Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Scientific Report

Impact of 3D Printing Technology on Comprehension of Surgical Anatomy of Retroperitoneal Tumor

Authors: Tianyou Yang, Shuwen Lin, Tianbao Tan, Jiliang Yang, Jing Pan, Chao Hu, Jiahao Li, Yan Zou

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the impact of 3D printed model on understanding of surgical anatomy of retroperitoneal tumor.

Materials and methods

Three-dimensional model was printed, based on multi-detectors computed tomography (MDCT) of a retroperitoneal tumor. Participants (10 students, 10 residents and 10 surgeons) were asked to identify vasculatures which were important in resection of the tumor, after viewing MDCT images, 3D visualization model and 3D printed model, respectively. Regarding this tumor, left renal vein (LRV), right renal pedicles (RRP) and inferior vena cava (IVC) were chosen as indicators to assess participants’ performances. Identification of vasculatures was evaluated and a score was given (1 point = success; 0 point = failure). The total number and percentage of correct identification were used to measure how these three types of anatomic presentation were able to transfer in terms of anatomical recognition. Recorded data were analyzed both pooling together data from three groups of participants and separately for each group.

Results

In analysis of overall comparison among 3D printing, 3D visualization and MDCT, recognition of all three vasculatures simultaneously was 83.33, 73.33 and 46.67%, respectively (P = 0.007); recognition of LRV was 90, 80 and 63.33% (P = 0.043), respectively; recognition of RRP was 96.67, 83.33 and 73.33% (P = 0.035), respectively; recognition of IVC was 93.33, 90 and 80% (P = 0.366), respectively. In subgroup analysis of performances of three groups of participants, no significant differences regarding anatomic recognition were observed among MDCT, 3D visualization and 3D printed model for each group of participants.

Conclusion

Three-dimensional printed model improved the understanding of surgical anatomy of retroperitoneal tumor.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE (2009) Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces—part I: embryogenesis and anatomy. Am Surg 75:1091–1097PubMed Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE (2009) Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces—part I: embryogenesis and anatomy. Am Surg 75:1091–1097PubMed
2.
go back to reference Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE (2010) Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces, part IV: retroperitoneal nerves. Am Surg 76:253–262PubMed Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE (2010) Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces, part IV: retroperitoneal nerves. Am Surg 76:253–262PubMed
3.
go back to reference Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE (2010) Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces part II: the architecture of the retroperitoneal space. Am Surg 76:33–42PubMed Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE (2010) Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces part II: the architecture of the retroperitoneal space. Am Surg 76:33–42PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE (2010) Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces, part V: surgical applications and complications. Am Surg 76:358–364PubMed Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE (2010) Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces, part V: surgical applications and complications. Am Surg 76:358–364PubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Lamade W, Glombitza G, Fischer L et al (2000) The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg 135:1256–1261CrossRefPubMed Lamade W, Glombitza G, Fischer L et al (2000) The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg 135:1256–1261CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference van Leeuwen MS, Noordzij J, Hennipman A et al (1995) Planning of liver surgery using three dimensional imaging techniques. Eur J Cancer 31a:1212–1215CrossRefPubMed van Leeuwen MS, Noordzij J, Hennipman A et al (1995) Planning of liver surgery using three dimensional imaging techniques. Eur J Cancer 31a:1212–1215CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee N (2016) The Lancet Technology: 3D printing for instruments, models, and organs? Lancet 388:1368CrossRefPubMed Lee N (2016) The Lancet Technology: 3D printing for instruments, models, and organs? Lancet 388:1368CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Ge HW, Li NC et al (2016) Evaluation of three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of renal tumors: a preliminary report. World J Urol 34:533–537CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Ge HW, Li NC et al (2016) Evaluation of three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of renal tumors: a preliminary report. World J Urol 34:533–537CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Soon DSC, Chae MP, Pilgrim CHC et al (2016) 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: a systematic review. Ann Med Surg 10:1–7CrossRef Soon DSC, Chae MP, Pilgrim CHC et al (2016) 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: a systematic review. Ann Med Surg 10:1–7CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Powers MK, Lee BR, Silberstein J (2016) Three-dimensional printing of surgical anatomy. Curr Opin Urol 26:283–288CrossRefPubMed Powers MK, Lee BR, Silberstein J (2016) Three-dimensional printing of surgical anatomy. Curr Opin Urol 26:283–288CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zein NN, Hanouneh IA, Bishop PD et al (2013) Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 19:1304–1310CrossRefPubMed Zein NN, Hanouneh IA, Bishop PD et al (2013) Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 19:1304–1310CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Madurska MJ, Poyade M, Eason D et al (2017) Development of a patient-specific 3D-printed liver model for preoperative planning. Surg Innov 24:145–150CrossRefPubMed Madurska MJ, Poyade M, Eason D et al (2017) Development of a patient-specific 3D-printed liver model for preoperative planning. Surg Innov 24:145–150CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Souzaki R, Kinoshita Y, Ieiri S et al (2015) Three-dimensional liver model based on preoperative CT images as a tool to assist in surgical planning for hepatoblastoma in a child. Pediatr Surg Int 31:593–596CrossRefPubMed Souzaki R, Kinoshita Y, Ieiri S et al (2015) Three-dimensional liver model based on preoperative CT images as a tool to assist in surgical planning for hepatoblastoma in a child. Pediatr Surg Int 31:593–596CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Shafiee A, Atala A (2016) Printing technologies for medical applications. Trends Mol Med 22:254–265CrossRefPubMed Shafiee A, Atala A (2016) Printing technologies for medical applications. Trends Mol Med 22:254–265CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Malik HH, Darwood AR, Shaunak S et al (2015) Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res 199:512–522CrossRefPubMed Malik HH, Darwood AR, Shaunak S et al (2015) Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res 199:512–522CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of 3D Printing Technology on Comprehension of Surgical Anatomy of Retroperitoneal Tumor
Authors
Tianyou Yang
Shuwen Lin
Tianbao Tan
Jiliang Yang
Jing Pan
Chao Hu
Jiahao Li
Yan Zou
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4489-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

World Journal of Surgery 8/2018 Go to the issue