Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Original Scientific Report

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Managing Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

Authors: Sung Min Jung, Yong Sang Hong, Tae Won Kim, Jin-hong Park, Jong Hoon Kim, Seong Ho Park, Ah Young Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Young-Joo Lee, Chang Sik Yu

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The wide variety of treatment strategies makes clinical decision-making difficult in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer cases. Many hospitals have started multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings comprising a team of dedicated specialists for discussing cases. MDTs for selected cases that are difficult to diagnose and treat are alternatives to regular MDTs. This study’s aim was to determine the impact of a MDT for colorectal cancer on clinical decision-making.

Methods

Cases were discussed when clinical specialists had difficulty making decisions alone. All processes done by the MDT were then recorded in prospectively designed medical case forms.

Results

From Jan 2011 to Dec 2014, 1383 cases were discussed. A total of 549 (39.8%) case forms were completed for patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, whereas 833 (60.2%) were completed for those with recurrent diseases. The MDT altered the proposed treatment of the referring physician in 179 (13%) cases. In 85 of the 179 (47.5%) altered cases, the radiologist’s review of clinical information affected the diagnosis and decision. Furthermore, 152 of the 1383 MDT decisions were not implemented. Treatment intent, therapeutic plan, and alteration of decision were important reasons for not following the MDT’s recommendation.

Conclusion

Case discussions in MDT meetings resulted in altered clinical decisions in >10% cases. Implementation rates after MDT discussions might be affected by the treatment decision-making process. Imperfect decisions made by individual physicians can be decreased by the multidisciplinary decision-making process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS, Craigs C, Forman D (2006) The impact of the Calman–Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 95(8):979–985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS, Craigs C, Forman D (2006) The impact of the Calman–Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 95(8):979–985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A (2007) Expert panel on multidisciplinary cancer conference standards. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 43(6):1002–1010CrossRefPubMed Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A (2007) Expert panel on multidisciplinary cancer conference standards. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 43(6):1002–1010CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee (2005) Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. National Health and Medical Research Council, Sydney Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee (2005) Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. National Health and Medical Research Council, Sydney
4.
go back to reference Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF (2010) Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol 102(2):125–134CrossRefPubMed Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF (2010) Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol 102(2):125–134CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Munro A, Brown M, Niblock P, Steele R, Carey F (2015) Do Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience. BMC Cancer 15:686CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Munro A, Brown M, Niblock P, Steele R, Carey F (2015) Do Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience. BMC Cancer 15:686CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG, Monson JR (2008) Colorectal MDTs: the team’s perspective. Colorectal Dis 10(1):63–68PubMed Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG, Monson JR (2008) Colorectal MDTs: the team’s perspective. Colorectal Dis 10(1):63–68PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ryan J, Faragher I (2014) Not all patients need to be discussed in a colorectal cancer MDT meeting. Colorectal Dis 16(7):520–526CrossRefPubMed Ryan J, Faragher I (2014) Not all patients need to be discussed in a colorectal cancer MDT meeting. Colorectal Dis 16(7):520–526CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chinai N, Bintcliffe F, Armstrong EM, Teape J, Jones BM, Hosie KB (2013) Does every patient need to be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting? Clin Radiol 68(8):780–784CrossRefPubMed Chinai N, Bintcliffe F, Armstrong EM, Teape J, Jones BM, Hosie KB (2013) Does every patient need to be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting? Clin Radiol 68(8):780–784CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Daniels IR, Fisher SE, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2007) Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence. Colorectal Dis 9(4):290–301CrossRefPubMed Daniels IR, Fisher SE, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2007) Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence. Colorectal Dis 9(4):290–301CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chang KH, Smith MJ, McAnena OJ, Aprjanto AS, Dowdall JF (2012) Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(10):1275–1283CrossRefPubMed Chang KH, Smith MJ, McAnena OJ, Aprjanto AS, Dowdall JF (2012) Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(10):1275–1283CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M et al (2009) Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 11(3):291–295CrossRefPubMed MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M et al (2009) Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 11(3):291–295CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7(11):935–943CrossRefPubMed Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7(11):935–943CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vaughan-Shaw PG, Wheeler JM, Borley NR (2015) The impact of a dedicated multidisciplinary team on the management of early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 17(8):704–709CrossRefPubMed Vaughan-Shaw PG, Wheeler JM, Borley NR (2015) The impact of a dedicated multidisciplinary team on the management of early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 17(8):704–709CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bergamini C, Locati L, Bossi P et al (2016) Does a multidisciplinary team approach in a tertiary referral centre impact on the initial management of head and neck cancer? Oral Oncol 54:54–57CrossRefPubMed Bergamini C, Locati L, Bossi P et al (2016) Does a multidisciplinary team approach in a tertiary referral centre impact on the initial management of head and neck cancer? Oral Oncol 54:54–57CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wood JJ, Metcalfe C, Paes A et al (2008) An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 10(8):769–772CrossRefPubMed Wood JJ, Metcalfe C, Paes A et al (2008) An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 10(8):769–772CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Managing Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
Authors
Sung Min Jung
Yong Sang Hong
Tae Won Kim
Jin-hong Park
Jong Hoon Kim
Seong Ho Park
Ah Young Kim
Seok-Byung Lim
Young-Joo Lee
Chang Sik Yu
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4409-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

World Journal of Surgery 7/2018 Go to the issue