Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Original Article

Impact of Gluma Desensitizer on the tensile strength of zirconia crowns bonded to dentin: an in vitro study

Authors: Bogna Stawarczyk, Leonie Hartmann, Rahel Hartmann, Malgorzata Roos, Andreas Ender, Mutlu Özcan, Irena Sailer, Christoph H. F. Hämmerle

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

This study tested the impact of Gluma Desensitizer on the tensile strength of zirconia crowns bonded to dentin. Human teeth were prepared and randomly divided into six groups (N = 144, n = 24 per group). For each tooth, a zirconia crown was manufactured. The zirconia crowns were cemented with: (1) Panavia21 (PAN), (2) Panavia21 combined with Gluma Desensitizer (PAN-G), (3) RelyX Unicem (RXU), (4) RelyX Unicem combined with Gluma Desensitizer (RXU-G), (5) G-Cem (GCM) and (6) G-Cem combined with Gluma Desensitizer (GCM-G). The initial tensile strength was measured in half (n = 12) of each group and the other half (n = 12) subjected to a chewing machine (1.2 Mio, 49 N, 5°C/50°C). The cemented crowns were pulled in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min, Zwick Z010) until failure occurred and tensile strength was calculated. Data were analyzed with one-way and two-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Scheffé test, t test and Kaplan–Meier analysis with a Breslow–Gehan analysis test (α = 0.05). After the chewing simulation, the self-adhesive resin cements combined with Gluma Desensitizer showed significantly higher tensile strength (RXU-G, 12.8 ± 4.3 MPa; GCM-G, 13.4 ± 6.2 MPa) than PAN (7.3 ± 1.7 MPa) and PAN-G (0.9 ± 0.6). Within the groups, PAN, PAN-G and RXU resulted in significantly lower values when compared to the initial tensile strength; the values of all other test groups were stable. In this study, self-adhesive resin cements combined with Gluma Desensitizer reached better long-term stability compared to PAN and PAN-G after chewing simulation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sturzenegger B, Fehér A, Lüthy H, Schärer P, Gauckler LJ (2001) Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). Int J Comput Dent 4:89–106 Sturzenegger B, Fehér A, Lüthy H, Schärer P, Gauckler LJ (2001) Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). Int J Comput Dent 4:89–106
2.
go back to reference Lüthy H, Filser F, Loeffel O, Schumacher M, Gauckler LJ, Hämmerle CHF (2005) Strength and reliability of four unit all-ceramic posterior bridges. Dent Mater 21:930–937PubMedCrossRef Lüthy H, Filser F, Loeffel O, Schumacher M, Gauckler LJ, Hämmerle CHF (2005) Strength and reliability of four unit all-ceramic posterior bridges. Dent Mater 21:930–937PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fischer J, Stawarczyk B (2007) Compatibility of machined Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and a veneering ceramic. Dent Mater 23:1500–1505PubMedCrossRef Fischer J, Stawarczyk B (2007) Compatibility of machined Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and a veneering ceramic. Dent Mater 23:1500–1505PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2005) Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 9:161–167PubMedCrossRef Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2005) Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 9:161–167PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH (2005) Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macro-retention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 18:219–244PubMed Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH (2005) Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macro-retention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 18:219–244PubMed
7.
go back to reference Burke FJT, Fleming GJP, Nathanson D, Marquis P (2002) Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 4:7–22PubMed Burke FJT, Fleming GJP, Nathanson D, Marquis P (2002) Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 4:7–22PubMed
8.
go back to reference Stewart GP, Jain P, Hodges J (2002) Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 88:277–284PubMedCrossRef Stewart GP, Jain P, Hodges J (2002) Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 88:277–284PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Burke FJT, Qualthrough AJE, Hale RW (1998) Dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns: current status. J Am Dent Assoc 129:455–460PubMed Burke FJT, Qualthrough AJE, Hale RW (1998) Dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns: current status. J Am Dent Assoc 129:455–460PubMed
10.
go back to reference Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, Berlin JS, Lee JS (2000) Failure toughness of resin-based luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 83:204–209PubMedCrossRef Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, Berlin JS, Lee JS (2000) Failure toughness of resin-based luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 83:204–209PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mitchell CA, Douglas WH, Cheng YS (1999) Failure toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements. Dent Mater 15:7–13PubMedCrossRef Mitchell CA, Douglas WH, Cheng YS (1999) Failure toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements. Dent Mater 15:7–13PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA (2005) Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater 21:445–453PubMedCrossRef Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA (2005) Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater 21:445–453PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M (2006) Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 22:45–56PubMedCrossRef Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M (2006) Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 22:45–56PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G (2004) Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater 20:191–197PubMedCrossRef Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G (2004) Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater 20:191–197PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G (2004) Influence of cement type on the marginal adaption of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 20:463–469PubMedCrossRef Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G (2004) Influence of cement type on the marginal adaption of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 20:463–469PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B (2004) In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium oxide after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 91:356–362PubMedCrossRef Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B (2004) In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium oxide after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 91:356–362PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kern M, Wegner SM (1998) Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. Dent Mater 14:64–71PubMedCrossRef Kern M, Wegner SM (1998) Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. Dent Mater 14:64–71PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 20:963–971PubMedCrossRef De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 20:963–971PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bayle MA, Gregoire G, Sharrock P (2007) The role of acrylophosphonic acid monomers in the formation of hybrid layers based on self-etch adhesive. J Dent 35:302–308PubMedCrossRef Bayle MA, Gregoire G, Sharrock P (2007) The role of acrylophosphonic acid monomers in the formation of hybrid layers based on self-etch adhesive. J Dent 35:302–308PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH (1991) Dentin permeability: effect of crown preparation. Int J Prosthodont 4:219–225PubMed Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH (1991) Dentin permeability: effect of crown preparation. Int J Prosthodont 4:219–225PubMed
21.
go back to reference Pashley DH, Pashley EL (1991) Dentin permeability and restorative dentistry: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 4:5–9PubMed Pashley DH, Pashley EL (1991) Dentin permeability and restorative dentistry: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 4:5–9PubMed
22.
go back to reference Watanabe T, Sano M, Itoh K, Wakumoto S (1991) The effect of primers on the sensitivity of dentin. Dent Mater 7:148–150PubMedCrossRef Watanabe T, Sano M, Itoh K, Wakumoto S (1991) The effect of primers on the sensitivity of dentin. Dent Mater 7:148–150PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schüpbach P, Lutz F, Finger WJ (1997) Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma Desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci 105:414–421PubMedCrossRef Schüpbach P, Lutz F, Finger WJ (1997) Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma Desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci 105:414–421PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Felton DA, Bergenholtz G, Kanoy B (1991) Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 4:292–298PubMed Felton DA, Bergenholtz G, Kanoy B (1991) Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 4:292–298PubMed
25.
go back to reference Dondi dall’Orologio G, Malferrari S (1993) Desensitizing effects of Gluma Primer and Gluma 2000 on hypersensitive dentin. Am J Dent 6:283–286PubMed Dondi dall’Orologio G, Malferrari S (1993) Desensitizing effects of Gluma Primer and Gluma 2000 on hypersensitive dentin. Am J Dent 6:283–286PubMed
26.
go back to reference Meiers JC, Griffo TE, Miller GA (1992) Antimicrobial activity of dentin bonding systems and glass ionomers. J Dent Res Special Issue 71:310 (Abstract. No. 1639) Meiers JC, Griffo TE, Miller GA (1992) Antimicrobial activity of dentin bonding systems and glass ionomers. J Dent Res Special Issue 71:310 (Abstract. No. 1639)
27.
go back to reference Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Gohring TN, Waltimo TM (2004) Glutaraldehyde in bonding systems disinfects dentin in vitro. J Adhes Dent 6:61–64PubMed Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Gohring TN, Waltimo TM (2004) Glutaraldehyde in bonding systems disinfects dentin in vitro. J Adhes Dent 6:61–64PubMed
28.
go back to reference Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Gendusa NJ (1992) Dentin adhesion of modified 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater 8:259–264PubMedCrossRef Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Gendusa NJ (1992) Dentin adhesion of modified 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater 8:259–264PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Edler TL, Krikorinon E, Thompson VP (1991) FITR surface analysis of dentin and dentin bonding agents. J Dent Res 70:1534 Edler TL, Krikorinon E, Thompson VP (1991) FITR surface analysis of dentin and dentin bonding agents. J Dent Res 70:1534
30.
go back to reference Erickson RL (1989) Mechanism and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 2:117–123PubMed Erickson RL (1989) Mechanism and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 2:117–123PubMed
31.
go back to reference Sailer I, Tettamanti S, Stawarczyk B, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH (2010) In vitro study of the influence of dentin desensitizing and sealing on the shear bond strength of two universal resin cements. J Adhes Dent 12:381–392PubMed Sailer I, Tettamanti S, Stawarczyk B, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH (2010) In vitro study of the influence of dentin desensitizing and sealing on the shear bond strength of two universal resin cements. J Adhes Dent 12:381–392PubMed
32.
go back to reference Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hämmerle CHF (2006) Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 22:195–200PubMedCrossRef Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hämmerle CHF (2006) Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 22:195–200PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Huh JB, Kim JH, Chung MK, Lee HY, Choi YG, Shim JS (2008) The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting cement using self-etching primer. J Dent 36:1025–1032PubMedCrossRef Huh JB, Kim JH, Chung MK, Lee HY, Choi YG, Shim JS (2008) The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting cement using self-etching primer. J Dent 36:1025–1032PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Gardner FM, Pashley DH (2000) Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparation. J Prosthet Dent 83:459–465PubMedCrossRef Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Gardner FM, Pashley DH (2000) Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparation. J Prosthet Dent 83:459–465PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference ISO/TS 11405: 2003. Dental materials—testing of adhesion to tooth structure ISO/TS 11405: 2003. Dental materials—testing of adhesion to tooth structure
36.
go back to reference Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M (1990) In-vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation Dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 1. Computergesteuerter Kausimulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:953–960PubMed Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M (1990) In-vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation Dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 1. Computergesteuerter Kausimulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:953–960PubMed
37.
go back to reference Aranha AC, Siqueira Junior CADS, Cavalcante LMA, Pimenta LAF, Marchi GM (2006) Microtensile bond strengths of composite to dentin treated with desensitizer products. J Adhes Dent 8:85–90PubMed Aranha AC, Siqueira Junior CADS, Cavalcante LMA, Pimenta LAF, Marchi GM (2006) Microtensile bond strengths of composite to dentin treated with desensitizer products. J Adhes Dent 8:85–90PubMed
38.
go back to reference Cobb DS, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA (1997) Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement. Am J Dent 10:62–65PubMed Cobb DS, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA (1997) Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement. Am J Dent 10:62–65PubMed
39.
go back to reference Soeno K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M (2001) Effect of desensitizers on bond strength of adhesive luting agents to dentin. J Oral Rehabil 28:1122–1128PubMedCrossRef Soeno K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M (2001) Effect of desensitizers on bond strength of adhesive luting agents to dentin. J Oral Rehabil 28:1122–1128PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ernst CP, Wenzl N, Stender E, Willershausen B (1998) Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 79:472–476PubMedCrossRef Ernst CP, Wenzl N, Stender E, Willershausen B (1998) Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 79:472–476PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ (2006) Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent 96:104–114PubMedCrossRef Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ (2006) Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent 96:104–114PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B (2005) In vitro retentive strength of zirconia oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 93:551–558PubMedCrossRef Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B (2005) In vitro retentive strength of zirconia oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 93:551–558PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Heintze SD (2010) Crown pull-off test (crown retention test) to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of luting agents. Dent Mater 26:193–206PubMedCrossRef Heintze SD (2010) Crown pull-off test (crown retention test) to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of luting agents. Dent Mater 26:193–206PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Göhring TN, Schönenberger KA, Lutz F (2003) Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro. Am J Dent 16:275–282PubMed Göhring TN, Schönenberger KA, Lutz F (2003) Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro. Am J Dent 16:275–282PubMed
45.
go back to reference Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 26:357–366PubMed Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 26:357–366PubMed
46.
go back to reference Krejci I, Lutz F (1990) In-Vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation Dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 3. Korrelation mit In-vivo-Resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1445–1449PubMed Krejci I, Lutz F (1990) In-Vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation Dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 3. Korrelation mit In-vivo-Resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1445–1449PubMed
47.
go back to reference Lutz F, Krejci I (1994) Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes. Quintessence Int 25:185–190PubMed Lutz F, Krejci I (1994) Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes. Quintessence Int 25:185–190PubMed
48.
go back to reference Oilo G (1993) Bond strength testing—what does it mean. Int Dent J 43:492–498PubMed Oilo G (1993) Bond strength testing—what does it mean. Int Dent J 43:492–498PubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of Gluma Desensitizer on the tensile strength of zirconia crowns bonded to dentin: an in vitro study
Authors
Bogna Stawarczyk
Leonie Hartmann
Rahel Hartmann
Malgorzata Roos
Andreas Ender
Mutlu Özcan
Irena Sailer
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0502-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Clinical Oral Investigations 1/2012 Go to the issue