Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Methodology

Impact of a deferred recruitment model in a randomised controlled trial in primary care (CREAM study)

Authors: Victoria Shepherd, Emma Thomas-Jones, Matthew J. Ridd, Kerenza Hood, Katy Addison, Nick A. Francis

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recruitment of participants is particularly challenging in primary care, with less than a third of randomised controlled trials (RCT) achieving their target within the original time frame. Participant identification, consent, randomisation and data collection can all be time-consuming. Trials recruiting an incident, as opposed to a prevalent, population may be particularly affected. This paper describes the impact of a deferred recruitment model in a RCT of antibiotics for children with infected eczema in primary care, which required the recruitment of cases presenting acutely.

Methods

Eligible children were identified by participating general practitioners (GPs) and referred to a study research nurse, who then visited them at home. This allowed the consent and recruitment processes to take place outside the general practice setting.
Information was recorded about patients who were referred and recruited, or if not, the reasons for non-recruitment. Data on recruitment challenges were collected through semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with a sample of participating GPs. Data were thematically analysed to identify key themes.

Results

Of the children referred to the study 34% (58/171) were not recruited – 48% (28/58) because of difficulties arranging a baseline visit within the defined time frame, 31% (18/58) did not meet the study inclusion criteria at the time of nurse assessment, and 21% (12/58) declined participation. GPs had positive views about the recruitment process, reporting that parents valued and benefitted from additional contact with a nurse. GPs felt that the deferred recruitment model did not negatively impact on the study.

Conclusions

GPs and parents recognised the benefits of deferred recruitment, but these did not translate into enhanced recruitment of participants. The model resulted in the loss of a third of children who were identified by the GP as eligible, but not subsequently recruited to the study. If the potential for improving outcomes in primary care through complex studies is to be realised, new approaches to recruitment into primary care trials need to be developed and evaluated.

Trial registration

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN96705420. Registered on 27 June 2012.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bower P, Wallace P, Ward E, Graffy J, Miller J, Delaney B, Kinmouth AL. Improving recruitment to health research in primary care. Fam Pract. 2009;26:391–7.CrossRefPubMed Bower P, Wallace P, Ward E, Graffy J, Miller J, Delaney B, Kinmouth AL. Improving recruitment to health research in primary care. Fam Pract. 2009;26:391–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, Elbourne DR, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, Snowdon C. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7(1):9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, Elbourne DR, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, Snowdon C. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7(1):9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Bower P, Wilson S, Mathers N. Short report: how often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? Fam Pract. 2007;24:601–3.CrossRefPubMed Bower P, Wilson S, Mathers N. Short report: how often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? Fam Pract. 2007;24:601–3.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Foster JM, Sawyer SM, Smith L, Reddel HK, Usherwood T. Barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment to a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care: lessons for future trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foster JM, Sawyer SM, Smith L, Reddel HK, Usherwood T. Barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment to a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care: lessons for future trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference White D, Hind D. Projection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study. Trials. 2015;16(1):1.CrossRef White D, Hind D. Projection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study. Trials. 2015;16(1):1.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Prout H, Butler C, Kinnersley P, Robling M, Hood K, Tudor-Jones R. A qualitative evaluation of implementing a randomized controlled trial in general practice. Fam Pract. 2003;20(6):675–81.CrossRefPubMed Prout H, Butler C, Kinnersley P, Robling M, Hood K, Tudor-Jones R. A qualitative evaluation of implementing a randomized controlled trial in general practice. Fam Pract. 2003;20(6):675–81.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wilson S, Delaney BC, Roalfe A, Roberts L, Redman V, Wearn AM, Hobbs FD. Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study. BMJ. 2000;321:24–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilson S, Delaney BC, Roalfe A, Roberts L, Redman V, Wearn AM, Hobbs FD. Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study. BMJ. 2000;321:24–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Francis NA, Ridd MJ, Thomas-Jones E, Butler CC, Hood K, Shepherd V, Marwick C, Huang C, Longo M, Wootton M, Sullivan F. CREAM Trial Management Group. Oral and topical antibiotics for clinically infected eczema in children: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in ambulatory care. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(2):124–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Francis NA, Ridd MJ, Thomas-Jones E, Butler CC, Hood K, Shepherd V, Marwick C, Huang C, Longo M, Wootton M, Sullivan F. CREAM Trial Management Group. Oral and topical antibiotics for clinically infected eczema in children: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in ambulatory care. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(2):124–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Ward E, Miller J, Graffy J, Bower P. Contrasting approaches to recruitment in primary care research. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2009;10(4):368–73.CrossRef Ward E, Miller J, Graffy J, Bower P. Contrasting approaches to recruitment in primary care research. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2009;10(4):368–73.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ngune I, Jiwa M, Dadich A, Lotriet J, Sriram D. Effective recruitment strategies in primary care research: a systematic review. Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(2):115–23.PubMed Ngune I, Jiwa M, Dadich A, Lotriet J, Sriram D. Effective recruitment strategies in primary care research: a systematic review. Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(2):115–23.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Newington L, Metcalfe A. Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Newington L, Metcalfe A. Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Treweek S, Mitchell E, Pitkethly M, Cook J, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;4(4). Treweek S, Mitchell E, Pitkethly M, Cook J, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;4(4).
15.
go back to reference Finkelstein JA, Dutta-Linn M, Meyer R, Goldman R. Childhood infections, antibiotics and resistance: what are parents saying now? Clin Pediatr. 2014;53(2):145–50.CrossRef Finkelstein JA, Dutta-Linn M, Meyer R, Goldman R. Childhood infections, antibiotics and resistance: what are parents saying now? Clin Pediatr. 2014;53(2):145–50.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ashiru-Oredope D, Hopkins S. Antimicrobial resistance: moving from professional engagement to public action. J Antimicrob Ther. 2015. doi:10.1093/jac/dkv297 Ashiru-Oredope D, Hopkins S. Antimicrobial resistance: moving from professional engagement to public action. J Antimicrob Ther. 2015. doi:10.​1093/​jac/​dkv297
17.
go back to reference Ridd MJ, et al. Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012021. Ridd MJ, et al. Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET): feasibility study of a randomised controlled parallel group trial in children recruited from primary care. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012021.
18.
go back to reference Powell K, et al. Exceeding the recruitment target in a primary care paediatric trial: an evaluation of the Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET) feasibility randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):550.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Powell K, et al. Exceeding the recruitment target in a primary care paediatric trial: an evaluation of the Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET) feasibility randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):550.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Impact of a deferred recruitment model in a randomised controlled trial in primary care (CREAM study)
Authors
Victoria Shepherd
Emma Thomas-Jones
Matthew J. Ridd
Kerenza Hood
Katy Addison
Nick A. Francis
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2284-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue