Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article • SPINE - IMAGING

Impact of patient position on coronal Cobb angle measurement in non-ambulatory myelodysplastic patients

Authors: Norman Ramirez, Jorge Padilla, Sigfredo Villarin, Francisco Irizarry, Ivan Iriarte, Jeffrey Sawyer

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of patient position on the magnitude of the coronal Cobb angle measurements in relation to the change of position using plain radiograph on non-ambulatory children with myelodysplasia.

Summary of background data

Whole-spine radiographs with the patient sitting generally are preferred for the diagnosis and monitoring of progression of scoliosis in neuromuscular patients. Supine, supine traction, and sitting push-up positions have been used as substitutes, although there is no general consensus validating if these positions correlate with the sitting position. The magnitude of the Cobb angles in neuromuscular scoliosis may vary greatly depending on the position of the patient.

Methods

Radiographs of 39 myelodysplastic, non-ambulatory children were evaluated to assess the impact of change in positions (unsupported sitting, sitting push-up, supine, and supine traction) on coronal Cobb angle measurement using plain whole-spine radiographs.

Results

The mean difference in thoracic Cobb angle measurements between sitting and all other positions ranged from 6° to 12°. At the lumbar level, the Cobb angles ranged from 12° to 16°.

Conclusions

Statistically significant differences in the Cobb angle measurements were identified between plain radiographs of the whole spine with the patient in the unsupported sitting position compared to sitting push-up, supine, and supine traction positions. The data support that the magnitude of the Cobb angles in neuromuscular scoliosis varies greatly depending on the position of the patient.

Level of evidence

III.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Halawi M, Lark R, Fitch R (2015) Neuromuscular scoliosis: current concepts. Orthopedics 38:e452–e456CrossRefPubMed Halawi M, Lark R, Fitch R (2015) Neuromuscular scoliosis: current concepts. Orthopedics 38:e452–e456CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards JW (ed) Instructional course lectures. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeon, Ann Arbor, pp 261–275 Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards JW (ed) Instructional course lectures. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeon, Ann Arbor, pp 261–275
3.
go back to reference Gupta M, Wijesekera S, Sossan A et al (2007) Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 32:691–695CrossRefPubMed Gupta M, Wijesekera S, Sossan A et al (2007) Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 32:691–695CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brink RC, Colo D, Schlösser TPC et al (2017) Upright, prone, and supine spinal morphology and alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brink RC, Colo D, Schlösser TPC et al (2017) Upright, prone, and supine spinal morphology and alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Keenan BE, Izatt MT, Askin GN et al (2014) Supine to standing Cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of endplate pre-selection. Scoliosis 9:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keenan BE, Izatt MT, Askin GN et al (2014) Supine to standing Cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of endplate pre-selection. Scoliosis 9:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Vavruch L, Tropp H (2016) A comparison of Cobb angle: standing versus supine images of late-onset idiopathic scoliosis. Polish J Radiol 81:270–276CrossRef Vavruch L, Tropp H (2016) A comparison of Cobb angle: standing versus supine images of late-onset idiopathic scoliosis. Polish J Radiol 81:270–276CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Torell G, Nachemson A, Haderspeck-Grib K et al (1985) Standing and supine Cobb measures in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 10:425–427CrossRefPubMed Torell G, Nachemson A, Haderspeck-Grib K et al (1985) Standing and supine Cobb measures in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 10:425–427CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee MC, Solomito M, Patel A (2013) Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs. Spine 38:E656–E661CrossRefPubMed Lee MC, Solomito M, Patel A (2013) Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs. Spine 38:E656–E661CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wessberg P, Danielson BI, Willen J (2006) Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiographs and supine axially loaded MRI. Spine 31:3039–3044CrossRefPubMed Wessberg P, Danielson BI, Willen J (2006) Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiographs and supine axially loaded MRI. Spine 31:3039–3044CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Trivedi J, Thomson JD, Slakey JB et al (2002) Clinical and radiographic predictors of scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(8):1389–1394CrossRef Trivedi J, Thomson JD, Slakey JB et al (2002) Clinical and radiographic predictors of scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(8):1389–1394CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Canfield MA, Mai CT, Wang P, O’Halloran A, Marengo LK, Olney RS et al (2014) The association between race/ethnicity and major birth defects in the United States, 1999–2007. Am J Public Health 104:e1–e10CrossRef Canfield MA, Mai CT, Wang P, O’Halloran A, Marengo LK, Olney RS et al (2014) The association between race/ethnicity and major birth defects in the United States, 1999–2007. Am J Public Health 104:e1–e10CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of patient position on coronal Cobb angle measurement in non-ambulatory myelodysplastic patients
Authors
Norman Ramirez
Jorge Padilla
Sigfredo Villarin
Francisco Irizarry
Ivan Iriarte
Jeffrey Sawyer
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2264-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2019 Go to the issue