LA, Harkins D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg LX, Eisner MP, Horner MJ, Howlader N, Hayat M. SEER cancer statistics review. 1975-2003.
11.
go back to reference Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Custom Data (with additional treatment fields), November 2016 Sub (1973–2014 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969–2015 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2017, based on the November 2016 submission. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.​seer.​cancer.​gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Custom Data (with additional treatment fields), November 2016 Sub (1973–2014 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969–2015 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2017, based on the November 2016 submission.
12.
go back to reference Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887–92.CrossRef Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887–92.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gross CP, Mallory R, Heiat A, Krumholz HM. Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there? Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(1):10–6.CrossRef Gross CP, Mallory R, Heiat A, Krumholz HM. Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there? Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(1):10–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lara PN Jr, Higdon R, Lim N, Kwan K, Tanaka M, Lau DH, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1728–33.CrossRef Lara PN Jr, Higdon R, Lim N, Kwan K, Tanaka M, Lau DH, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1728–33.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials:“to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82–93.CrossRef Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials:“to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82–93.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Smyth EC, Tarazona N, Peckitt C, Armstrong E, Mansukhani S, Cunningham D, et al. Exclusion of gastrointestinal cancer patients with prior cancer from clinical trials: is this justified? Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(2):e53–e9.CrossRef Smyth EC, Tarazona N, Peckitt C, Armstrong E, Mansukhani S, Cunningham D, et al. Exclusion of gastrointestinal cancer patients with prior cancer from clinical trials: is this justified? Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(2):e53–e9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gerber DE, Laccetti AL, Xuan L, Halm EA, Pruitt SL. Impact of prior cancer on eligibility for lung cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(11):dju302.CrossRef Gerber DE, Laccetti AL, Xuan L, Halm EA, Pruitt SL. Impact of prior cancer on eligibility for lung cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(11):dju302.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Varty PP, Delrio P, Boulos PB. Survival in colorectal carcinoma associated with previous extracolonic cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76(3):180–4.PubMedPubMedCentral Varty PP, Delrio P, Boulos PB. Survival in colorectal carcinoma associated with previous extracolonic cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76(3):180–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Long-term survival of patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma after a previous malignancy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(2):179–86.CrossRef Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Long-term survival of patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma after a previous malignancy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(2):179–86.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Noone A-M, Lund JL, Mariotto A, Cronin K, McNeel T, Deapen D, et al. Comparison of SEER treatment data with Medicare claims. Med Care. 2016;54(9):e55–64.CrossRef Noone A-M, Lund JL, Mariotto A, Cronin K, McNeel T, Deapen D, et al. Comparison of SEER treatment data with Medicare claims. Med Care. 2016;54(9):e55–64.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference James BYM, Gross CP, Wilson LD, Smith BD. NCI SEER public-use data: applications and limitations in oncology research. Oncology. 2009;23(3):288. James BYM, Gross CP, Wilson LD, Smith BD. NCI SEER public-use data: applications and limitations in oncology research. Oncology. 2009;23(3):288.
23.
go back to reference Talarico L, Chen G, Pazdur R. Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(22):4626–31.CrossRef Talarico L, Chen G, Pazdur R. Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(22):4626–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of Prior Malignancy on Survival Outcomes of Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: SEER-Based Cohort
Authors
Muneer J. Al-Husseini
Anas M. Saad
Tarek Turk
Mohamed A. Tabash
Omar Abdel-Rahman
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1941-6628
Electronic ISSN: 1941-6636
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-018-0158-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 4/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine